Hachoo The Stupid
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Keeping my insurance rates low.. Thank you taxpayers..?
Next: please help me! i have a huge problem!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 15 Jun 2010 22:01 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:11:29 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:41 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku > ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:37:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:07:01 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:43:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:42:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for >>>>> writing: >>>>> >>>>> <The dawning of the confused Hachoo> >>>>>>>>><YAWN> Try to keep to one topic at a time, Nitwit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, you are quite too stupid to attempt more than one at a time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're the one getting confused here, Chowderhead. >>>>>> >>>>>>Really, so what part of 8B, 80B, and 1.1T don't I get. It is all in >>>>>>the report. Right where I got them. You did read the report that we >>>>>>are discussingf? You wouldn't want to look like a complete idiot >>>>>>whining about facts you should have known? >>>>>> >>>>>>Since I understand the interaction of that set of dollar figures and >>>>>>you don't and you can't seem to grasp the words "a year" then how do >>>>>>you think the confusion would be working against me? >>>>>> >>>>>>Do you understand those numbers and are you going to explain what you >>>>>>think they mean? >>>>>> >>>>>>I say they mean essentially the same thing and are just differing >>>>>>represetative values. Do you agree or disagree? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> And there is where he started getting confused. Unable to keep more >>>>> than one thought, he started whining. >>>> >>>>Narrating for your audience? I guess you think they are too stupid to >>>>figure it out. >>> >>> Oh, they igured it out, I just like rubbing it in, just for you. >> >>I don't care. > > "<STOMP> SO THERE!" > *snicker* > >>Do you carry your ego in a separate backpack, or does it just walk >>alongside you? > > Actually, I use a front end loader and a dump. Much more efficient, > > However, that from someone that so obviously suffers from Narcissistic > Personality Disorder has a fine irony that was quite enjoyable. > > >> >>> >>>>Must be, if they're reading any of this tripe. >>>> >>>> >>> Well, you should not be so hard on yourself, that was tripe but it was >>> some of your better tripe. >> >>Um, I wasn't talking about my postings, Chowderhead. > > Then why did you use "this" if you meant "that". You see, my reading > always makes sense so when you write something that is obviously temporaly > attached to your post I have to assume that is what you meant. > > >> >>> Now, what do you want to bet you can't figure that one out. >> >> >>You're the one that has the problem with Double Entendre, remember? > > That wasn't a double entendre, you retard. For it to be a double entendre > then the first meaning is the straight forward meaning and the more subtle > ironic or risque is the secondary. > > So for it to be a double entendre you flamed yourself and your ironic > meaning was you didn't mean to flame yourself. > > Try to use terms and phrases for which you actually understand the meaning > and usage. Sure thing, Chowderhead.
From: pandora on 15 Jun 2010 23:09 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:56:16 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:06:56 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:21:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:35:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing >>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reduce >>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type >>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >>>>>>>> wanted to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >>>>>>>> themselves and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once >>>>>>>> prosperous Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that >>>>>>>> he couldnt deliver on it was less important than his ability to >>>>>>>> play to their beliefs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always >>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> See answer above. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the >>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>> >>>> >>>>I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan freeing >>>>up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>> >>> So you are in accord with California republicans. >>> >>> Of which 25% are so completely insane they voted for Orly Taitz. >>> >>> Yep, some party you got there. >> >> It seems that he, like so many of their ilk, are only interested in >> making money. > > > And the problem with that is....? > > I am for *anybody* making money. That's what's so great about > Capitalism. > > "reditributing wealth" brings everyone to the same level of poverty. > Unless you're a monied Democrat, of course. That's a very negative attitude but one I'm not surprised that you have.
From: pandora on 15 Jun 2010 23:11 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:59:13 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things >>>>>> in his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, >>>>>> why should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard >>>>>> someone else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what >>>>>> they meant." >>>>> >>>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think >>>> and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from >>>> other sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat >>>> these things. >>> >>> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >>> answer is, "I didn't say that." >> >> >> >> Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more >> information about them. And you ARE afraid. > > > And you're as dumb as Aratzio... No, you're afraid.
From: pandora on 15 Jun 2010 23:12 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:00:06 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:20 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:03:03 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>Adults can see the facts without the idealogical goggles. Wingnuts >>>>>and other exteremists on either side are left frothing like you do at >>>>>the drop of his name. >>> >>> So, you liked the goggles thing. Cool. I expect you'll be using it a >>> lot now. >>> >>> >>>>>Watch: Obama >>>>> >>>>>How did that make you feel when you saw his name? >>> >>> That your an idiot? >> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>>> *SPNAK* >>> >>> Sure. You can't even spell it right. >> -------------------------------------- >> >> Hilarious! > > > Let me know when you and dipshit start acting your ages and not like > overgrown Kollege Kids, 'K? Let me know when you stop whining. m'kay?
From: Aratzio on 15 Jun 2010 23:37
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:20 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:03:03 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>Adults can see the facts without the idealogical goggles. Wingnuts and >>>>other exteremists on either side are left frothing like you do at the >>>>drop of his name. >> >> So, you liked the goggles thing. Cool. I expect you'll be using it a lot >> now. >> >> >>>>Watch: Obama >>>> >>>>How did that make you feel when you saw his name? >> >> That your an idiot? >------------------------------ >> >>>> >>> *SPNAK* >> >> Sure. You can't even spell it right. >-------------------------------------- > >Hilarious! > Once he found out how stupid he was, he didn't care anymore. The usual for him. He can't handle being wrong. |