Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: Aratzio on 30 Apr 2010 21:54 On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:42:22 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:44:49 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:42:30 -0400, Hachiroku wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>We need to start revving these kooks up because things are going to >>>>>return to normal around here in the near future and there is a huge >>>>>back-log of kookiness out there that needs to be celebrated. >>>> >>>> There is a dearth of quality kooks these days. Best we can work with >>>> are the lamers like the toyotatards at this point. >>> >>> >>> You're not exactly one to be qualifying who's a k00k and who's not. >>> You're about as k00ky as they come. >> >> Nah. Kooks are ones who don't recognize the rights of others. > >What "rights" don't I recognize? Explain, please. 14th, 4th, 6th. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 30 Apr 2010 21:55 On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:43:29 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:54:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>> >>>Who said I don't? You? >> >> Yes, she did and no you don't. You don't recognize the protections the >> Constitution provides. > >Of course I do. They broke the laws of the US. Tell me how they didn't. >What protection under the Constitution do illegals have? > QED The protections are provided citizens and you don't even recognize that. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 30 Apr 2010 22:04 On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:46:42 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:44:49 -0500, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double >> secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:42:30 -0400, Hachiroku wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>We need to start revving these kooks up because things are going to >>>>>>return to normal around here in the near future and there is a huge >>>>>>back-log of kookiness out there that needs to be celebrated. >>>>> >>>>> There is a dearth of quality kooks these days. Best we can work with >>>>> are the lamers like the toyotatards at this point. >>>> >>>> >>>> You're not exactly one to be qualifying who's a k00k and who's not. >>>> You're about as k00ky as they come. >>> >>>Nah. Kooks are ones who don't recognize the rights of others. >> >> He thinks he is being *kool* because he saw clockbrain use the word. Of >> course he should pay close attention and emulate clockbrain just as much >> as he can. > >I was using the word k00k when you were wondering why a 3.5" hard plastic >disk was called a "floppy". > I am sure that impresses toyotatards. Maybe you can hellp, I forget what was the memory location we had to load into the HP2100a tmemory register to start the boot process from the paper tape. 77740? -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Aratzio on 30 Apr 2010 22:12 On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:05:06 +0000, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Veronica Karlsson <veronica.karlsson(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >Hachiroku wrote: >> Veronica Karlsson wrote: >> >Hachiroku wrote: >> >> Aratzio wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> No, but he's a mentally deranged idiot. >> >> >> That applies to 99.9% of the people in this thread... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, we can add math to your ever lengthening list of things you do not >> >> > understand. >> >> >> >> Here's a hint: You are NOT in the .1% >> > >> > Here's a hint: Neither are you. >> >> Wanna bet? > >How many are "the people in this thread"? Something like 10? Certainly >much fewer than 100. That means each person = 10%. People are integers. >There's no such thing as, for example, "0.34 people". > >You seem to have *wanted* it to mean something like "everybody except >Hachiroku is stupid", but then you'd have to say "90% of the people in >this thread". For your statement to actually mean what you seemed to >want it to mean there would have had to be 1000 people in this thread. > >> Nice sig. Nope, no ko00kiness there! > >If you comment on the sig of the post you reply to you should not snip >it. That was just mean, pointing out all that high level math. You are one of those eeducated elitist snobs showing him up like that. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: The Greatest on 30 Apr 2010 22:25
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:fu1nt59pel4r1si670fbpimk6cjcoojetr(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:27:03 -0400, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> > got double secret probation for writing: > > >On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:50:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > > > >>>> The stAUKers get really excited when one of their own makes a public > >>>> apology like meat plow did yesterday.....they are "running scared" > >>>> right now !! -- > >>>> HJ > >>> > >>>I just can't bring myself to look. > >> > >> Not that you would actually be able to parse the English. > > > >I don't seem to be the one here with that problem. > > Introspection is not one of your strengths. > -- > King Rat Logical thinking is not one of your strengths either, Ratz !! -- HJ |