Motzarella stopped propegating messages...
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: EPIC TEA PARTY FAIL
Next: Crash Course
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Apr 2010 03:42 On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:44:49 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:42:30 -0400, Hachiroku wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>We need to start revving these kooks up because things are going to >>>>return to normal around here in the near future and there is a huge >>>>back-log of kookiness out there that needs to be celebrated. >>> >>> There is a dearth of quality kooks these days. Best we can work with >>> are the lamers like the toyotatards at this point. >> >> >> You're not exactly one to be qualifying who's a k00k and who's not. >> You're about as k00ky as they come. > > Nah. Kooks are ones who don't recognize the rights of others. What "rights" don't I recognize? Explain, please.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Apr 2010 03:43 On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:54:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>Who said I don't? You? > > Yes, she did and no you don't. You don't recognize the protections the > Constitution provides. Of course I do. They broke the laws of the US. Tell me how they didn't. What protection under the Constitution do illegals have?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Apr 2010 03:45 On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:47:53 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:26:24 -0400, Hachiroku wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:44:49 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:42:30 -0400, Hachiroku wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>We need to start revving these kooks up because things are going to >>>>>>return to normal around here in the near future and there is a huge >>>>>>back-log of kookiness out there that needs to be celebrated. >>>>> >>>>> There is a dearth of quality kooks these days. Best we can work with >>>>> are the lamers like the toyotatards at this point. >>>> >>>> >>>> You're not exactly one to be qualifying who's a k00k and who's not. >>>> You're about as k00ky as they come. >>> >>> Nah. Kooks are ones who don't recognize the rights of others. >> >> >> Who said I don't? You? > > Certainly looks that way. > >> They have rights. The right to get the hell out of the country they came >> into illegally and apply for residency like millions of others have. > > You still haven't answered my question as to HOW one is going to know an > individual is a citizen or resident alien or illegal just by looking at > them. And *asking* for proof on a whim does abridge individual rights. > >> Am I supposed to feel sorry for these people, and why should I? > > Nope. Not asking for that. Just that laws don't discriminate against > those who *look* different. Where did I say anything about looks? I did say something about k00ks, but not looks. > >> Think if I went to Canada illegally I'd have millions of people wringing >> their hands? > > No, of course not. However, I would like that you weren't subjected to > discrimination. > >> Explain to me why people who cvame into this country illegally should be >> allowed to stay. Bear in mind a good number of them are criminals in >> their own countries, and not just for speaking up. Drugs, guns, >> trafficking in minors, etc. > > Ah, the old, they're criminals anyway, ploy. Probably up to 20% of them are. Of course, they ALL are if they are here without going through proper channels. Now, why should that be rewarded?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Apr 2010 03:46 On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:44:49 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double > secret probation for writing: > >>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:42:30 -0400, Hachiroku wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>We need to start revving these kooks up because things are going to >>>>>return to normal around here in the near future and there is a huge >>>>>back-log of kookiness out there that needs to be celebrated. >>>> >>>> There is a dearth of quality kooks these days. Best we can work with >>>> are the lamers like the toyotatards at this point. >>> >>> >>> You're not exactly one to be qualifying who's a k00k and who's not. >>> You're about as k00ky as they come. >> >>Nah. Kooks are ones who don't recognize the rights of others. > > He thinks he is being *kool* because he saw clockbrain use the word. Of > course he should pay close attention and emulate clockbrain just as much > as he can. I was using the word k00k when you were wondering why a 3.5" hard plastic disk was called a "floppy".
From: Veronica Karlsson on 30 Apr 2010 05:05
Hachiroku wrote: > Veronica Karlsson wrote: > >Hachiroku wrote: > >> Aratzio wrote: > >> > >> >>> No, but he's a mentally deranged idiot. > >> >> That applies to 99.9% of the people in this thread... > >> >> > >> >> > >> > So, we can add math to your ever lengthening list of things you do not > >> > understand. > >> > >> Here's a hint: You are NOT in the .1% > > > > Here's a hint: Neither are you. > > Wanna bet? How many are "the people in this thread"? Something like 10? Certainly much fewer than 100. That means each person = 10%. People are integers. There's no such thing as, for example, "0.34 people". You seem to have *wanted* it to mean something like "everybody except Hachiroku is stupid", but then you'd have to say "90% of the people in this thread". For your statement to actually mean what you seemed to want it to mean there would have had to be 1000 people in this thread. > Nice sig. Nope, no ko00kiness there! If you comment on the sig of the post you reply to you should not snip it. -- __ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __ ||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \ ||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \ |.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \ _\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\ |_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___| |