From: IYM "S U N on
jr92 wrote:
> On Feb 11, 10:40 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:56:32 -0500, IYM wrote:
>>> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:38 -0500, clare wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:03:57 -0500, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:13:48 -0500, Mike Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>> That is largest number of different types of vehicles, as well as the
>>>>>>> highest total number, ever recalled by ANY other vehicle manufacturer
>>>>>>> in history according the AP story.
>>>>>> Bullshit. Ford had a recall of 12M vehicles for exploding cruise
>>>>>> controls.
>>>>> You need to look at the total number of vehicles each company had on
>>>>> the road at the time of the recalls, and the number involved.
>>>>> The percentage of Toyotas on the road subject to recall, even with the
>>>>> MASSIVE recalls currently under way, are significantly lower than the
>>>>> percentage of either Ford or GM over the years.
>>>> You're preaching to the chior. Over the years GM Ford and Chysler have
>>>> recalled millions and millions of vehicles for even more serious issues
>>>> than this; Ford even got away with issuing dashboard stickers for
>>>> transmissions that could slip from Park to Reverse.
>>> OMG! I remember that! But it wasn't that they would slip into
>>> reverse...I had a '76 Ford Granada with a automatic tranny that when you
>>> put it in park it occasionally wouldn't engage fully in the tranny, but on
>>> the column it was fine. The first time I discovered this, I had parked it
>>> on a very slight incline, got out of the car and started to walk away and
>>> then I heard "tick-tick-tick-tick..." getting progressively faster and
>>> looked to see the car rolling away! Had to run after it, unlock it while
>>> moving and jump in to hit the brake...Glad there was nothing around! lol
>>> Thier fix at the time was to issue a letter that said that this might
>>> happen and you should use the parking brake to prevent it from
>>> happening... lmao! NO car companies would not get away with that now, but
>>> Ford is a much different and better company now than in the 70's....and
>>> you have to remember too - Recalls were a "growing" evolution of car
>>> manufacturers and Gov'ts during that time. Back in the 60's 50's, 40's -
>>> There were no recalls...Things that happened on cars were considered
>>> "quirks" and owners were much more involved in the maintenance and fix of
>>> the cars than they are today's consumers, who demand 100% perfection all
>>> the time - no mistakes. So to say that "they got away with..." when you
>>> are referencing anything before, oh say around 1980 is kind of unfair.
>>> In fact, wasn't it the whole Ford Pinto gas tank thing in the 70's that
>>> really got the Gov't involved and the whole ball rolling on recalls and
>>> manufacturer's responsibility?
>> All true. What galls me is the people attacking TOyota and overlooking
>> some of these magnificent recalls from American companies, like recalls
>> are something new.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
> Recalls are by far nothing new. I remember when the likes of USA Today
> would front-page ANY recall GM or Ford had, no matter how insignicant
> it would be as far as safety or reliability was concerned.
>
> The big thing is the total number of recalls the Toyotas are having
> today. It's totally in the tens of millions over the past few years,
> and like a snowball rolling downhill, growing on an almost daily
> basis. You can whitewash it any way you want, they have major issues
> to deal with.
>
> And, unlike the tire pressure monitor, or dome light malfunction, or
> heaven forbid, the leaking gasket recalls GM had in the 80's and 90's,
> Toyota has REAL safety and relibility issues.
>
> Sludging engines.
>
> Rusting suspensions.
>
> Throttles sticking wide open.
>
>
> Braking issues.
>
>
> If you feel that Toyota is being unfairly attacked, then you know
> exactly how I feel about the way GM has been attacked for the past
> 25-30 years.
>
>
> Now, just compare the things on which the GM and Toyota were attacked.


Hey - just want to let everyone know that Toyota has gotten into
manufacturing keyboards and I picked one up today. Little pricey but
the quality seems
okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

damn.....never mind... :)
From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)


"Clive" <Clive(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote in message


From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)


"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message news:4B747DAE.4050601(a)msu.edu...
> Mike Hunter wrote:
>> (Cross posting deleted, automatically)
>>


From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)


<clare(a)snyder.on.ca> wrote in message
news:gpc9n5lkj45c6n0sfn84467rafmlqsfk5p(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:44:01 -0500, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>


From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)


"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:hl2i8k$auu$5(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:51:29 -0500, clare wrote:
>
>> And just when, for the information