{BS} Sarah Palin has her notes in her palm again
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Yeni Albümler Full Tek Link (Fuat-Gökhan Türkmen-Teoman-KralFm Top20)
Next: Recommendations for mid-size car for senior fellow?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Apr 2010 17:03 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:hptb84$dos$5(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:24:27 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>>Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language and speak for 17 >>>>minutes off the cuff with almost perfect pronounciation, diction and >>>>syntax is clearly evident the teleprompter is his crutch. >>>> >>>> >>>Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >> >> So what is your "cogizent level" today? >> >> So what is the negative of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, >> specifically? > > What's wrong with having your notes in your palm? A lot of people use > index cards. One has to take a teleprompter to the sixth grade with him. -Teleprompter -Notes in palm -Index cards All the same thing. You will now disagree because something else is bothering you today. Did Brad Paisley not pay you the royalties he promised for letting you star at the pizza guy in his "Online" music video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE6iAjEv9dQ Your mom and one of your cars are in the video, too.
From: Aratzio on 11 Apr 2010 17:07 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:25:40 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:24:27 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>>Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language and speak for 17 >>>>minutes off the cuff with almost perfect pronounciation, diction and >>>>syntax is clearly evident the teleprompter is his crutch. >>>> >>>> >>>Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >> >> So what is your "cogizent level" today? >> >> So what is the negative of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, >> specifically? > <Hachoo present red herring to avoid answering question> >What's wrong with having your notes in your palm? A lot of people use >index cards. One has to take a teleprompter to the sixth grade with him. > So, the lie about the sixth grade stuck regardless of what the reporters that were there said? Really? You actually think he used the teleprompter to address 6th graders? Have you examined that thought even slightly? Here is your hint: The schedule:: 1. Arrival 2. Prepared remarks about education reform to reporters. 3. Hang out with 6th graders and take questions. So at what point in time do you imagine a teleprompter would be of use? You believe it is when taking questions from 6th graders. Really, 2 minutes and you could have known "teleprompters and 6th graders" was a lie made up by people who were not there claiming a picture proved he used the teleprompter to address the 6th graders. As for writing on your hand, explain how putting your most basic talking points on your hand is the same as using a teleprompter to deliver prepared remarks? Note the words "most basic". One was "Tax Cuts". Is there ANY republican or Democrat that would need to have that talking point written on their hand when answering questions that had been already screened and presented to them before they were asked? Yes, Palin was answering questions that were pre-screened for her and by her. And she needed to have her most basic responses written on her hand. She could not remember that one was "tax cuts". How stupid do you have to be that the basis for almost every republican proposal, tax cuts, needed to be written on your hand? Obama spoke for 17 minutes to an unscreened question. Palin had to write "tax cuts" on her hand to answer a question she knew was coming. Hilarious thing is you cannot see the difference. Now, back to the question you failed to answer: So what is the negative of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, specifically? (You can keep running, but you cannot hide from the facts). -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees...
From: Aratzio on 11 Apr 2010 17:12 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:26:51 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:02:01 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:38:52 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:54:46 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>With this empty suited Bambi, you can't believe a damend thing he says! >>>> >>>> Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language <SLAP!> >>> >>> Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >>> >>> So, the Pres talked for 17 whole minutes. Wanna go through all the >>> YouTubes where he was saying "ah, um, er, ah, er" for about 10 of those >>> minutes? >>> >>> You're as bad as Meredith Viera. I thought she was going to suck him off >>> in the middle of an interview last year. >>> >>> The man's a Harvard Law graduate. He should be able to talk for HOURS >>> without a teleprompter. But he can't. >> >> The shrub couldn't talk for even 5 minutes without looking like and >> sounding like an idiot. > > >But he did it without reading. He did everything without reading. Like the National Intelligence Review that told him Osama Bin Laden was ggoing to attack the US mainland. >I'm not a Bush fan, and thought he was dumb, but I'm beginning to think he >was a genius by comparison. Are you claiming Bush did not use a teleprompter or that he was too stupid to read from the teleprompter. Simple enough question, go ahead, clarify your statement. <hachoo will run away> -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees...
From: Aratzio on 11 Apr 2010 17:17 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:28:53 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:43:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>The shrub couldn't talk for even 5 minutes without looking like and >>>sounding like an idiot. >> >> Nixon used "ah" even when he used his teleprompter. > >Wow. You need to actually listen to your feerless leeder. >Without his teleprompter, he's as bad as Bush. No, Obama uses English and has a specific tick in his extempraneous speaking style. Bush, like you, was an ignorant nozzle who only had a slight connection to the English language.. > >And not just an "ah..er.."once in a while. He once answered a question >with 10 words and about 2 dozen ah...er..um... Yes, and that indicates what, specifically? Define the issue as you see it. What is the negative of that verbal tick? Do you think a verbal tick is indicative of intelligence? Does that mean he is somehow less intelligent than someone that during pre-screeden question and answer session needed to write the most basic talking points on her hand? > >Worse than Kennedy, "The Wizard of Uuuhs". Wow, so most of the previous presidents all used rhetorical devices to allow themselves to formulate their responses while speaking extemporaneously. HORRORS!!!!! -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees...
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Apr 2010 17:17
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:7nd4s5579aptakmo0fji6qb06uh253p36j(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:25:40 -0400, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> > got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:24:27 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>>Yeah, that whole ability to use the English language and speak for 17 >>>>>minutes off the cuff with almost perfect pronounciation, diction and >>>>>syntax is clearly evident the teleprompter is his crutch. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Coming from someone who clearly doesn't understand it. >>> >>> So what is your "cogizent level" today? >>> >>> So what is the negative of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, >>> specifically? >> > > <Hachoo present red herring to avoid answering question> >>What's wrong with having your notes in your palm? A lot of people use >>index cards. One has to take a teleprompter to the sixth grade with him. >> > So, the lie about the sixth grade stuck regardless of what the > reporters that were there said? > > Really? You actually think he used the teleprompter to address 6th > graders? Have you examined that thought even slightly? > > Here is your hint: > The schedule:: > 1. Arrival > 2. Prepared remarks about education reform to reporters. > 3. Hang out with 6th graders and take questions. > > So at what point in time do you imagine a teleprompter would be of > use? You believe it is when taking questions from 6th graders. > > Really, 2 minutes and you could have known "teleprompters and 6th > graders" was a lie made up by people who were not there claiming a > picture proved he used the teleprompter to address the 6th graders. > > As for writing on your hand, explain how putting your most basic > talking points on your hand is the same as using a teleprompter to > deliver prepared remarks? > > Note the words "most basic". One was "Tax Cuts". Is there ANY > republican or Democrat that would need to have that talking point > written on their hand when answering questions that had been already > screened and presented to them before they were asked? > > Yes, Palin was answering questions that were pre-screened for her and > by her. And she needed to have her most basic responses written on her > hand. She could not remember that one was "tax cuts". How stupid do > you have to be that the basis for almost every republican proposal, > tax cuts, needed to be written on your hand? > > Obama spoke for 17 minutes to an unscreened question. > Palin had to write "tax cuts" on her hand to answer a question she > knew was coming. > > Hilarious thing is you cannot see the difference. > > > Now, back to the question you failed to answer: > So what is the negative of using a teleprompter for prepared remarks, > specifically? > > (You can keep running, but you cannot hide from the facts). What's hilarious about all this is that the Hack has never attended a prepared speech by ANYONE with a long list of things to discuss. If he had, he wouldn't be complaining about the specific METHOD used by speakers to keep their talking points straight. Here's who I've seen (in person) using notes (so far): - William Westmoreland - Jack Welch - Lee Iacocca - Mario Cuomo - Peter Norton - Dan Bricklin - Alfred Eisenstadt - Philip Roth |