Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: The Greatest on 2 May 2010 21:03 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > Goat fucker.... > > pathalogical.... > > A plagiarist.... > > A goat fucker.... > > A goat fucker.... > -- > King Rat Do you raise Goats, Ratzio ?? -- HJ
From: The Greatest on 2 May 2010 21:12 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > Ignorant....goat fucker.... > > ignorant.... > > ignorant.... > > pathological.... > > goat fucker.... > > Goat Fucker.... > > Coward.... > > Wholly ignorant.... > > Goat fucker.... > -- > King Rat That was a really Good Confession, Ko0k Ratz !! -- HJ
From: The Greatest on 2 May 2010 21:17 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > Goat fucker.... > > Pathological goat fucker.... > > Amateur goat fucker.... > > "HACHIROKU GOAT FUCKER".... > > COWARD.... > > Goat fucker.... > > Goat fucker.... > -- > King Rat You and them Goats....again.... Heee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! -- HJ
From: pandora on 2 May 2010 21:58 On Sun, 02 May 2010 01:48:57 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Sat, 01 May 2010 15:38:33 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:23:18 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:40:07 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>>> Because of a case here in Mass where a girl was bullied to the point >>>>> of hanging herself, and since a good portion of that bullying came >>>>> from the Internet, more laws are probably going to be passed with >>>>> regards to "trolling" (the Commonwealth's term for Internet >>>>> bullying) >>>> >>>> And they would be wrong as they are not the same. By the way, are you >>>> feeling bullied? You poor thing. >>> >>> Yeah? Wait and see. There are new laws in the pipe. >> >> Figures you would be one to support such. > > Where did I say that? > Why did you mention them? >>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the likes of >>> you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it was part of the >>> DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still stuck back in the >>> early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws out. >> >> So you DO feel bullied. > > By whom? There isn't anyone here clever enough to get under my skin. > Like I said...amateurs. Actually, more like Wannabes. Sure, dear. We hear you.
From: pandora on 2 May 2010 22:03
On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:22:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sat, 01 May 2010 15:38:33 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:23:18 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:40:07 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>>> Because of a case here in Mass where a girl was bullied to the point >>>>> of hanging herself, and since a good portion of that bullying came >>>>> from the Internet, more laws are probably going to be passed with >>>>> regards to "trolling" (the Commonwealth's term for Internet >>>>> bullying) >>>> >>>> And they would be wrong as they are not the same. By the way, are you >>>> feeling bullied? You poor thing. >>> >>> Yeah? Wait and see. There are new laws in the pipe. >> >>Figures you would be one to support such. >> >>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the likes of >>> you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it was part of the >>> DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still stuck back in the >>> early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws out. >> >>So you DO feel bullied. > > "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys > are amateurs." > > DARPA ended its ARPANET project in 74/75 and turned it over to Defense > Communications Agency (the *project* was complete. USENET was invented > in 1979. He didn't have ARPANET access until at least 1983 when he was > some gopher (probably didn't have any just worked somewhere that did). I always find it amusing when someone feels it is necessary to lie in order to impress. :-) |