Total Farce
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Boxer Shorts
Next: Toyota drags down new-vehicle quality average; Ford leads Detroit 3 gains, J.D. Power says
From: % on 23 Jun 2010 22:19 LETS DO THE CROSSPOST AGAIN
From: Gray Ghost on 23 Jun 2010 23:00 Zombywoof <fishwings(a)live.com> wrote in news:b61526paip1ud4btakp0vl94bkce5qviap(a)4ax.com: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:53:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:17 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antikerry(a)go.com> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>"RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote in message >>>news:iQ7Un.228323$pj7.38157(a)en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com... >>>> >>>> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9D9F7E14BAECFWereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >>>>> Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:40h126dna4msgl8pv657u58s7lad7afav7(a)4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:26:03 -0400, "Lord Gow 333, not a White House >>>>>> approved poster!" <lordgow(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:v9bt161rv7phf2ko818p57lrlfh69n5i32(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:49:53 -0500, Fred Hall <fkhall(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:04:28 -0400, Hachiroku ???? >>>>>>>>><Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>And? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to >>>>>>>>>>>>stop the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it >>>>>>>>>>>>was...delicious." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>A man of action. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >>>>>>>>>> >>>> Therein lies the problem. The "fuckers" will simply jack up pump >>>> prices and the innocent public becomes the "fuckers". Corporations >>>> rarely get hurt by fines and never pay taxes. The cost is simply >>>> passed on and we pay out of our pocket. >>>> >>>ALL COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ARE PAID BY THE END CONSUMER. A fact >>>liberals are incapable of learning. >>> >>So you're saying BP SHOULDN'T have to pay? Is that it? >> > No, he is saying that ultimately it will be B.P's customers who pay. > Please try to keep up. And thier stockholders. Apparently BP is heavily vested in the UK's retirement system. -- "Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure." �Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 1823
From: §ñühw¤£f on 24 Jun 2010 10:42 =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:04:33 -0400, Zombywoof wrote: > >> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:53:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:17 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antikerry(a)go.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote in message >>>>news:iQ7Un.228323$pj7.38157(a)en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com... >>>>> >>>>> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in > message >>>>> news:Xns9D9F7E14BAECFWereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >>>>>> Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>> news:40h126dna4msgl8pv657u58s7lad7afav7(a)4ax.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:26:03 -0400, "Lord Gow 333, not a White > House >>>>>>> approved poster!" <lordgow(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:v9bt161rv7phf2ko818p57lrlfh69n5i32(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:49:53 -0500, Fred Hall > <fkhall(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:04:28 -0400, Hachiroku ???? >>>>>>>>>><Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>And? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP > to >>>>>>>>>>>>>stop the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? > "it >>>>>>>>>>>>>was...delicious." >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>A man of action. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Therein lies the problem. The "fuckers" will simply jack up pump >>>>> prices and the innocent public becomes the "fuckers". > Corporations >>>>> rarely get hurt by fines and never pay taxes. The cost is simply >>>>> passed on and we pay out of our pocket. >>>>> >>>>ALL COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ARE PAID BY THE END CONSUMER. A fact >>>>liberals are incapable of learning. >>>> >>>So you're saying BP SHOULDN'T have to pay? Is that it? >>> >> No, he is saying that ultimately it will be B.P's customers who pay. >> Please try to keep up. > > It's like when the Progressives talk about putting outrageous taxes on > company's profits. > > Yeah. Sure the *companies* are going to pay them. > They do. And then the revenues can be used to conteract the negative effects the companies have on the enviroment, the standard of living, etc. This all *could* be averted *if* companies were socially responsible from the get-go. But, they arn't. Go fig. -- _____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____ / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\ _\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\ /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 24 Jun 2010 16:26 On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:42:12 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:04:33 -0400, Zombywoof wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:53:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:17 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antikerry(a)go.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>"RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:iQ7Un.228323$pj7.38157(a)en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >> message >>>>>> news:Xns9D9F7E14BAECFWereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >>>>>>> Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>> news:40h126dna4msgl8pv657u58s7lad7afav7(a)4ax.com: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:26:03 -0400, "Lord Gow 333, not a White >> House >>>>>>>> approved poster!" <lordgow(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:v9bt161rv7phf2ko818p57lrlfh69n5i32(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:49:53 -0500, Fred Hall >> <fkhall(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:04:28 -0400, Hachiroku ???? >>>>>>>>>>><Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>And? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP >> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? >> "it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>was...delicious." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>A man of action. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Therein lies the problem. The "fuckers" will simply jack up pump >>>>>> prices and the innocent public becomes the "fuckers". >> Corporations >>>>>> rarely get hurt by fines and never pay taxes. The cost is simply >>>>>> passed on and we pay out of our pocket. >>>>>> >>>>>ALL COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ARE PAID BY THE END CONSUMER. A fact >>>>>liberals are incapable of learning. >>>>> >>>>So you're saying BP SHOULDN'T have to pay? Is that it? >>>> >>> No, he is saying that ultimately it will be B.P's customers who pay. >>> Please try to keep up. >> >> It's like when the Progressives talk about putting outrageous taxes on >> company's profits. >> >> Yeah. Sure the *companies* are going to pay them. >> > They do. And then the revenues can be used to conteract the negative > effects the companies have on the enviroment, the standard of living, etc. > This all *could* be averted *if* companies were socially responsible from > the get-go. > But, they arn't. > Go fig. You're a dreamer, snuh... Some companies do try to be environmentally responsible. In some businesses, it's just too expensive. Then, they go to China. Anything goes there.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 24 Jun 2010 16:28
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:11:07 -0400, Deucalion wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:15:14 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:27:20 -0500, Jeff M wrote: >> >>> On 6/19/2010 6:22 PM, Winston_Smith wrote: >>>> edspyhill01<edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Jun 17, 6:38 am, Cliff wrote: >>>> >>>>> Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything >>>>> inconvenient? >>>> >>>> Notice how desperately the Bam Bam Boys try to divert attention from >>>> 0bama's many disasters. >>>> >>>> Here's "inconvenient" bunkie - >>>> >>>> The total farce is happening in the Gulf of Mexico. Bam Bam ignored >>>> it for six weeks, then he told us he was in micro-control of every >>>> single detail, and it's clear he doesn't have a clue what to do. >>> >>> What EXACTLY do you think Obama should do? Be specific. >> >>Something other than showing up, eating seafood (it was...delicious!) and >>calling in the lawyers would be nice. >> >>How about letting in the Dutch and the Norwegians, who offered help >>within three days and were told, "Thanks but no thanks" by the Obungler >>administration? That would have been good for a start. >> >>Or allowing the Cajuns to build barrier reefs like they offered? (Army >>Corps of Engineers said "We need to do an environmental impact study >>first." while the marshes are filling up with oil... >> >>Rahm Emanuel said something to the effect of never wasting a good crisis, >>and Obungler took it to heart. >> >>Moratorium on offshore drilling. Good job. Now he wants BP to pay the oil >>workers HE put out of work. >> >>This guy is a real piece of work, and is beginning to make Bush look like >>a genius... > > Well, with a little luck, you guys may be able to get the party of big > business back in power. Then we can apologize to the oil company for ever > expecting them to own the problem, pay for fixing it ourselves, and relax > drilling regulations a little more to pump up the ROI for investors. Uh...yeah...sure....<backs away from the newsgroup...> |