From: Jane Galt on
Michael <mrdarrett(a)gmail.com> wrote :

> On Mar 21, 10:03�pm, Jane Galt <Jan...(a)gulch.xyz> wrote:
>> Michael <mrdarr...(a)gmail.com> �wrote :
>>
>> > Oh, boy. �Obama is going to feel like he can do anything he wants,
>> > now.
>>
>> Now?! He's been ruling by executive orders for a year already.
>>
>> Who needs CONgress? Obsolete.
>>
>> We have a dictator.
>
>
> Well he hasn't done much for a year. Killed a fly on TV. Got a white
> cop and a black professor to talk over beer. That's about it. Now
> he'll think he's invincible.

No, I'm talking about Pelosi. She's the dictator. Obama is the REAL
"speaker", he gives nice speeches, while SHE dictates and takes away
freedoms and further destroys the Constitution.

They had you fooled, huh? You thought she was the speaker and he was the
President?

From: SMS on
On 22/03/10 7:38 PM, C. E. White wrote:

> "The Government Accountability Office reported that in 2006, the plans
> earned profits of 6.6 percent, had overhead (sales, etc.) of 10.1
> percent, and provided 83.3 percent of the revenue dollar in medical
> benefits. These administrative costs are far higher than traditional
> fee-for-service Medicare."

Medicare Advantage can continue, but the government needs to equalize
the amount they pay to the same amount as what they pay for
fee-for-service Medicare. Alas, most seniors won't understand the sweet
deal they've been getting under Medicare Advantage until the plans are
no longer are subsidized at such a high level. Medicare Advantage was a
sweet deal for the private insurance companies also. That's the problem
here, everyone expects the government to pay for their extra benefits.
From: C. E. White on

"SMS" <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in message
news:4ba8d6c3$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> On 22/03/10 7:38 PM, C. E. White wrote:
>
>> "The Government Accountability Office reported that in 2006, the
>> plans
>> earned profits of 6.6 percent, had overhead (sales, etc.) of 10.1
>> percent, and provided 83.3 percent of the revenue dollar in medical
>> benefits. These administrative costs are far higher than
>> traditional
>> fee-for-service Medicare."
>
> Medicare Advantage can continue, but the government needs to
> equalize the amount they pay to the same amount as what they pay for
> fee-for-service Medicare. Alas, most seniors won't understand the
> sweet deal they've been getting under Medicare Advantage until the
> plans are no longer are subsidized at such a high level. Medicare
> Advantage was a sweet deal for the private insurance companies also.
> That's the problem here, everyone expects the government to pay for
> their extra benefits.

Exactly. Essentially Mike Hunters is attacking Government mandated
health care reform while he was getting a sweet deal on health care
paid for mostly with Government dollars. He is perfectly willing to
deny millions of US citizens government funded health care, while he
is enjoying government funded health care. He doesn't see how unfair
this is. He has convinced himself that he deserves the Government
benefits while trying to deny them to others. I'd say he was greedy,
but probably he is just confused because he listens to the wackos on
AM radio too much. He is confusing what is right with what is
entertaining.



Ed


From: Clive on
In message <nkxpn.104889$Ye4.74794(a)newsfe11.iad>, lil abner
<?@?.?.invalid> writes
>Thi will not stand unless our elected represenatives are gutless and
>trully owe their allegiance to something other than the Republic and
>American citizens.
You sound bitter. Remember that you've got the party that you voted in
to government, if you don't like then you can always vote them out next
time around.
--
Clive

From: Clive on
In message <80ntp1FenvU1(a)mid.individual.net>, Bill Putney
<bptn(a)kinez.net> writes
>Nope - invented and currently practiced in countries with socialized
>medicine and advocated by Obama tzars. You obviously don't read enough.
Death panels are where exactly?
--
Clive