Total Farce
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Boxer Shorts
Next: Toyota drags down new-vehicle quality average; Ford leads Detroit 3 gains, J.D. Power says
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 20 Jun 2010 12:04 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >>And? >> >>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to stop the >>mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it was...delicious." >> >>A man of action. >> >> >> > He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? Oh boy. He called out the lawyers. The Army Corps of Engineers dragged their heels on the state's requests to build barrier reefs because they needed to do an "Environmental Impact Study" (HUH? Concrete is worse than OIL?!?!?! "We" turned away offers for help from countries that had the technology to clean up about 75% of the oil very early on. Because of a ~1920 law provided to protect unions. > > Poor Hachoo, blinded by the light Better than being baffled by the BULLSHIT.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 20 Jun 2010 12:05 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 08:37:36 -0400, Cliff wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:50:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>Franklin County, Mass. Another town (this makes three now) has voiced >>they do NOT want a wind farm in their community. > > How about some nice oil? What does that have to do with refusing windfarms, k00k? You ever really say anything, or are you just another Empty Suit like the Pres?
From: Bill Noble on 20 Jun 2010 12:36 "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message news:9t2s16hnskr2oq1cii9osbuk6tb5c8ccip(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:22:57 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real(a)bogus.net> > wrote: > > IMHO it's bestter to clean thing up *after* you stop adding to the > messes. > Cheaper too. > > From the shore you cannot see the skimmers or the big oil patches. > if you guys who spend hours screaming at each other would spend just 1 minute per day not wasting energy, you would contribute to a solution. If you spent another minute per day looking at how you could do things better, you would be actively engaged in a patriotic activity. If you (and most of you are knowledgeable and intelligent) were to teach neighbors and friends how to use less oil, to be more efficient in electrical power usage, to conserve, this would escalate and we might have a nation again. But if you just sit here (or there) and scream at each other and try to undermine political dialog, you are in fact traitors to the founding principles of this nation. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate. Which are you?
From: Bill Noble on 20 Jun 2010 12:40 see this: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6623#comment-655353
From: Lookout on 20 Jun 2010 20:07
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:49:53 -0500, Fred Hall <fkhall(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:04:28 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:08:59 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: >> >>>>And? >>>> >>>>She's NOT the President. OK, so a lot of Americans want BP to stop the >>>>mess, but what has Obungler done? Eaten seafood? "it was...delicious." >>>> >>>>A man of action. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> He got the fuckers to pony up several billion dollars, eh? >> >>Oh boy. He called out the lawyers. >> >>The Army Corps of Engineers dragged their heels on the state's requests to >>build barrier reefs because they needed to do an "Environmental Impact >>Study" (HUH? Concrete is worse than OIL?!?!?! >> >>"We" turned away offers for help from countries that had the technology to >>clean up about 75% of the oil very early on. Because of a ~1920 law >>provided to protect unions. Cite? Until I see proof it's not true. |