From: Aratzio on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:36:32 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:07:25 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:23:35 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>> "CharlesGrozny" <n5hsr(a)hotmail.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>aRATzero kicked your butt
>>
>> See, even that grozny thing thinks so.
>
>Speaking of

You getting your butt kicked.
From: Aratzio on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:05:47 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:49:51 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:42:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, Aratzio
>> <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>HEEE HEEE Heee HEHEHE
>>>8 Billion
>>>80 Billion
>>>1.1 Trillion
>>>all in a link
>>>you failed to read it
>>>
>>>Yes, I knew you would and I did the 1.1 Trillion thing to make you froth
>>>about 8B & 80B.
>>>
>>>BWAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
>>>
>>>Yeah, keep telling yourself how smart you are.
>>>
>>>How long have I been telling you to read the link and you were just too
>>>stupid to figure any of it out.
>>
>> I hate when I snitch myself off and give away the gaff, it always makes
>> them pout and run away.
>
>And the girls all say, "Oh, YES, Aratzio! You're just SOOO great!"
>

" I ams what I ams and that's all that I ams"

Unlike some people who whine when there is more than one subject under
discussion in the same post. That must be so difficult when you are
out in public.

From: Aratzio on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:07:01 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:43:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:42:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, Aratzio
>> <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>> <The dawning of the confused Hachoo>
>>>>>><YAWN> Try to keep to one topic at a time, Nitwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, you are quite too stupid to attempt more than one at a time.
>>>>
>>>>You're the one getting confused here, Chowderhead.
>>>
>>>Really, so what part of 8B, 80B, and 1.1T don't I get. It is all in the
>>>report. Right where I got them. You did read the report that we are
>>>discussingf? You wouldn't want to look like a complete idiot whining
>>>about facts you should have known?
>>>
>>>Since I understand the interaction of that set of dollar figures and you
>>>don't and you can't seem to grasp the words "a year" then how do you
>>>think the confusion would be working against me?
>>>
>>>Do you understand those numbers and are you going to explain what you
>>>think they mean?
>>>
>>>I say they mean essentially the same thing and are just differing
>>>represetative values. Do you agree or disagree?
>>>
>>>
>> And there is where he started getting confused. Unable to keep more than
>> one thought, he started whining.
>
>Narrating for your audience? I guess you think they are too stupid to
>figure it out.

Oh, they igured it out, I just like rubbing it in, just for you.

>
>Must be, if they're reading any of this tripe.
>

Well, you should not be so hard on yourself, that was tripe but it was
some of your better tripe.

Now, what do you want to bet you can't figure that one out.
From: pandora on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:28:23 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "pandora" <pandora(a)peak.org> wrote in message
> news:UMmdnQlYraoRSIvRnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com...
>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad...
>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw?£f wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw?£f wrote:
>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing
>>>>>>>>> foreign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf Reduce
>>>>>>>>> troops in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type
>>>>>>>>> the name.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Word.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they wanted
>>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude themselves
>>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous
>>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he couldnt
>>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to their
>>>>>> beliefs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far
>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always
>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Word.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See answer above.
>>>
>>>
>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the
>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water.
>>
>> Well, in truth, Nancy was our president then.
>
>
> Reagan's ghost still gives pleasure to people who think American was
> like this before some vague point in history:
>
> http://www.best-norman-rockwell-art.com/images/1919-02-22-Saturday-
Evening-Post-Norman-Rockwell-cover-World-War-I-Soldier-Marching-with-
Children-no-logo-400-Digimar.jpg
>
> In reality, no such world ever existed.

Indeed. It IS just what it is, warts and all.
And there never was a *golden* time.
From: Aratzio on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:09:58 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things in
>>>> his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, why
>>>> should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard someone
>>>> else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what they meant."
>>>
>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think and
>> speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from other
>> sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat these things.
>
>I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard answer
>is, "I didn't say that."
>
>

So that is from whom you stole your standard line #4.