Motzarella stopped propegating messages...
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: The Greatest on 3 May 2010 22:01 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > amateur.... > > Ignorant.... > -- > King Rat Good description of yourself for the "newbies", Ratzio the "King of all Ko0ks" !! -- HJ
From: pandora on 3 May 2010 22:07 On Mon, 03 May 2010 17:59:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 02 May 2010 20:58:41 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 02 May 2010 01:48:57 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 01 May 2010 15:38:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:23:18 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:40:07 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Because of a case here in Mass where a girl was bullied to the >>>>>>> point of hanging herself, and since a good portion of that >>>>>>> bullying came from the Internet, more laws are probably going to >>>>>>> be passed with regards to "trolling" (the Commonwealth's term for >>>>>>> Internet bullying) >>>>>> >>>>>> And they would be wrong as they are not the same. By the way, are >>>>>> you feeling bullied? You poor thing. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah? Wait and see. There are new laws in the pipe. >>>> >>>> Figures you would be one to support such. >>> >>> Where did I say that? >>> >>Why did you mention them? >> >>>>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the likes of >>>>> you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it was part of >>>>> the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still stuck back in >>>>> the early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws out. >>>> >>>> So you DO feel bullied. >>> >>> By whom? There isn't anyone here clever enough to get under my skin. >>> Like I said...amateurs. Actually, more like Wannabes. >> >>Sure, dear. We hear you. > > So much amateurs he had to back pedal from his claims. He is now onto > "it wasn't my fault, they didn't tell me the right answer". Indeed. > My guess is he still thinks that DARPA and ARPANET are the same thing. > Even after I explained one is an agency and the other was an > infrastructure originally created by the former. > > But he will stand by his belief it wasn't his fault he was ignorant. Well, I tend to believe that if one is ignorant, it IS one's own fault. After all, one CAN learn what one doesn't know.
From: The Greatest on 3 May 2010 22:09 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > He claimed I didn't have a clue. > He claimed that the timeline was bullshit. > -- > King Rat Come-on Ratz....cut the bullshit and tell us about you and your goats !! I can't respond if you don't tell us about your "Goat-Fuckin'" like you have been doin' for the last couple of days !! You DO want me to respond to you....don't you ?? We ALL in 'AUK' want to hear how you "corn-hole the critters" on your farm !! -- Your Pal, Honest John p.s. Don't forget to cuss and call others "Bad Names" too....I'm depending on you to comply !!
From: pandora on 3 May 2010 22:18 On Mon, 03 May 2010 18:20:28 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 02 May 2010 21:56:58 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:03:42 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:25:23 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>Amazing. You keep getting caught in lie after lie, and then you keep >>>>>going. Thick as a brick. >>>> >>>> What lie, be specific, I have been, the following quote is 100% lie >>>> >>>> "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You >>>> guys are amateurs." >>> >>> Ow. Wow. I guess he got me. >> >>Yes, he did. >> >>We were still calling it DARPANet where I >>> was working. >> >>No one else is responsible for your ignorance. >> >>Not being as much of a mental giant as Chowderhead, I >>> really wasn't paying attention to the semantics at the time. It may >>> have been run by DCA, but we were still using the term "DARPANet". >>> >>> Big, Fat Hairy Deal. >> >>Yes, it is. >> >>> As far as you being an amatuer, no lie at all. Chowderhead. >> >>I'd say the amateur is you, dollface. > > He is still conflating Darpa the agency with DARPANET/ARPANET the > infrastructure. So I noticed. > He really does not see them as completely different things. > > So I have to wonder, how does an infrastucture have projects? That's a very good question.
From: Aratzio on 3 May 2010 22:18
On Mon, 03 May 2010 00:12:55 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 02 May 2010 21:03:51 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:22:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 01 May 2010 15:38:33 -0500, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >>> double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:23:18 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:40:07 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Because of a case here in Mass where a girl was bullied to the point >>>>>>> of hanging herself, and since a good portion of that bullying came >>>>>>> from the Internet, more laws are probably going to be passed with >>>>>>> regards to "trolling" (the Commonwealth's term for Internet >>>>>>> bullying) >>>>>> >>>>>> And they would be wrong as they are not the same. By the way, are you >>>>>> feeling bullied? You poor thing. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah? Wait and see. There are new laws in the pipe. >>>> >>>>Figures you would be one to support such. >>>> >>>>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the likes of >>>>> you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it was part of the >>>>> DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still stuck back in the >>>>> early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws out. >>>> >>>>So you DO feel bullied. >>> >>> "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys >>> are amateurs." >>> >>> DARPA ended its ARPANET project in 74/75 and turned it over to Defense >>> Communications Agency (the *project* was complete. USENET was invented >>> in 1979. He didn't have ARPANET access until at least 1983 when he was >>> some gopher (probably didn't have any just worked somewhere that did). >> >> I always find it amusing when someone feels it is necessary to lie in >> order to impress. >> >> :-) > >He'll get past that someday. "I know you are but what am I?" -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. " |