Hachoo The Stupid
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Keeping my insurance rates low.. Thank you taxpayers..?
Next: please help me! i have a huge problem!
From: pandora on 15 Jun 2010 16:06 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:21:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:35:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing >>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf Reduce >>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type >>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>> >>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they wanted >>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude themselves >>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous >>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he couldnt >>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to their >>>>>> beliefs. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always >>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>> >>>>>> Word. >>>> >>>> >>>> See answer above. >>> >>> >>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the >>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >> >> >>I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan freeing >>up business to do business had a lot to do with it. > > So you are in accord with California republicans. > > Of which 25% are so completely insane they voted for Orly Taitz. > > Yep, some party you got there. It seems that he, like so many of their ilk, are only interested in making money.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 15 Jun 2010 21:56 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:06:56 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:21:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:35:10 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw¤£f wrote: >>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and closing >>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf Reduce >>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? Type >>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they wanted >>>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude themselves >>>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous >>>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he couldnt >>>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to their >>>>>>> beliefs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I always >>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Word. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> See answer above. >>>> >>>> >>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and the >>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>> >>> >>>I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan freeing >>>up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >> >> So you are in accord with California republicans. >> >> Of which 25% are so completely insane they voted for Orly Taitz. >> >> Yep, some party you got there. > > It seems that he, like so many of their ilk, are only interested in making > money. And the problem with that is....? I am for *anybody* making money. That's what's so great about Capitalism. "reditributing wealth" brings everyone to the same level of poverty. Unless you're a monied Democrat, of course.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 15 Jun 2010 21:58 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:03:30 -0600, §ñühw¤£f wrote: > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:40:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>> news:2VzRn.14001$3y2.8187(a)newsfe11.iad... >>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:38:47 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>> news:Q_yRn.30820$yx.25938(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:25:34 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:55:48 -0600, §ñühw£f wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ah wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2010 10:51 AM, §ñühw£f wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:7eVQn.76345$HG1.11538(a)newsfe21.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:10:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:zvTQn.57409$h57.40776(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:54 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can save 8 billion a year just by reducing and >> closing >>>>>>>>>>>> foreign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A sizeable chunk of change to be sure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're talking a President who wastes $80B a year. Big >> deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf >> Reduce >>>>>>>>>>>> troops in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe and Asia, cut end strength by 50,000 $80 b. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to ask? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Who is the last president you thought was terrific? >> Type >>>>>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> James Earl Carter. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heathen! Apostate! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He told the people what they *needed* to hear, not what they >> wanted >>>>>>>>> to hear. People will do any number of things to delude >> themselves >>>>>>>>> and Reagan offered up a nostalgic veiw of a once prosperous >>>>>>>>> Uhmurikuh and the sheeple went for it. The fact that he >> couldnt >>>>>>>>> deliver on it was less important than his ability to play to >> their >>>>>>>>> beliefs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Indeed you are correct, sir. The reality of the times was far >>>>>>>> different than what Reagan tried to convince us it was. I >> always >>>>>>>> thought of him as the wizard in Oz, all smoke and mirrors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Word. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See answer above. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Reagan was your favorite president, even though he fed you (and >> the >>>>>> country) bland cream of wheat diluted with way too much water. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I did quite well during the 80's. A lot of factors, but Reagan >> freeing >>>>> up business to do business had a lot to do with it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> How do YOU think he "freed up business to do business"? You said >> it, so >>>> you should be able to support the comment with a one or two >> sentence >>>> explanation. >>> >>> Good luck with that! >> >> >> Really. I don't supply idiots with answers. >> > Translation: I havent got any credible CITES for my bumper-sticker based > ideology. > > Its hard to defend a slogan, innit? > > ^_^ I don't have any 'cites' because it's kind of hard citing yourself. I form my own opinions, mostly based upon what people themselves say. I have satellite TV and satellite radio, and can hear people speking for themselves. THen I form my own opinions. Sorry if I can't give you a link to Limbaugh or Beck.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 15 Jun 2010 21:59 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:35:46 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:WhBRn.77391$HG1.3580(a)newsfe21.iad... >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:37 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>>>> I know. It's sort of minor hobby, trying to get him to put things in >>>>> his own words. I already know his response. "If you don't know, why >>>>> should I explain it to you?" Translated, that means "I heard someone >>>>> else say Reagan freed up business, but I have no clue what they >>>>> meant." >>>> >>>> If you could think your way out of a wet sock, it's be different. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> When someone asks you to back up your OPINION, it's YOUR job to think >>> and speak. Maybe you should stop parroting things you heard from other >>> sources, unless you're capable of explaining why you repeat these >>> things. >> >> I have opinions. You don't have privy to them because your standard >> answer is, "I didn't say that." > > > > Don't state your opinions if you're afraid of people asking for more > information about them. And you ARE afraid. And you're as dumb as Aratzio...
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 15 Jun 2010 22:00
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:20 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:03:03 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>Adults can see the facts without the idealogical goggles. Wingnuts and >>>>other exteremists on either side are left frothing like you do at the >>>>drop of his name. >> >> So, you liked the goggles thing. Cool. I expect you'll be using it a lot >> now. >> >> >>>>Watch: Obama >>>> >>>>How did that make you feel when you saw his name? >> >> That your an idiot? > ------------------------------ >> >> >>> *SPNAK* >> >> Sure. You can't even spell it right. > -------------------------------------- > > Hilarious! Let me know when you and dipshit start acting your ages and not like overgrown Kollege Kids, 'K? |