Total Farce
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Boxer Shorts
Next: Toyota drags down new-vehicle quality average; Ford leads Detroit 3 gains, J.D. Power says
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 20 Jun 2010 01:45 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:38:16 -0400, Cliff wrote: > He clearly realizes what a total farce she is - and he slowly dismantles > her mindless partisanship by the end of the segment. Good for O'Reilly. > Particularly good for exposing just how little this phony knows about > energy policy, her alleged expertise. And? She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to stop the mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it was...delicious." A man of action.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 20 Jun 2010 01:47 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:47:48 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Jun 17, 6:38 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > wrote: >> http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/06/yglesias... >> "O'Reilly Pwns Palin" >> >> <See video at link> >> >> [ >> ..... >> A moment of truth on the Factor: >> [ >> >> First, [O'Reilly] challenged Palin by saying, “49% of Americans still >> want BP to run the show and only 45% want the government to run the >> show.” >> >> If you stop the video at about the 3:00 point, you can see the look of >> dismay on Palin's face, followed by nervousness, moments after he said >> that, as she must have realized this was not going to be the kind of >> cakewalk she has probably come to expect on Fox News. >> >> O'Reilly went on to ask, “What is your solution, here, Governor? >> What would you do tonight – tell the nation tonight, what you would >> have said, the main point in that speech. Go.” >> >> Palin obviously had no idea. “Stopping the gusher,” she said. >> “That's the number one priority of the nation.” >> >> “But nobody knows how to do it,” O'Reilly countered. >> >> “Well, we haven't had the assurance by the president that that has >> been his top priority.” Her voice rose with more condescension, as she >> continued to evade the question and, instead, went on to accuse the >> president of making “cap and tax” his greater priority and “using >> this crisis… to increase the cost of energy.” >> >> “Are you telling me that you don't think the president's top >> priority is stopping that leak? Is that what you're telling me?” >> O'Reilly asked, not bothering to hide his incredulity. >> ] >> >> He clearly realizes what a total farce she is - and he slowly dismantles >> her mindless partisanship by the end of the segment. Good for O'Reilly. >> Particularly good for exposing just how little this phony knows about >> energy policy, her alleged expertise. >> ... >> ] > > Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything inconvenient? HAHAHAHAHA! Obungler's been doing his level best to distance himself from real action, and you're still picking on Palin, who, really is a nobody right now?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 20 Jun 2010 01:50 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:30:44 -0400, Cliff wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:23:46 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>Obama, Goldman Sachs, SEIU, ACORN, and a host of other Big Names are all >>behind Cap & Trade because they stand to take billions of dollars out of >>your pocket. > > A carbon tax might be better. > Wingers can count it, right? See Obungler's speech the other night? He wants to know if someone is standing in the way of alternative power sources. Franklin County, Mass. Another town (this makes three now) has voiced they do NOT want a wind farm in their community. Liberal k00ks. They get on the twon common every weekend with signs demanding alternative energy, and when it's presented to them, "NIMBY". I call them COVEs:Citizens Opposed to Virtually Everything.
From: Cliff on 20 Jun 2010 08:37 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:50:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >Franklin County, Mass. Another town (this makes three now) has voiced they >do NOT want a wind farm in their community. How about some nice oil? -- Cliff
From: Cliff on 20 Jun 2010 08:42
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:22:57 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real(a)bogus.net> wrote: >edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>On Jun 17, 6:38�am, Cliff wrote: > >>Notice how consistantly the rightwingnuts ignore everything >>inconvenient? > >Notice how desperately the Bam Bam Boys try to divert attention from >0bama's many disasters. > >Here's "inconvenient" bunkie - > >The total farce is happening in the Gulf of Mexico. Bam Bam ignored >it for six weeks, then he told us he was in micro-control of every >single detail, and it's clear he doesn't have a clue what to do. BP does, right? Or the rethugs wanting the government to pay for all of it .... out of yet more debt & spending, right? >Total farce is the accelerating collapse of Bam Bam's economy. All he >can think of is to borrow and spend massively more but his credit card >was canceled by reality. IMHO it's bestter to clean thing up *after* you stop adding to the messes. Cheaper too. From the shore you cannot see the skimmers or the big oil patches. >Total farce is Bam Bam's fast failing bloody war in Afghanistan. The bushco & rethug wars. -- Cliff |