Hachoo The Stupid
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Keeping my insurance rates low.. Thank you taxpayers..?
Next: please help me! i have a huge problem!
From: Aratzio on 16 Jun 2010 00:28 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:07:29 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:10 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:58:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku >> ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:03:30 -0600, ���hw��f wrote: >>> >>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:40:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:2VzRn.14001$3y2.8187(a)newsfe11.iad... >>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, ���hw�f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, ���hw�f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and >>>>> closing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big >>>>> deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf >>>>> Reduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>> Type >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >>>>> wanted >>>>>>>>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >>>>> themselves >>>>>>>>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous >>>>>>>>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he >>>>> couldnt >>>>>>>>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to >>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I >>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> See answer above. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and >>>>> the >>>>>>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan >>>>> freeing >>>>>>>> up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do YOU think he "freed up business to do business"? You said >>>>> it, so >>>>>>> you should be able to support the comment with a one or two >>>>> sentence >>>>>>> explanation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Good luck with that! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Really. I don't supply idiots with answers. >>>>> >>>> Translation: I havent got any credible CITES for my bumper-sticker >>>> based ideology. >>>> >>>> Its hard to defend a slogan, innit? >>>> >>>> ^_^ >>> >>> >>>I don't have any 'cites' because it's kind of hard citing yourself. I >>>form my own opinions, mostly based upon what people themselves say. I >>>have satellite TV and satellite radio, and can hear people speking for >>>themselves. THen I form my own opinions. >>> >>>Sorry if I can't give you a link to Limbaugh or Beck. >>> >>> >> Which all explains why he does not have defensible positions. He lies. > > >Bullshit. Bullshit is the same as lies.
From: Aratzio on 16 Jun 2010 00:30 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:08:14 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:41:04 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:59:13 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku >> ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>> news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things >>>>>>>> in his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, >>>>>>>> why should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard >>>>>>>> someone else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what >>>>>>>> they meant." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think >>>>>> and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from >>>>>> other sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat >>>>>> these things. >>>>> >>>>> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >>>>> answer is, "I didn't say that." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more >>>> information about them. And you ARE afraid. >>> >>> >>>And you're as dumb as Aratzio... >>> >>> >> In Hachoo world having knowledge, opinions and the guts to stand up for >> your opinions is *dumb*. > >BWAHAHAHA! You and JSB, 'knowledge' and 'guts'??? > >BWAHAHAHA! So, which opinion of yours are you willing to stand an support. You can't. You lose.
From: Aratzio on 16 Jun 2010 00:31 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:09:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:11:28 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:59:13 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>> news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things >>>>>>>> in his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, >>>>>>>> why should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard >>>>>>>> someone else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what >>>>>>>> they meant." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think >>>>>> and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from >>>>>> other sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat >>>>>> these things. >>>>> >>>>> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >>>>> answer is, "I didn't say that." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more >>>> information about them. And you ARE afraid. >>> >>> >>> And you're as dumb as Aratzio... >> >> No, you're afraid. > >BWAHAHAHA! Wrong, as usual. > >My opinions don't fit the Politically Correct 'model', so they aren't >valid? > >How awfully narrow-minded of you! You are lying.
From: Aratzio on 16 Jun 2010 00:32 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:11:56 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:37:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:20 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, pandora >> <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:03:03 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Adults can see the facts without the idealogical goggles. Wingnuts and >>>>>>other exteremists on either side are left frothing like you do at the >>>>>>drop of his name. >>>> >>>> So, you liked the goggles thing. Cool. I expect you'll be using it a >>>> lot now. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>Watch: Obama >>>>>> >>>>>>How did that make you feel when you saw his name? >>>> >>>> That your an idiot? >>>------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>>> *SPNAK* >>>> >>>> Sure. You can't even spell it right. >>>-------------------------------------- >>> >>>Hilarious! >>> >> Once he found out how stupid he was, he didn't care anymore. >> >> The usual for him. He can't handle being wrong. > >Oh, no. I'm right. It's spelled "spank" > >You're just an overgrown juvenile who wants to be 'kewl!' >Figured I'd spell it that way to appear "hip": > > kewl 1067 up, 689 down > >The stupidest possible mispelling of a word in existance. Not only is it >wrong, but it is also harder to type than "cool". > > Poor baby, vernacular still causes you histrionics. Suddenly you care again. Funny how you being wrong, as usual, made you suddenly care again.
From: Aratzio on 16 Jun 2010 00:34
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:12:33 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:42:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:00:06 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku >> ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:20 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:03:03 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>Adults can see the facts without the idealogical goggles. Wingnuts >>>>>>>and other exteremists on either side are left frothing like you do at >>>>>>>the drop of his name. >>>>> >>>>> So, you liked the goggles thing. Cool. I expect you'll be using it a >>>>> lot now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>Watch: Obama >>>>>>> >>>>>>>How did that make you feel when you saw his name? >>>>> >>>>> That your an idiot? >>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> *SPNAK* >>>>> >>>>> Sure. You can't even spell it right. >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Hilarious! >>> >>> >>>Let me know when you and dipshit start acting your ages and not like >>>overgrown Kollege Kids, 'K? >>> >>> >> And it was soooo important that you point out what you saw as a spelling >> error and when you discovered all the *cool kids* knew something you >> didn't it was any fun for you anymore. Especially when the cool kids all >> laughed at you, as usual. > >You are kidding, right? Fool. > Wow, you actually caught I was making fun of your whiney grade school attitude. I for one am shocked you have that level of perception that you could decipher such an obvious thing. Congratulations you may be smarter than a grozny. |