Total Farce
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Boxer Shorts
Next: Toyota drags down new-vehicle quality average; Ford leads Detroit 3 gains, J.D. Power says
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 21 Jun 2010 11:07 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:06:48 -0400, Cliff wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:05:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 08:37:36 -0400, Cliff wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:50:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>Franklin County, Mass. Another town (this makes three now) has voiced >>>>they do NOT want a wind farm in their community. >>> >>> How about some nice oil? >> >>What does that have to do with refusing windfarms, k00k? > > They have oil on the Gulf it seems. > >>You ever really say anything, or are you just another Empty Suit like the >>Pres? > > Found those "WMDs" yet? Yup. Empty Suit, with a matching head.
From: Jeff M on 21 Jun 2010 14:52 On 6/18/2010 1:47 AM, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Jun 17, 6:38 am, Cliff<Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > wrote: >> http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/06/yglesias... >> "O'Reilly Pwns Palin" >> >> <See video at link> >> >> [ >> ..... >> A moment of truth on the Factor: >> [ >> >> First, [O'Reilly] challenged Palin by saying, �49% of Americans still want BP to >> run the show and only 45% want the government to run the show.� >> >> If you stop the video at about the 3:00 point, you can see the look of dismay on >> Palin�s face, followed by nervousness, moments after he said that, as she must >> have realized this was not going to be the kind of cakewalk she has probably >> come to expect on Fox News. >> >> O�Reilly went on to ask, �What is your solution, here, Governor? What would you >> do tonight � tell the nation tonight, what you would have said, the main point >> in that speech. Go.� >> >> Palin obviously had no idea. �Stopping the gusher,� she said. �That�s the number >> one priority of the nation.� >> >> �But nobody knows how to do it,� O�Reilly countered. >> >> �Well, we haven�t had the assurance by the president that that has been his top >> priority.� Her voice rose with more condescension, as she continued to evade the >> question and, instead, went on to accuse the president of making �cap and tax� >> his greater priority and �using this crisis� to increase the cost of energy.� >> >> �Are you telling me that you don�t think the president�s top priority is >> stopping that leak? Is that what you�re telling me?� O�Reilly asked, not >> bothering to hide his incredulity. >> ] >> >> He clearly realizes what a total farce she is - and he slowly dismantles her >> mindless partisanship by the end of the segment. Good for O'Reilly. Particularly >> good for exposing just how little this phony knows about energy policy, her >> alleged expertise. >> ... >> ] > > Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything > inconvenient? The Right wing can be defined as the triumph of ideology over reality. They insist on believing lots of things that simply aren't true. They ignore inconvenient facts and cannot learn from their mistakes.
From: Jeff M on 21 Jun 2010 15:27 On 6/19/2010 6:22 PM, Winston_Smith wrote: > edspyhill01<edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 17, 6:38 am, Cliff wrote: > >> Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything >> inconvenient? > > Notice how desperately the Bam Bam Boys try to divert attention from > 0bama's many disasters. > > Here's "inconvenient" bunkie - > > The total farce is happening in the Gulf of Mexico. Bam Bam ignored > it for six weeks, then he told us he was in micro-control of every > single detail, and it's clear he doesn't have a clue what to do. What EXACTLY do you think Obama should do? Be specific. Most right-wingers secretly long for a Stalinist, authoritarian father figure to step in and wield dictatorial powers to "fix everything" for them, whenever they are scared or confused by any difficult, complex or vexing national problem. It's part of what makes rightards so dangerous in a democracy; they don't believe in democratic methods or solutions, not really. According to rightard mantra, all BP should need to fix the problem itself is less government regulation and lower taxes. Any resulting damages should then be handled by the affected state and local governments, since nothing in the Constitution authorizes a federal role in regional disasters. So why are all the rightards whining and crying about Obama? Is it because he won't be their daddy and wave his magic wand to instantly make it all better while tucking them in for the night?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 21 Jun 2010 15:29 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:52:14 -0500, Jeff M wrote: > On 6/18/2010 1:47 AM, edspyhill01 wrote: >> On Jun 17, 6:38 am, Cliff<Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> >> wrote: >>> http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/06/yglesias... >>> "O'Reilly Pwns Palin" >>> >>> <See video at link> >>> >>> [ >>> ..... >>> A moment of truth on the Factor: >>> [ >>> >>> First, [O'Reilly] challenged Palin by saying, “49% of Americans still >>> want BP to run the show and only 45% want the government to run the >>> show.” >>> >>> If you stop the video at about the 3:00 point, you can see the look of >>> dismay on Palin's face, followed by nervousness, moments after he >>> said that, as she must have realized this was not going to be the kind >>> of cakewalk she has probably come to expect on Fox News. >>> >>> O'Reilly went on to ask, “What is your solution, here, Governor? >>> What would you do tonight – tell the nation tonight, what you would >>> have said, the main point in that speech. Go.” >>> >>> Palin obviously had no idea. “Stopping the gusher,” she said. >>> “That's the number one priority of the nation.” >>> >>> “But nobody knows how to do it,” O'Reilly countered. >>> >>> “Well, we haven't had the assurance by the president that that has >>> been his top priority.” Her voice rose with more condescension, as >>> she continued to evade the question and, instead, went on to accuse the >>> president of making “cap and tax” his greater priority and “using >>> this crisis… to increase the cost of energy.” >>> >>> “Are you telling me that you don't think the president's top >>> priority is stopping that leak? Is that what you're telling me?” >>> O'Reilly asked, not bothering to hide his incredulity. >>> ] >>> >>> He clearly realizes what a total farce she is - and he slowly >>> dismantles her mindless partisanship by the end of the segment. Good >>> for O'Reilly. Particularly good for exposing just how little this phony >>> knows about energy policy, her alleged expertise. >>> ... >>> ] >> >> Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything >> inconvenient? > > The Right wing can be defined as the triumph of ideology over reality. > They insist on believing lots of things that simply aren't true. They > ignore inconvenient facts and cannot learn from their mistakes. ROFLMAO!!!!! I want what this guy's taking! If there is ANYONE who doesn't learn from mistakes, it's Democrats. Every time they get in office they try the same things over and over again; a Republican comes in and rights things, and then another Democrat comes in and screws it up. Tell me: why isn't Obungler going after Immigration Reform before November?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 21 Jun 2010 17:15
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:27:20 -0500, Jeff M wrote: > On 6/19/2010 6:22 PM, Winston_Smith wrote: >> edspyhill01<edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Jun 17, 6:38 am, Cliff wrote: >> >>> Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything >>> inconvenient? >> >> Notice how desperately the Bam Bam Boys try to divert attention from >> 0bama's many disasters. >> >> Here's "inconvenient" bunkie - >> >> The total farce is happening in the Gulf of Mexico. Bam Bam ignored it >> for six weeks, then he told us he was in micro-control of every single >> detail, and it's clear he doesn't have a clue what to do. > > What EXACTLY do you think Obama should do? Be specific. Something other than showing up, eating seafood (it was...delicious!) and calling in the lawyers would be nice. How about letting in the Dutch and the Norwegians, who offered help within three days and were told, "Thanks but no thanks" by the Obungler administration? That would have been good for a start. Or allowing the Cajuns to build barrier reefs like they offered? (Army Corps of Engineers said "We need to do an environmental impact study first." while the marshes are filling up with oil... Rahm Emanuel said something to the effect of never wasting a good crisis, and Obungler took it to heart. Moratorium on offshore drilling. Good job. Now he wants BP to pay the oil workers HE put out of work. This guy is a real piece of work, and is beginning to make Bush look like a genius... > > Most right-wingers secretly long for a Stalinist, authoritarian father > figure to step in and wield dictatorial powers to "fix everything" for > them, whenever they are scared or confused by any difficult, complex or > vexing national problem. It's part of what makes rightards so dangerous > in a democracy; they don't believe in democratic methods or solutions, not > really. > > According to rightard mantra, all BP should need to fix the problem itself > is less government regulation and lower taxes. Any resulting damages > should then be handled by the affected state and local governments, since > nothing in the Constitution authorizes a federal role in regional > disasters. So why are all the rightards whining and crying about Obama? > Is it because he won't be their daddy and wave his magic wand to instantly > make it all better while tucking them in for the night? |