{BS} Sarah Palin has her notes in her palm again
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Yeni Albümler Full Tek Link (Fuat-Gökhan Türkmen-Teoman-KralFm Top20)
Next: Recommendations for mid-size car for senior fellow?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Apr 2010 23:21 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:hpu3es$4bv$4(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:17:50 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message >> news:7nd4s5579aptakmo0fji6qb06uh253p36j(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:25:40 -0400, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got >>> double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:24:27 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language and speak for 17 >>>>>>>minutes off the cuff with almost perfect pronounciation, diction and >>>>>>>syntax is clearly evident the teleprompter is his crutch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >>>>> >>>>> So what is your "cogizent level" today? >>>>> >>>>> So what is the negative of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, >>>>> specifically? >>>> >>>> >>> <Hachoo present red herring to avoid answering question> >>>>What's wrong with having your notes in your palm? A lot of people use >>>>index cards. One has to take a teleprompter to the sixth grade with him. >>>> >>> So, the lie about the sixth grade stuck regardless of what the reporters >>> that were there said? >>> >>> Really? You actually think he used the teleprompter to address 6th >>> graders? Have you examined that thought even slightly? >>> >>> Here is your hint: >>> The schedule:: >>> 1. Arrival >>> 2. Prepared remarks about education reform to reporters. 3. Hang out >>> with 6th graders and take questions. >>> >>> So at what point in time do you imagine a teleprompter would be of use? >>> You believe it is when taking questions from 6th graders. >>> >>> Really, 2 minutes and you could have known "teleprompters and 6th >>> graders" was a lie made up by people who were not there claiming a >>> picture proved he used the teleprompter to address the 6th graders. >>> >>> As for writing on your hand, explain how putting your most basic talking >>> points on your hand is the same as using a teleprompter to deliver >>> prepared remarks? >>> >>> Note the words "most basic". One was "Tax Cuts". Is there ANY republican >>> or Democrat that would need to have that talking point written on their >>> hand when answering questions that had been already screened and >>> presented to them before they were asked? >>> >>> Yes, Palin was answering questions that were pre-screened for her and by >>> her. And she needed to have her most basic responses written on her >>> hand. She could not remember that one was "tax cuts". How stupid do you >>> have to be that the basis for almost every republican proposal, tax >>> cuts, needed to be written on your hand? >>> >>> Obama spoke for 17 minutes to an unscreened question. Palin had to write >>> "tax cuts" on her hand to answer a question she knew was coming. >>> >>> Hilarious thing is you cannot see the difference. >>> >>> >>> Now, back to the question you failed to answer: So what is the negative >>> of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, specifically? >>> >>> (You can keep running, but you cannot hide from the facts). >> >> >> What's hilarious about all this is that the Hack has never attended a >> prepared speech by ANYONE with a long list of things to discuss. If he >> had, he wouldn't be complaining about the specific METHOD used by >> speakers >> to keep their talking points straight. >> >> Here's who I've seen (in person) using notes (so far): >> >> - William Westmoreland >> - Jack Welch >> - Lee Iacocca >> - Mario Cuomo >> - Peter Norton >> - Dan Bricklin >> - Alfred Eisenstadt >> - Philip Roth > > You left out Sarah Palin. She writes them on the palm of her hand in order > to remind her what *speaking* points she wants to make. Not to remind her > waht to look for on the teleprompter. Her complete inability to handle her speaking points proves that her hand is ineffective.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Apr 2010 23:21 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:45:12 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:26:51 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:02:01 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:38:52 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:54:46 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>With this empty suited Bambi, you can't believe a damend thing he >>>>>>says! >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language <SLAP!> >>>> >>>> Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >>>> >>>> So, the Pres talked for 17 whole minutes. Wanna go through all the >>>> YouTubes where he was saying "ah, um, er, ah, er" for about 10 of >>>> those minutes? >>>> >>>> You're as bad as Meredith Viera. I thought she was going to suck him >>>> off in the middle of an interview last year. >>>> >>>> The man's a Harvard Law graduate. He should be able to talk for HOURS >>>> without a teleprompter. But he can't. >>> >>> The shrub couldn't talk for even 5 minutes without looking like and >>> sounding like an idiot. >> >> >> But he did it without reading. > > Perhaps he didn't know how to read? Could be.... > >> I'm not a Bush fan, and thought he was dumb, but I'm beginning to think >> he was a genius by comparison. > > Then I have great sympathy for you. And I have great sympathy for the people STILL in "The Trance" of the empty suit in office.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Apr 2010 23:22 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:12:14 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:26:51 -0400, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:02:01 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:38:52 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:54:46 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>With this empty suited Bambi, you can't believe a damend thing he >>>>>>says! >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language <SLAP!> >>>> >>>> Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >>>> >>>> So, the Pres talked for 17 whole minutes. Wanna go through all the >>>> YouTubes where he was saying "ah, um, er, ah, er" for about 10 of >>>> those minutes? >>>> >>>> You're as bad as Meredith Viera. I thought she was going to suck him >>>> off in the middle of an interview last year. >>>> >>>> The man's a Harvard Law graduate. He should be able to talk for HOURS >>>> without a teleprompter. But he can't. >>> >>> The shrub couldn't talk for even 5 minutes without looking like and >>> sounding like an idiot. >> >> >>But he did it without reading. > > He did everything without reading. Like the National Intelligence Review > that told him Osama Bin Laden was ggoing to attack the US mainland. > >>I'm not a Bush fan, and thought he was dumb, but I'm beginning to think >>he was a genius by comparison. > > Are you claiming Bush did not use a teleprompter or that he was too stupid > to read from the teleprompter. Could be... > > Simple enough question, go ahead, clarify your statement. > > <hachoo will run away>
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Apr 2010 23:23 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:45:54 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:28:53 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:43:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>The shrub couldn't talk for even 5 minutes without looking like and >>>>sounding like an idiot. >>> >>> Nixon used "ah" even when he used his teleprompter. >> >> Wow. You need to actually listen to your feerless leeder. Without his >> teleprompter, he's as bad as Bush. >> >> And not just an "ah..er.."once in a while. He once answered a question >> with 10 words and about 2 dozen ah...er..um... >> >> Worse than Kennedy, "The Wizard of Uuuhs". > > Which Kennedy? JFK sounded okay to me. JFK was a great man. I mean the "swimmer".
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Apr 2010 23:24
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:17:38 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>Worse than Kennedy, "The Wizard of Uuuhs". > > Wow, so most of the previous presidents all used rhetorical devices to > allow themselves to formulate their responses while speaking > extemporaneously. > > HORRORS!!!!! Um, where did I say that was bad, exactly. Like, note cards or writing on your hand? OK, fine. Needing a teleprompter everywhere you go? A bit different. |