Hachoo The Stupid
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Keeping my insurance rates low.. Thank you taxpayers..?
Next: please help me! i have a huge problem!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Jun 2010 22:05 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:49:51 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:42:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, Aratzio > <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing: > >>HEEE HEEE Heee HEHEHE >>8 Billion >>80 Billion >>1.1 Trillion >>all in a link >>you failed to read it >> >>Yes, I knew you would and I did the 1.1 Trillion thing to make you froth >>about 8B & 80B. >> >>BWAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA >> >>Yeah, keep telling yourself how smart you are. >> >>How long have I been telling you to read the link and you were just too >>stupid to figure any of it out. > > I hate when I snitch myself off and give away the gaff, it always makes > them pout and run away. And the girls all say, "Oh, YES, Aratzio! You're just SOOO great!"
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Jun 2010 22:07 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:43:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:42:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, Aratzio > <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing: > > <The dawning of the confused Hachoo> >>>>><YAWN> Try to keep to one topic at a time, Nitwit. >>>> >>>> Yeah, you are quite too stupid to attempt more than one at a time. >>> >>>You're the one getting confused here, Chowderhead. >> >>Really, so what part of 8B, 80B, and 1.1T don't I get. It is all in the >>report. Right where I got them. You did read the report that we are >>discussingf? You wouldn't want to look like a complete idiot whining >>about facts you should have known? >> >>Since I understand the interaction of that set of dollar figures and you >>don't and you can't seem to grasp the words "a year" then how do you >>think the confusion would be working against me? >> >>Do you understand those numbers and are you going to explain what you >>think they mean? >> >>I say they mean essentially the same thing and are just differing >>represetative values. Do you agree or disagree? >> >> > And there is where he started getting confused. Unable to keep more than > one thought, he started whining. Narrating for your audience? I guess you think they are too stupid to figure it out. Must be, if they're reading any of this tripe.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Jun 2010 22:09 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things in >>> his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, why >>> should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard someone >>> else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what they meant." >> >> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >> >> > > When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think and > speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from other > sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat these things. I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard answer is, "I didn't say that."
From: Aratzio on 14 Jun 2010 22:21 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:35:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, ���hw��f wrote: >>>> >>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, ���hw��f wrote: >>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing >>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf Reduce >>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type the >>>>>>>> name. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>> >>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they wanted to >>>>> hear. People will do any number of things to delude themselves and >>>>> Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous Uhmurikuh and >>>>> the sheeple went for it. The fact that he couldnt deliver on it was >>>>> less important than his ability to play to their beliefs. >>>> >>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always >>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>> >>>>> Word. >>> >>> >>> See answer above. >> >> >> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the >> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. > > >I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan freeing up >business to do business had a lot to do with it. So you are in accord with California republicans. Of which 25% are so completely insane they voted for Orly Taitz. Yep, some party you got there.
From: Aratzio on 14 Jun 2010 22:22
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:35:31 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:04:36 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:21:33 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku >> ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:31:11 -0400, ah wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/12/2010 3:18 PM, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>> >>>>> They're the wrong facts, but I suppose you need anything to make you >>>>> feel justified. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing foreign >>>>>> bases >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf Reduce troops in >>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>> >>>>> Who said it was about saving money, dipshit? I never mentioned >>>>> *anything* about money. And with the current President, what does >>>>> saving money have to do with anything? >>>>> >>>>> God, any discussion with you where you actually have to *think* is >>>>> totally useless, isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> Now, go back to the original thread, put the crack pipe down, and try >>>>> to actually think about *why* I said closing the bases was a bad idea. >>>> >>>> I don't know where you live, but how kindly would you be to having >>>> Chinese military bases in, say, Rhode Island? >>>> >>>> Why /is/ the closure of exo-America bases a bad idea? >>> >>> >>>I'd tell you, but I like watching Ratzoo chase his tail... >> >> Stupid is your life. > >Arf arf. Sit up and beg. > He felt Human stupid provided too many options for him. |