Hachoo The Stupid
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Keeping my insurance rates low.. Thank you taxpayers..?
Next: please help me! i have a huge problem!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:05 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:38:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:06:56 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, pandora > <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:21:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:35:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing >>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf Reduce >>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type >>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >>>>>>>> wanted to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >>>>>>>> themselves and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once >>>>>>>> prosperous Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he >>>>>>>> couldnt deliver on it was less important than his ability to play >>>>>>>> to their beliefs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always >>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> See answer above. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the >>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>> >>>> >>>>I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan freeing >>>>up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>> >>> So you are in accord with California republicans. >>> >>> Of which 25% are so completely insane they voted for Orly Taitz. >>> >>> Yep, some party you got there. >> >>It seems that he, like so many of their ilk, are only interested in >>making money. > > Well, it is more the keeping poor people fom being anything other than > poor. That way they have someone to look down upon. How about more like giving people a chance to not be poor? All on their own. There are plenty of programs available to help people better themselves; education, training, daycare, etc. People like YOU like to keep the poor, poor.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:06 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:09:43 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:56:16 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:06:56 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:21:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:35:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>>> writing: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing >>>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reduce >>>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type >>>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >>>>>>>>> wanted to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >>>>>>>>> themselves and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once >>>>>>>>> prosperous Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that >>>>>>>>> he couldnt deliver on it was less important than his ability to >>>>>>>>> play to their beliefs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always >>>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See answer above. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the >>>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan freeing >>>>>up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>>> >>>> So you are in accord with California republicans. >>>> >>>> Of which 25% are so completely insane they voted for Orly Taitz. >>>> >>>> Yep, some party you got there. >>> >>> It seems that he, like so many of their ilk, are only interested in >>> making money. >> >> >> And the problem with that is....? >> >> I am for *anybody* making money. That's what's so great about >> Capitalism. >> >> "reditributing wealth" brings everyone to the same level of poverty. >> Unless you're a monied Democrat, of course. > > That's a very negative attitude but one I'm not surprised that you have. How do you figure that's negative?!?!? <rolls eyes>! Letting people pull themselves UP is negative?!?! Putting people on Welfare and letting them STAY poor appears to be a more negative attituded to me. You two are certainly a pair that can beat a full house. Whew!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:07 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:10 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:58:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku > ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:03:30 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >> >>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:40:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>> news:2VzRn.14001$3y2.8187(a)newsfe11.iad... >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and >>>> closing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big >>>> deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf >>>> Reduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>> Type >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >>>> wanted >>>>>>>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >>>> themselves >>>>>>>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous >>>>>>>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he >>>> couldnt >>>>>>>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to >>>> their >>>>>>>>>>> beliefs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I >>>> always >>>>>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> See answer above. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and >>>> the >>>>>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan >>>> freeing >>>>>>> up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> How do YOU think he "freed up business to do business"? You said >>>> it, so >>>>>> you should be able to support the comment with a one or two >>>> sentence >>>>>> explanation. >>>>> >>>>> Good luck with that! >>>> >>>> >>>> Really. I don't supply idiots with answers. >>>> >>> Translation: I havent got any credible CITES for my bumper-sticker >>> based ideology. >>> >>> Its hard to defend a slogan, innit? >>> >>> ^_^ >> >> >>I don't have any 'cites' because it's kind of hard citing yourself. I >>form my own opinions, mostly based upon what people themselves say. I >>have satellite TV and satellite radio, and can hear people speking for >>themselves. THen I form my own opinions. >> >>Sorry if I can't give you a link to Limbaugh or Beck. >> >> > Which all explains why he does not have defensible positions. He lies. Bullshit.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:08 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:41:04 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:59:13 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku > ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things >>>>>>> in his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, >>>>>>> why should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard >>>>>>> someone else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what >>>>>>> they meant." >>>>>> >>>>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think >>>>> and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from >>>>> other sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat >>>>> these things. >>>> >>>> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >>>> answer is, "I didn't say that." >>> >>> >>> >>> Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more >>> information about them. And you ARE afraid. >> >> >>And you're as dumb as Aratzio... >> >> > In Hachoo world having knowledge, opinions and the guts to stand up for > your opinions is *dumb*. BWAHAHAHA! You and JSB, 'knowledge' and 'guts'??? BWAHAHAHA!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 16 Jun 2010 00:09
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:11:28 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:59:13 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things >>>>>>> in his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, >>>>>>> why should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard >>>>>>> someone else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what >>>>>>> they meant." >>>>>> >>>>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think >>>>> and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from >>>>> other sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat >>>>> these things. >>>> >>>> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >>>> answer is, "I didn't say that." >>> >>> >>> >>> Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more >>> information about them. And you ARE afraid. >> >> >> And you're as dumb as Aratzio... > > No, you're afraid. BWAHAHAHA! Wrong, as usual. My opinions don't fit the Politically Correct 'model', so they aren't valid? How awfully narrow-minded of you! |