Total Farce
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Boxer Shorts
Next: Toyota drags down new-vehicle quality average; Ford leads Detroit 3 gains, J.D. Power says
From: SaPeIsMa on 23 Jun 2010 15:58 "Morgan Vening" <morgan(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:14j226l6srrbem302pdoao85ad1eihjfck(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:17 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antikerry(a)go.com> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>And? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to >>>>>>>>>>>stop >>>>>>>>>>>the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it >>>>>>>>>>>was...delicious." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>A man of action. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >>>>>>>>> >>> Therein lies the problem. The "fuckers" will simply jack up pump prices >>> and the innocent public becomes the "fuckers". Corporations rarely get >>> hurt by fines and never pay taxes. The cost is simply passed on and we >>> pay >>> out of our pocket. >>> >>ALL COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ARE PAID BY THE END CONSUMER. A fact liberals >>are incapable of learning. > > In a monopoly or oligopoly, yes. In a true "free market", not so much. Actually ALL of so much A company ALWAYS pays all of it's costs out of revenues, And the revenue comes from sales And sales come from the CONSUMER The ONLY exception is when government SUBSIDIZES a business directly or indirectly In which case the subsidy (aka TAXPAYER MONEY) covers it's costs rest of ignorance deleted
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 23 Jun 2010 16:06 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:00:51 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:00:51 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 06:25:14 +0000, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:06:33 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:06:33 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >> wrote: >> >>>> Rethugs want poor BP left alone & for the government to pay. >>> >>> Who says that? Cite please. >> >> You really should get out more often, watch TV or read a newspaper. No >> one needs cater to your ignorance of exceedingly well published news. > > > I read the papers, watch the news, and listen to the radio constantly. I > have no idea what you're talking about. WHO says anything about the > gummint paying for it? > > I gewt the impression you either misunderstood, or like most Obungler > supporters, are just delusional. I'll even give you a hint, "Joe Barton." -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Jack Abramoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 Jun 2010 18:14 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:04:33 -0400, Zombywoof wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:53:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:17 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antikerry(a)go.com> >>wrote: >> >> >>>"RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote in message >>>news:iQ7Un.228323$pj7.38157(a)en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com... >>>> >>>> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9D9F7E14BAECFWereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >>>>> Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:40h126dna4msgl8pv657u58s7lad7afav7(a)4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:26:03 -0400, "Lord Gow 333, not a White House >>>>>> approved poster!" <lordgow(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:v9bt161rv7phf2ko818p57lrlfh69n5i32(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:49:53 -0500, Fred Hall <fkhall(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:04:28 -0400, Hachiroku ???? >>>>>>>>><Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>And? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to >>>>>>>>>>>>stop the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it >>>>>>>>>>>>was...delicious." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>A man of action. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >>>>>>>>>> >>>> Therein lies the problem. The "fuckers" will simply jack up pump >>>> prices and the innocent public becomes the "fuckers". Corporations >>>> rarely get hurt by fines and never pay taxes. The cost is simply >>>> passed on and we pay out of our pocket. >>>> >>>ALL COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ARE PAID BY THE END CONSUMER. A fact >>>liberals are incapable of learning. >>> >>So you're saying BP SHOULDN'T have to pay? Is that it? >> > No, he is saying that ultimately it will be B.P's customers who pay. > Please try to keep up. It's like when the Progressives talk about putting outrageous taxes on company's profits. Yeah. Sure the *companies* are going to pay them.
From: Cliff on 23 Jun 2010 19:12 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:02:04 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:01:14 -0400, Cliff wrote: > >>>> Found those "WMDs" yet? >>> >>>Yup. Empty Suit, with a matching head. >> >> Well <tapping foot>, show them to us or be caught out a lying winger. > >OK: > >http://eebatou.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/barack-obama.jpg > >empty suit, empty head. > > Find those "WMDs" yet? -- Cliff
From: Lookout on 23 Jun 2010 22:02
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:04:33 -0400, Zombywoof <fishwings(a)live.com> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:53:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:17 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antikerry(a)go.com> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>"RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote in message >>>news:iQ7Un.228323$pj7.38157(a)en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com... >>>> >>>> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9D9F7E14BAECFWereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >>>>> Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:40h126dna4msgl8pv657u58s7lad7afav7(a)4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:26:03 -0400, "Lord Gow 333, not a White House >>>>>> approved poster!" <lordgow(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:v9bt161rv7phf2ko818p57lrlfh69n5i32(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:49:53 -0500, Fred Hall <fkhall(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:04:28 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>And? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to stop >>>>>>>>>>>>the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it >>>>>>>>>>>>was...delicious." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>A man of action. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >>>>>>>>>> >>>> Therein lies the problem. The "fuckers" will simply jack up pump prices >>>> and the innocent public becomes the "fuckers". Corporations rarely get >>>> hurt by fines and never pay taxes. The cost is simply passed on and we pay >>>> out of our pocket. >>>> >>>ALL COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ARE PAID BY THE END CONSUMER. A fact liberals >>>are incapable of learning. >>> >>So you're saying BP SHOULDN'T have to pay? Is that it? >> >No, he is saying that ultimately it will be B.P's customers who pay. I know what he said. I was wondering what he meant. Like so many conservatives who think the tax payers should have to pay >Please try to keep up. I am. But he could have been siding the many republicans. I guess you missed that. |