From: Mike Hunter on
I find it strange that any engine that consumes four quarts of oil 5,000
miles would even start LOL

"jim" <".sjedgingN0sp"@m(a)mwt.net> wrote in message
news:1227899786_204(a)isp.n...
>
>
> SMS wrote:
>>
>> jim wrote:
>>

>>The only time I recall it being used on a relatively modern car
>> was on one vehicle that was a notorious oil burner, and 3000 mile
>> changes were because so many owners never checked their oil and found
>> their cars with less than 1 quart of oil left after 5000 miles.
---


From: Nate Nagel on
huh? that's a quart every 1250 miles. not at all unusual for an older
design engine with a few miles on it.

nate

Mike Hunter wrote:
> I find it strange that any engine that consumes four quarts of oil 5,000
> miles would even start LOL
>
> "jim" <".sjedgingN0sp"@m(a)mwt.net> wrote in message
> news:1227899786_204(a)isp.n...
>>
>> SMS wrote:
>>> jim wrote:
>>>
>
>>> The only time I recall it being used on a relatively modern car
>>> was on one vehicle that was a notorious oil burner, and 3000 mile
>>> changes were because so many owners never checked their oil and found
>>> their cars with less than 1 quart of oil left after 5000 miles.
> ---
>
>


--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
From: jim on


SMS wrote:
Yes, the person doing
> 3000 oil changes is ignoring an enormous body of evidences that such
> changes are wasteful in both money and resources,

No for me it isn't. I have a friend who believes oil requires a several 1000
miles of driving before it reaches it's peak performance value. So after
"breaking in" the oil I sell it to him at a modest profit.

-jim


----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
From: Ray O on

"Mark A" <someone(a)someone.com> wrote in message
news:Z7MXk.1064$YU6.1012(a)bignews8.bellsouth.net...
> "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in message
> news:ggntr1$oth$1(a)news.motzarella.org...
>> I use synthetic oil in 2 out of 4 cars. Obviously, I don't have anything
>> against synthetic oil since I use it myself. The part I disagree on is
>> that using synthetic saves money when following the factory recommended
>> oil change intervals.
>
> Let's face it Ray, you disagree with everything I have ever posted on this
> forum, for reasons that have nothing to do with the substance of my posts.
> You previously posted that you use synthetic is all 3 or your cars, but
> obviously things have changed since then (number of cars has changed, and
> number that you synthetic in).
>

I don't disagree with everything you have ever posted, just when your facts
are incorrect or when our opinions differ.

I would not have posted that I use synthetic in all three cars because I do
not. You can search my previous posts, and if you find where I posted that,
I will humbly admit my error in that post. We got a good deal on a '97
Escort in the past year so we're up to four vehicles. The Escort does not
get synthetic oil.

BTW, I have not singled out your posts to look for errors so please do not
take contratictions or corrections personally. I have pointed out errors in
posts from Hachiroku, TeGGeR, and several others, and have managed to
maintain a cordial relationship with them. They are not offended when I
contradict them, and likewise, I am not offended when they or others point
out my mistakes.

> No one knows for sure how much synthetic oil will save you, if any. You
> could recoup some or all of the cost if you sold the car yourself, and
> provided receipts that showed you always used synthetic for every oil
> change. You might get 1% better gas mileage. You might avoid a repair that
> would have otherwise been necessary. It is hard to say.

I agree.

>
> I have more liability insurance than the state requires (hundreds of
> thousands more). Do I need that much insurance? Will I save money by
> having more insurance? Probably not, but it you never know. I pay a lot
> more for the extra liability insurance than I do for the synthetic oil. In
> fact, I pay more money for Twinkies every year (which I definitely don't
> need) than I pay for synthetic oil. According to Wikipedia, there was $61
> billion USD spent worldwide on bottled water in 2006, and people are
> complaining that I am wasting $30 per year on synthetic oil?
>
> $30 extra per year for synthetic oil is very cheap insurance IMO.
> Admittedly, if you only have your car for 3 years and trade it in, or it
> goes back to dealer after the lease expires, then maybe it will not pay
> off. But debating about that small amount of money is ridiculous IMO.
>
I also used to pay a lot more for Twinkies than for oil changes (and cars
too), but my employer did not reimburse for or issue Twinkies.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)


From: SMS on
Mike Hunter wrote:
> I find it strange that any engine that consumes four quarts of oil 5,000
> miles would even start LOL

The engine won't self destruct on 1 quart of oil. My relative was pretty
funny when he described these vehicles. Until he had done a couple of
these cars he thought that either the oil was leaking out somewhere.


>
> "jim" <".sjedgingN0sp"@m(a)mwt.net> wrote in message
> news:1227899786_204(a)isp.n...
>>
>> SMS wrote:
>>> jim wrote:
>>>
>
>>> The only time I recall it being used on a relatively modern car
>>> was on one vehicle that was a notorious oil burner, and 3000 mile
>>> changes were because so many owners never checked their oil and found
>>> their cars with less than 1 quart of oil left after 5000 miles.
> ---
>
>