Hachoo The Stupid
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Keeping my insurance rates low.. Thank you taxpayers..?
Next: please help me! i have a huge problem!
From: Aratzio on 16 Jun 2010 00:34 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:13:44 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:44:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:01:22 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku >> ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:11:29 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:41 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>>> writing: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:37:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:07:01 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>>>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>>>>> writing: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:43:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:42:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for >>>>>>>> writing: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <The dawning of the confused Hachoo> >>>>>>>>>>>><YAWN> Try to keep to one topic at a time, Nitwit. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, you are quite too stupid to attempt more than one at a >>>>>>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You're the one getting confused here, Chowderhead. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Really, so what part of 8B, 80B, and 1.1T don't I get. It is all in >>>>>>>>>the report. Right where I got them. You did read the report that we >>>>>>>>>are discussingf? You wouldn't want to look like a complete idiot >>>>>>>>>whining about facts you should have known? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Since I understand the interaction of that set of dollar figures >>>>>>>>>and you don't and you can't seem to grasp the words "a year" then >>>>>>>>>how do you think the confusion would be working against me? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Do you understand those numbers and are you going to explain what >>>>>>>>>you think they mean? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I say they mean essentially the same thing and are just differing >>>>>>>>>represetative values. Do you agree or disagree? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And there is where he started getting confused. Unable to keep more >>>>>>>> than one thought, he started whining. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Narrating for your audience? I guess you think they are too stupid to >>>>>>>figure it out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, they igured it out, I just like rubbing it in, just for you. >>>>> >>>>>I don't care. >>>> >>>> "<STOMP> SO THERE!" >>>> *snicker* >>>> >>>>>Do you carry your ego in a separate backpack, or does it just walk >>>>>alongside you? >>>> >>>> Actually, I use a front end loader and a dump. Much more efficient, >>>> >>>> However, that from someone that so obviously suffers from Narcissistic >>>> Personality Disorder has a fine irony that was quite enjoyable. >> >> What, the NPD kept you from reading and responding, right? >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>Must be, if they're reading any of this tripe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Well, you should not be so hard on yourself, that was tripe but it >>>>>> was some of your better tripe. >>>>> >>>>>Um, I wasn't talking about my postings, Chowderhead. >>>> >>>> Then why did you use "this" if you meant "that". You see, my reading >>>> always makes sense so when you write something that is obviously >>>> temporaly attached to your post I have to assume that is what you >>>> meant. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Now, what do you want to bet you can't figure that one out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You're the one that has the problem with Double Entendre, remember? >>>> >>>> That wasn't a double entendre, you retard. For it to be a double >>>> entendre then the first meaning is the straight forward meaning and the >>>> more subtle ironic or risque is the secondary. >>>> >>>> So for it to be a double entendre you flamed yourself and your ironic >>>> meaning was you didn't mean to flame yourself. >>>> >>>> Try to use terms and phrases for which you actually understand the >>>> meaning and usage. >>> >>>Sure thing, Chowderhead. >>> >>> >> Wow, scathing, you post the stupid, you get spanked and all you can do is >> try to act like it didn't matter. >> >> So, do you understand the difference between "this" and "that" now? > >Coming from you, I just consider the source. > Ah, so you don't care anmore, being wrong always seems to do that to you.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:53 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:28:04 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>> Well, it is more the keeping poor people fom being anything other than >>> poor. That way they have someone to look down upon. >> >> >>How about more like giving people a chance to not be poor? > > Like equity in education? What's wrong with education? It costs about $20,000 per student for a public education. A few thousand more and they could go to private schools. So what do you do with kids that don't *want* to learn? Put them on Welfare? > >>All on their own. There are plenty of programs available to help people >>better themselves; education, training, daycare, etc. > > But you are against redistribution. The programs are alredy in place. Use them if you have to. > > >>People like YOU like to keep the poor, poor. > > Really? By allowing them the opportunity to the same level of education > regardless of their economic status? How am I stopping that? The government already spends plenty of money on education. So, if the system isn't working, throw *more* money at it? > > How about we cut the DoD budget by 1/2 and spend the savings on Education? Why? Plenty is being spent already.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:53 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:28:53 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:07:29 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku > ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:10 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:58:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:03:30 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>> >>>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:40:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:2VzRn.14001$3y2.8187(a)newsfe11.iad... >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and >>>>>> closing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big >>>>>> deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf >>>>>> Reduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>> Type >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >>>>>> wanted >>>>>>>>>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >>>>>> themselves >>>>>>>>>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous >>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he >>>>>> couldnt >>>>>>>>>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to >>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I >>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> See answer above. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan >>>>>> freeing >>>>>>>>> up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do YOU think he "freed up business to do business"? You said >>>>>> it, so >>>>>>>> you should be able to support the comment with a one or two >>>>>> sentence >>>>>>>> explanation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good luck with that! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Really. I don't supply idiots with answers. >>>>>> >>>>> Translation: I havent got any credible CITES for my bumper-sticker >>>>> based ideology. >>>>> >>>>> Its hard to defend a slogan, innit? >>>>> >>>>> ^_^ >>>> >>>> >>>>I don't have any 'cites' because it's kind of hard citing yourself. I >>>>form my own opinions, mostly based upon what people themselves say. I >>>>have satellite TV and satellite radio, and can hear people speking for >>>>themselves. THen I form my own opinions. >>>> >>>>Sorry if I can't give you a link to Limbaugh or Beck. >>>> >>>> >>> Which all explains why he does not have defensible positions. He lies. >> >> >>Bullshit. > > Bullshit is the same as lies. And you're the biggest bullshitter here.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:54 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:30:52 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:08:14 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku > ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:41:04 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:59:13 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>> news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things >>>>>>>>> in his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't >>>>>>>>> know, why should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I >>>>>>>>> heard someone else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no >>>>>>>>> clue what they meant." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to >>>>>>> think and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard >>>>>>> from other sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you >>>>>>> repeat these things. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >>>>>> answer is, "I didn't say that." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more >>>>> information about them. And you ARE afraid. >>>> >>>> >>>>And you're as dumb as Aratzio... >>>> >>>> >>> In Hachoo world having knowledge, opinions and the guts to stand up for >>> your opinions is *dumb*. >> >>BWAHAHAHA! You and JSB, 'knowledge' and 'guts'??? >> >>BWAHAHAHA! > > So, which opinion of yours are you willing to stand an support. All of them. How do you 'cite' an opinion? Yeah. Complete morons, both of you. Go watch Olbermann. He'll tell you what to 'think'. > > You can't. > > You lose.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:56
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:34:09 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:12:33 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku > ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:42:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:00:06 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:20 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:03:03 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Adults can see the facts without the idealogical goggles. Wingnuts >>>>>>>>and other exteremists on either side are left frothing like you do >>>>>>>>at the drop of his name. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, you liked the goggles thing. Cool. I expect you'll be using it a >>>>>> lot now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Watch: Obama >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How did that make you feel when you saw his name? >>>>>> >>>>>> That your an idiot? >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> *SPNAK* >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. You can't even spell it right. >>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Hilarious! >>>> >>>> >>>>Let me know when you and dipshit start acting your ages and not like >>>>overgrown Kollege Kids, 'K? >>>> >>>> >>> And it was soooo important that you point out what you saw as a >>> spelling error and when you discovered all the *cool kids* knew >>> something you didn't it was any fun for you anymore. Especially when >>> the cool kids all laughed at you, as usual. >> >>You are kidding, right? Fool. >> >> > Wow, you actually caught I was making fun of your whiney grade school > attitude. > > I for one am shocked you have that level of perception that you could > decipher such an obvious thing. > > Congratulations you may be smarter than a grozny. Thanks. Maybe. But you're still an overgrown 6th grader. |