Motzarella stopped propegating messages...
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: Aratzio on 2 May 2010 05:01 On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:23:52 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sat, 01 May 2010 22:51:17 -0700, Chowderhead wrote: > >> On Sat, 01 May 2010 16:32:37 -0400, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Sat, 01 May 2010 11:15:30 -0700, Chowderhead wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 01 May 2010 12:28:24 -0400, in the land of >>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>>> got double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:41:48 -0700, Chowderhead wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Your ignorant missives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I'm not the ignorant one here, Genius. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Nuh uh <stomp>" >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow, scathing. >>>>> >>>>>Yeah. >>>> >>>> It is sad when they cannot even detect the most obvious of sarcasm. >>> >>>Really. As usual, it went right over your head, nitwit. >> >> "I know you are but what am I?" > >Took you all day to come up with that? Hope it didn't give you a headache, >Chowderhead. I know that is the kind of time pressure under which you work but the rest of us can keep up a fairly decent pace. > >> >> >>> >>>>>See below. Nitwit. >>>> >>>> It is good to see you take pride in your lies and dishonesty. I have to >>>> admit it would shock me to see a wingnut that actually had positive >>>> moral or ethical standards. >>> >>><YAWN> Caught with your panties down, so it's a "lie"? Why do I expect >>>anything more from a stupid Libturd? >> >> Seriously, does your misquoting and plagiarizing <SLAP!> Lets see what scared him so badly: :Seriously, does your misquoting and plagiarizing someone cause a :comment directed at you to be directed at the person you plagiarized? :Is that what you are trying to claim? Yep, he couldn't answer. > ><YAWN> > >I don't need to walk around in circles >walk around in circles >walk around in circles >walk around in >don't need to walk around in circles >walk around in circles >walk around in circles >walk around in The Dave Matthews school of repetitive song writing. I am pretty sure there is room for only one hack in that school. -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 2 May 2010 05:13 On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:32:25 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:22:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Sat, 01 May 2010 15:38:33 -0500, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:23:18 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:40:07 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Because of a case here in Mass where a girl was bullied to the point >>>>>> of hanging herself, and since a good portion of that bullying came >>>>>> from the Internet, more laws are probably going to be passed with >>>>>> regards to "trolling" (the Commonwealth's term for Internet >>>>>> bullying) >>>>> >>>>> And they would be wrong as they are not the same. By the way, are you >>>>> feeling bullied? You poor thing. >>>> >>>> Yeah? Wait and see. There are new laws in the pipe. >>> >>>Figures you would be one to support such. >>> >>>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the likes of >>>> you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it was part of the >>>> DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still stuck back in the >>>> early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws out. >>> >>>So you DO feel bullied. >> >> "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys >> are amateurs." >> >> DARPA ended its ARPANET project in 74/75 and turned it over to Defense >> Communications Agency (the *project* was complete. USENET was invented >> in 1979. He didn't have ARPANET access until at least 1983 when he was >> some gopher (probably didn't have any just worked somewhere that did). > >And? You just contradicted yourself again, Chowderhead. And, it makes a >difference where I had access to it? Never said it was at home. Really, what contradiction do you see? Specifically is it, 1.You were wrong about DARPA and their connection to ARPANET in 1983 2. USENET was created 4 years after DARPA had no more connection to ARPANET and could not have been in any way connected to each other? 3. You couldn't have been around for either? So what were the years that USENET was part of the DARPA Project? > >Here, this ought to make what's left of your feeble mind leak out of your >ear like tomato soup: > > * 1985. By the middle of the 80's there were ARPANET gateways to > external networks across North America, Europe, and in Australia, and > the Internet was global in scope. Marty Lyons has created a map of the > existing network gateways from 18 June 1985. Yes, ARPANET expanded in the 80s. How does that support "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs." Do you think that ARPANET (an infrastructure) and DARPA (a defense research agency) are the same thing? > > * 1990. The ARPANET was retired in 1990. Most university computers > that were connected to it were moved to networks connected to the > NSFNET, passing the torch from the old network to the new. Yep, completely accurate and DARPA had still ended the reseqrch project and turned over the ARPANET to the Defense Communcations Ageny in 1975. It does look like you think an Infrastructure and an Agency are the same thing. You do know they are different. One is mostly people, the other was mostly electrons. > >http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet_gateways.htm > >Note the date, Chowderhead. Also note "Milnet" and "Usenet". > >Liar. But please, make some more stuff up. So do point out the DARPA connection in your screed? Specifically how the agency that passed off the ARPANET to the Defense Communications Agency in 1975 was involved "on the project" as you claimed in 1983: "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs." -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 2 May 2010 05:41 On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:46:05 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:11:25 -0700, Chowderhead wrote: > >> On Sat, 01 May 2010 16:35:19 -0400, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Sat, 01 May 2010 11:06:10 -0700, Chowderhead wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 01 May 2010 12:25:45 -0400, in the land of >>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>>> got double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 01 May 2010 01:25:50 -0700, Chowderhead wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Someday you might learn and then the Swedish chicks won't make fun >>>>>>>> of your pathetic English. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>One more time: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>And, who cares, exactly? >>>>>> >>>>>> Poor baby, that is all you have, feigned disinterest , the facts >>>>>> don't go your way, feign disinterest. Get laughed at, feign >>>>>> disinterest. >>>>>> >>>>>> Funny thing, you will be right back. You care so little you will not >>>>>> be able to keep from responding. >>>>> >>>> <snip-n-run coward proves me right, again> >>>>>Truth is, Nitwit, I really DON'T care. >>>> >>>> I'm laughing at you again. >>>> >>>> Now prove how much you don't care again. >>> >>>By watching you working double time to keep up. And failing miserably due >>>to you inablility to connect more than one thought at a time. >> >> Really, I seemed to be able to connect where you lied about: "I've been on >> Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project." > >Wrong. As usual. Guess you can't even use Google properly. >http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet.htm Do, factual statement or not: "Darpa ended the project and turned ARPANET over to Defense Communications Agency in 1975" > >> >> Funny how that one worked out. That whole ARPANET project being complete >> in 1975 and USENET not being invented until 1979 thought connection. > >And, I said I was using it...when? 1984, wasn't it? Where did 1979 come >from, Chowderhead? > >http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet_gateways.htm 1979 was when USENET was invented. DARPA was not involved with ARPANET in 1979. ""I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs." See, you claim that DARPA project was running USENET. That is impossible. DARPA was not running the ARPANET after 1975. If they were no longer running ARPANET in 1975 then there is no way for them to be running USENET in 1979 when USENET was invented. You came along 4 years after USENET was invented and 8 years after DARPA had ended its ARPANET project and turned it over to the Defense Communications Agency. No project after 1975. So no way for this to be true: "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs." See USENET was never at any time part of the DARPA project. Never, not at any time. It did run on ARPANET but that was an Infrastructure. > >> >> So do you think if you tell enough lies one might accidentally turn out >> to be true? > >Um, I think that's your ploy, Chowderhead. Maybe you think if you lie >enough people will get confused, but it seems to be backfiring, doesn't it? >You can't even keep the dates straight. I've pointed out numerous of your lies and yet you cannot point to anything I write and say I am lying. You just claim I lie, not the same thing. Me: Evidence You: More lying. See below is a lie: "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs." > >It took you 7 hours to reply. What did you do in the meantime, smack >yourself in the head repeatedly with a Single-Jack mallet? Sure seems that >way from here. Ah, you were sitting there refreshing and refreshing while I was out and about with a friend. You just could not wait for my next missive. It was consuming you as I made you wait those long an tortuous hours between missives. The time eating holes in your stomach as the acid and bile builds. Well, I hope you are happier now? Stress under control? Blood pressure down to just dangerously high? > >You don't get anywhere by backpedalling, Chowderhead. So, do you see any backpedalling, liar? -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 2 May 2010 05:50 On Sun, 02 May 2010 03:05:53 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, Robb <--robb(a)shared-secrets.com> got double secret probation for writing: >Aratzio wrote: > >>Now, here comes my fun part >> >>Go ahead detail the subtelties you feel David is expressing either >>lyrically or musically. Give your take on where he was taking the >>listener. Take as much space as you need. > >Das good! Was ist los, Robb? > >Geh mit mir in den Morgentau >Geh mit mir in den Morgentau heute >Kann nicht mit dir in den Morgentau gehen >Kann nicht mit dir in den Morgentau gehen heute >Dachte, ich h�rte einen Jungen weinen, Mama >Dachte, ich h�rte einen Jungen weinen heute >H�rst du keinen Jungen weinen >H�rst du keinen Jungen weinen, Mama <- "memazz" > >Nun hat man keinen Morgentau mehr >Nun hat man keinen Morgentau mehr heute >Was du immer gesagt hast, ist wahr >Nun hat man keinen Morgentau mehr. <- push "mehrrrrrrr" > >Geh mit mir in den Morgentau >Geh mit mir in den Morgentau heute >Kann nicht mit dir in den Morgentau gehen >Nun hat man keinen Morgentau mehr. > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0FgVNjb9TM The only Morgentau I know is a semi-sweet white wine. -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: �n�hw��f on 2 May 2010 11:19
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> clouded the waters of pure thought with news:hrhkka$pqk$3(a)news.eternal-september.org: > On Sat, 01 May 2010 10:42:00 -0500, §nühw¤£f wrote: > >> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= >> <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> clouded the waters of pure thought with >> news:hrg998$hd3$13(a)news.eternal-september.org: >> >>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:22:07 -0600, §nühw¤£f wrote: >>> >>>> Hachiroku ããã㯠wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:40:07 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Because of a case here in Mass where a girl was bullied to >>>>>>> the point of hanging herself, and since a good portion of >>>>>>> that bullying came from the Internet, more laws are probably >>>>>>> going to be passed with regards to "trolling" (the >>>>>>> Commonwealth's term for Internet bullying) >>>>>> And they would be wrong as they are not the same. By the way, >>>>>> are you feeling bullied? You poor thing. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah? Wait and see. There are new laws in the pipe. >>>>> >>>>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the >>>>> likes of you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since >>>>> it was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, >>>>> still stuck back in the early 90's, based on the lames >>>>> Ratzhole throws out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> War Stories: everybody's got 'em. >>>> >>>> I remember when we had to fire up the Edison model B teletype >>>> and wait for several hours before a troll would show some >>>> promise... >>> >>> >>> YOU had a TELETYPE?! We had a scribe with a quill and papyrus! >>> He had to decipher the ... --- ... >>> >> Pft! You kids...smoke signals was what we had...and we liked em >> just fine! >> >> <shakes fist at clouds> > > Wasn't the baud rate a bit low? > > Wholly dependendent on the wind speed and direction. -- http://www.skepticalscience.com/ cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org _____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____ / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\ _\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\ /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\ |