Motzarella stopped propegating messages...
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: Aratzio on 4 May 2010 21:52 On Tue, 04 May 2010 15:50:40 -0500, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >On Mon, 03 May 2010 23:57:39 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:42:23 -0500, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Mon, 03 May 2010 18:26:02 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 21:58:13 -0500, in the land of >>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >>>> double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:04:59 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:41:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Funny how that one worked out. That whole ARPANET project being >>>>>>>>> complete in 1975 and USENET not being invented until 1979 thought >>>>>>>>> connection. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And, I said I was using it...when? 1984, wasn't it? Where did 1979 >>>>>>>>come from, Chowderhead? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet_gateways.htm >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1979 was when USENET was invented. DARPA was not involved with >>>>>>> ARPANET in 1979. >>>>>>> ""I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You >>>>>>> guys are amateurs." >>>>>> >>>>>> Cling to it, Chowderhead. It may be the only factual thing you have >>>>>> to hang me on. Like I said, we still called it DARPANet. Not being a >>>>>> computer scientist, I didn't know the difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fact is, neither would you have. >>>>> >>>>>Even *I* knew the difference and I'm not a scientist either but I was >>>>>and am a computer *nerd*. >>>> >>>> He has to dismiss and minimize the fact he was wrong and it took him >>>> so many posts to spot that there were 3 simple facts espoused each and >>>> every time. >>>> >>>> He claimed I didn't have a clue. >>>> He claimed that the timeline was bullshit. He claimed I didn't have a >>>> clue about ARPANET He dissembled and snipped hoping to make it stop, >>>> >>>> In the end all he could do was fold like and accordion and try to >>>> minimize that fact he spent days literally denying 3 simple facts that >>>> could have been verified by a 10 year old in 30 seconds and google. >>>> >>>> Now that is a psychological pathology worthy of a journal paper. >>> >>>Sounds like a few others I've encountered on Usenet. It seems to >>>attract them. >> >> Always has. That fucker Dennis Ritchie... > >Yeah well, he cannot really be held accountable for the idiots who >use the system. Damn I miss my Unix Shell account! Actually a really funny guy. -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 4 May 2010 21:55 On Tue, 04 May 2010 15:58:21 -0500, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 04 May 2010 00:05:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:47:16 -0500, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:30:41 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 21:03:51 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the likes >>>>>>>> of you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it was part >>>>>>>> of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still stuck back >>>>>>>> in the early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>So you DO feel bullied. >>>>>> >>>>>> "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You >>>>>> guys are amateurs." >>>>>> >>>>>> DARPA ended its ARPANET project in 74/75 and turned it over to >>>>>> Defense Communications Agency (the *project* was complete. USENET >>>>>> was invented in 1979. He didn't have ARPANET access until at least >>>>>> 1983 when he was some gopher (probably didn't have any just worked >>>>>> somewhere that did). >>>>> >>>>> I always find it amusing when someone feels it is necessary to lie in >>>>> order to impress. >>>> >>>> So, prove I'm lying. >>> >>>You already showed everyone that you did. >> >> You know he may not be lying, it is entirely possible he is so stupid he >> can't tell the difference between an Agency and an Infrastructure. > >Possibly. However, I believe he really did make a *misstatement* as >he admitted to but can't quite bring himself to a) stop pursuing the >argument and/or b) apologize for his error. You did note he changed the statement to make it the network. -- Hachiroku taking a hard one: Message-ID: <43mnt5tag5jt9go58jqvnvuc3plud2k7n2(a)4ax.com> Hachiroku getting his "Jim Crow" on: Message-ID: <hrg1gu$jlo$8(a)news.eternal-september.org> "You're a good reason why there should be a literacy test given before voting rights are granted." Hachiroku proving his inate dishonesty, plagiarizing a quote from President Obama and not crediting it to the president: <truly sad when they cannot even discuss the facts without lying> Message-ID: <hrdtug$jr4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> Sure. Take a number get in line and we'll decide whether to keep you or not. Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: pandora on 4 May 2010 22:04 On Tue, 04 May 2010 18:52:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2010 15:50:40 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Mon, 03 May 2010 23:57:39 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:42:23 -0500, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >>> double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On Mon, 03 May 2010 18:26:02 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 21:58:13 -0500, in the land of >>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >>>>> double secret probation for writing: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:04:59 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 02:41:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Funny how that one worked out. That whole ARPANET project being >>>>>>>>>> complete in 1975 and USENET not being invented until 1979 >>>>>>>>>> thought connection. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>And, I said I was using it...when? 1984, wasn't it? Where did >>>>>>>>>1979 come from, Chowderhead? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_arpanet_gateways.htm >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1979 was when USENET was invented. DARPA was not involved with >>>>>>>> ARPANET in 1979. >>>>>>>> ""I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. >>>>>>>> You guys are amateurs." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cling to it, Chowderhead. It may be the only factual thing you >>>>>>> have to hang me on. Like I said, we still called it DARPANet. Not >>>>>>> being a computer scientist, I didn't know the difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fact is, neither would you have. >>>>>> >>>>>>Even *I* knew the difference and I'm not a scientist either but I >>>>>>was and am a computer *nerd*. >>>>> >>>>> He has to dismiss and minimize the fact he was wrong and it took him >>>>> so many posts to spot that there were 3 simple facts espoused each >>>>> and every time. >>>>> >>>>> He claimed I didn't have a clue. >>>>> He claimed that the timeline was bullshit. He claimed I didn't have >>>>> a clue about ARPANET He dissembled and snipped hoping to make it >>>>> stop, >>>>> >>>>> In the end all he could do was fold like and accordion and try to >>>>> minimize that fact he spent days literally denying 3 simple facts >>>>> that could have been verified by a 10 year old in 30 seconds and >>>>> google. >>>>> >>>>> Now that is a psychological pathology worthy of a journal paper. >>>> >>>>Sounds like a few others I've encountered on Usenet. It seems to >>>>attract them. >>> >>> Always has. That fucker Dennis Ritchie... >> >>Yeah well, he cannot really be held accountable for the idiots who use >>the system. Damn I miss my Unix Shell account! > > Actually a really funny guy. I believe it. I looked him up. He *looks* like he'd have a sense of humour.
From: pandora on 4 May 2010 22:06
On Tue, 04 May 2010 18:55:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2010 15:58:21 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Tue, 04 May 2010 00:05:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:47:16 -0500, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got >>> double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:30:41 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 21:03:51 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> As far as being bullied? I have a lot thicker skin than the >>>>>>>>> likes of you guys could penetrate. I've been on Usenet since it >>>>>>>>> was part of the DARPA project. You guys are amateurs. And, still >>>>>>>>> stuck back in the early 90's, based on the lames Ratzhole throws >>>>>>>>> out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So you DO feel bullied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "I've been on Usenet since it was part of the DARPA project. You >>>>>>> guys are amateurs." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DARPA ended its ARPANET project in 74/75 and turned it over to >>>>>>> Defense Communications Agency (the *project* was complete. USENET >>>>>>> was invented in 1979. He didn't have ARPANET access until at least >>>>>>> 1983 when he was some gopher (probably didn't have any just worked >>>>>>> somewhere that did). >>>>>> >>>>>> I always find it amusing when someone feels it is necessary to lie >>>>>> in order to impress. >>>>> >>>>> So, prove I'm lying. >>>> >>>>You already showed everyone that you did. >>> >>> You know he may not be lying, it is entirely possible he is so stupid >>> he can't tell the difference between an Agency and an Infrastructure. >> >>Possibly. However, I believe he really did make a *misstatement* as he >>admitted to but can't quite bring himself to a) stop pursuing the >>argument and/or b) apologize for his error. > > You did note he changed the statement to make it the network. I saw that. Amazing! |