Motzarella stopped propegating messages...
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: Aratzio on 2 May 2010 17:35 On Sun, 02 May 2010 12:58:48 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 02 May 2010 01:17:51 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>I'd have to listen to it again. I stopped playing a lot of that stuff >>>years ago and progressed along the way. I play current stuff rather than >>>staying stuck in the seventies. I also try not to use the same old lames >>>from 20 years ago, too. Ooops! Too close, Chowderhead? >> >> Yes, the Xerox of music. Copy, copy, copy... > >That logic would make you the Xerox of Usenet, "cupcake". >Have you ever had an original flame since you started? So "maundering self serving solipsism" as a description of your *thought* process is unoriginal? Do you have a better flame to describe your muddle miasma of thinking, goat fucker? But the hilarious hypocrisy of someone whose standard response is a canned non sequitur claiming anyone unoriginal might have broken irony meters in Michael Steele's house. > >> >> And the music of PF, Waters & Gilmour transcend any era. > >Especially if you haven't mentally grown past the age of 21, as in your >case, Chowderhead. So, about those "subtleties" you claim to know exist in the song "There's No Way Out Of Here"? You never provided that. See: :>> <The musical equivelent of a Xerox writes> :> :>At least I can do something other than be a keyboard badass on Usenet. :>And I don't 'copy', I make up my own basslines. You can't even make up :>your mind, Chowderhead. : :Sure you do, cupcake. Given the filmy depth of your creativity here, I :am sure you imagine yourself the second coming of Jamerson. : :Why don't you share your mumbling depth with everyone and allow others :to make up their minds as to your lack of talent. Well? : :> :>>>I'm surprised you actually know this song. It's full of subtleties that I :>>>figured would be way over you head. :>>> :>>>Or do you just really like the guitar work? :>> :>> Yeah, being able to place the appropriate song in the correct place based :>> upon the current writing is so indicative of not understanding the :>> subtleties. :> :>Probably better than you. : :And your reading fails to make sense, as usual. : :Hint: You just insulted yourself, again. : :You are better at not understanding the subtleties. Well, I can see why you snipped that one, how embarrassing for you. : :> :>> :>> Now, here comes my fun part :>> :>> Go ahead detail the subtelties you feel David is expressing either :>> lyrically or musically. Give your take on where he was taking the :>> listener. Take as much space as you need. :> : :After declaring "It's full of subtleties that I figured would be way :over you head." The dodger fails to actually even know if there are :subtleties and in what way they are expressed. Being unfamiliar with :the song, he still felt he was an authority on the song, until he had :to man up: :>I'd have to listen to it again. I stopped playing a lot of that stuff :>years ago and progressed along the way. I play current stuff rather than :>staying stuck in the seventies. I also try not to use the same old lames :>from 20 years ago, too. Ooops! Too close, Chowderhead? : :Yes, the Xerox of music. Copy, copy, copy... : :And the music of PF, Waters & Gilmour transcend any era. Still awaiting those subtleties that you claim you can spot. Go ahead, give the song a listen, get back to me with that analysis. I'll make it easy, I won't even require you tie the plaintive tone of the guitar to the lyrics. You can just pick one. I also await the evidence you do not lick the Anus of Goats with STDs .. -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 2 May 2010 18:16 On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:04:59 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:41:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>> Funny how that one worked out. That whole ARPANET project being >>>> complete in 1975 and USENET not being invented until 1979 thought >>>> connection. >>> >>>And, I said I was using it...when? 1984, wasn't it? Where did 1979 come >>>from, Chowderhead? >>> >>>http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet_gateways.htm >> >> 1979 was when USENET was invented. DARPA was not involved with ARPANET in >> 1979. >> ""I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys >> are amateurs." > >Cling to it, Chowderhead. It may be the only factual thing you have to >hang me on. Like I said, we still called it DARPANet. Not being a computer >scientist, I didn't know the difference. > >Fact is, neither would you have. So, how many days and how many posts did it take for you to realize that every piece of information I stated was 100% accurate. goat fucker? Seriously, what kind of pathological goat fucker takes that many posts of repetitive head beatings to grasp 3 simple facts? That was all it was 3 pieces of data, easily found in many places and you refused to even consider that information you supposedly acquired over 25 years ago might have been incorrect. You were using your incorrect claim as proof that "You guys are amateurs.". Which begs the question, goat fucker, who was the actual amateur? The person that was 100% factually incorrect or the person that was provably 100% accurate? Take your time and think on it. Now for this posts "HACHIROKU GOAT FUCKER COWARDICE WATCH" Some serious spankage here, folks, the coward had to be extra snippy to make the bad words go away. :>Wrong. As usual. Guess you can't even use Google properly. :>http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet.htm : :Do, factual statement or not: :"Darpa ended the project and turned ARPANET over to Defense :Communications Agency in 1975" It was factual. : :> :>> :>> Funny how that one worked out. That whole ARPANET project being complete :>> in 1975 and USENET not being invented until 1979 thought connection. :> :>And, I said I was using it...when? 1984, wasn't it? Where did 1979 come :>from, Chowderhead? :> :>http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet_gateways.htm : :1979 was when USENET was invented. DARPA was not involved with ARPANET :in 1979. :""I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You :guys are amateurs." : :See, you claim that DARPA project was running USENET. : :That is impossible. DARPA was not running the ARPANET after 1975. If :they were no longer running ARPANET in 1975 then there is no way for :them to be running USENET in 1979 when USENET was invented. You came :along 4 years after USENET was invented and 8 years after DARPA had :ended its ARPANET project and turned it over to the Defense :Communications Agency. : :No project after 1975. So no way for this to be true: :"I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys :are amateurs." : :See USENET was never at any time part of the DARPA project. Never, not :at any time. It did run on ARPANET but that was an Infrastructure. Dayam, that musta caused some serious brainhertz. : :> :>> :>> So do you think if you tell enough lies one might accidentally turn out :>> to be true? :> :>Um, I think that's your ploy, Chowderhead. Maybe you think if you lie :>enough people will get confused, but it seems to be backfiring, doesn't it? :>You can't even keep the dates straight. : :I've pointed out numerous of your lies and yet you cannot point to :anything I write and say I am lying. You just claim I lie, not the :same thing. OWWWW : :Me: Evidence :You: More lying. Fact, you lie when you call others a liar, goat fucker. : :See below is a lie: :"I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You guys :are amateurs." : :> :>It took you 7 hours to reply. What did you do in the meantime, smack :>yourself in the head repeatedly with a Single-Jack mallet? Sure seems that :>way from here. : :Ah, you were sitting there refreshing and refreshing while I was out :and about with a friend. You just could not wait for my next missive. :It was consuming you as I made you wait those long an tortuous hours :between missives. The time eating holes in your stomach as the acid :and bile builds. So, how did that whole 7 hour thing work out? Win for the goat fucker? : :Well, I hope you are happier now? Stress under control? Blood pressure :down to just dangerously high? Well? : :> :>You don't get anywhere by backpedalling, Chowderhead. : :So, do you see any backpedalling, liar? No, he didn't which explains his admission of fault at the top. <preen> -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: The Greatest on 2 May 2010 20:48 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > coward.... > > I am an ignorant racist.... > > an ignorant racist.... > > an ignorant racist.... > > ignorant.... > > racist.... > > racist.... > > Ignorant :racist.... > > An empty headed twit.... > > An idiot.... > -- > King Rat Ratzio's main personality assets that he included in his last post to AUK.... -- HJ
From: The Greatest on 2 May 2010 20:54 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > "Translation: "I was too stupid to grasp what you were saying.".... > > Chowderhead.... > > Stump stupid.... > > Chowderhead.... > > A fool.... > -- > King Rat Ratzio confesses his most troubling personality traits.... -- HJ
From: The Greatest on 2 May 2010 20:58
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > > self serving solipsism.... > > *thought* process is unoriginal.... > goat fucker.... > > hypocrisy.... > > I also await to lick the Anus of Goats with STDs.... > -- > King Rat King Ko0k Ratzio sure has a "thing" for Goats.... -- HJ |