From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:53:04 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:16:08 -0500, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:42:47 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>>
>>>>hey, if i'd not bothered to check, and if i didn't have the integrity
>>>>to admit that, maybe i'd make such an underinformed comment too.
>>>
>>>
>>> For every warranty repair needed on a Toyota, how many warranty repairs
>>> do you think are needed on a Ford?
>>
>>You have got to be kidding...
>>
>>I'd bet it's at least 3 to 1.
>>
>>
>>
> Go read the JD power data and covert it to defects per CAR, not per 100
> cars, and you'll see just how little actual difference there is between
> any of the cars in the top half of the food chain.

Are these the "Initial Quality Surveys"? Any new car I get better pass one
of these, because they're conducted within three months of buying a car.

If a car can't pass one of these in 90 days, the automaker needs to go out
of business.

But, the governemt shored up GM, didn't they?



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:40:45 -0600, Steve wrote:

> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:42:47 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>>
>>>> hey, if i'd not bothered to check, and if i didn't have the integrity
>>>> to admit that, maybe i'd make such an underinformed comment too.
>>>
>>> For every warranty repair needed on a Toyota, how many warranty repairs
>>> do you think are needed on a Ford?
>>
>> You have got to be kidding...
>>
>> I'd bet it's at least 3 to 1.
>
> I'd say thats about right. 3 Toy repairs for every 1 Ford repair.

Sure Whatever you say. Putz.

From: Ashton Crusher on
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:14:16 -0800, jim beam <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:

>On 02/16/2010 09:53 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:16:08 -0500, Hachiroku ????<Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:42:47 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>>>
>>>>> hey, if i'd not bothered to check, and if i didn't have the integrity to
>>>>> admit that, maybe i'd make such an underinformed comment too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For every warranty repair needed on a Toyota, how many warranty repairs do
>>>> you think are needed on a Ford?
>>>
>>> You have got to be kidding...
>>>
>>> I'd bet it's at least 3 to 1.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Go read the JD power data and covert it to defects per CAR, not per
>> 100 cars, and you'll see just how little actual difference there is
>> between any of the cars in the top half of the food chain.
>
>durng the first few months of the vehicle's life - the bit they survey.
> if you keep a vehicle longer than that, you'll see a whole different
>reality. especially if you go to a junkyard and see all the 10 year old
>domestics lined up.


You need to give up the bottle.
From: jim beam on
On 02/17/2010 09:33 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:14:16 -0800, jim beam<me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> On 02/16/2010 09:53 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:16:08 -0500, Hachiroku ????<Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:42:47 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> hey, if i'd not bothered to check, and if i didn't have the integrity to
>>>>>> admit that, maybe i'd make such an underinformed comment too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For every warranty repair needed on a Toyota, how many warranty repairs do
>>>>> you think are needed on a Ford?
>>>>
>>>> You have got to be kidding...
>>>>
>>>> I'd bet it's at least 3 to 1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Go read the JD power data and covert it to defects per CAR, not per
>>> 100 cars, and you'll see just how little actual difference there is
>>> between any of the cars in the top half of the food chain.
>>
>> durng the first few months of the vehicle's life - the bit they survey.
>> if you keep a vehicle longer than that, you'll see a whole different
>> reality. especially if you go to a junkyard and see all the 10 year old
>> domestics lined up.
>
>
> You need to give up the bottle.

the bottle marked "reality" that makes me call a spade a spade? you
need to give up the bottle marked "self delusion is indistinguishable
from gullibility".


--
nomina rutrum rutrum
From: Toyota on
On Feb 11, 6:29 pm, john <johngd...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yoshi Inaba sounds like a clairvoyant. ;)  I wonder if there will be
> charges and arrests in the Toyota case as the Japanese government did
> in the Mitsubishi case.
>
> "For years, warning signs have clashed with its touted high standards
>
> Five years ago, Yoshi Inaba, then president of Toyota Motor Corp.'s
> U.S. sales operations, disclosed his biggest fear. It was that
> someday, some flaw in Toyota vehicles might go undetected and cause
> injuries, or worse, to the company's customers.
>
> Inaba was perhaps thinking of a huge scandal that had just engulfed
> Mitsubishi Motors Corp., a smaller Japanese carmaker accused of
> covering up defects for years. Top Mitsubishi executives, including
> its former president, had been arrested and charged."
>
> From The Detroit News:http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20100211/OPINION01/2110340/1148/au...

Is your vehicle involved?

2005-2010 Avalon
2009-2010 RAV4
2007-2010 Camry
2008-2010 Sequoia
2009-2010 Corolla
2005-2010 Tacoma
2008-2010 Highlander
2007-2010 Tundra
2009-2010 Matrix
2009-2010 VENZA
2004-2009 Prius
2010 Lexus HS 250h
2007-2010 Lexus ES350
2006-2010 Lexus IS250s
2006-2010 Lexus IS350s

Get the Latest Facts at http://www.ToyotaBrakeRecall.org