From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)

"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ZeWdnc15VqdSQOvWnZ2dnUVZ_tZi4p2d(a)speakeasy.net...
> On 02/13/2010 08:34 AM, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:56:14 -0800, jim beam<me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> On the rough roads of central Africa the American cars would not have
>>>> stood up well either. Killed my '67 Peugeot too. The '49 VW stood up
>>>> pretty well, considering!!!
>>>
>>> i always thought these were fun:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:220505_simca.jpg
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alpine_A110_1600_-_001.jpg
>>
>
>
> --
> nomina rutrum rutrum


From: Clive on
In message <o2ldn59i3j2jneobc8hd8i2fhcieg1i8uv(a)4ax.com>,
clare(a)snyder.on.ca writes
>UGLY, yes, but it would outhandle just about anything I could put it
>up against, and the suspension soaked up the WORST roads.. With the
>1300 engine it was underpowered, but the handling ballanced things
>out.
In those days the Renault 12 just like the Citroen GS had small
displacement ,high revving engines to give them a bit of power. This
was because the French government of the day taxed cars by engine
displacement, (cc in England, cubes in America) and not by BHP.
--
Clive

From: jim beam on
On 02/13/2010 09:35 AM, Clive wrote:
> In message <o2ldn59i3j2jneobc8hd8i2fhcieg1i8uv(a)4ax.com>,
> clare(a)snyder.on.ca writes
>> UGLY, yes, but it would outhandle just about anything I could put it
>> up against, and the suspension soaked up the WORST roads.. With the
>> 1300 engine it was underpowered, but the handling ballanced things
>> out.
> In those days the Renault 12 just like the Citroen GS had small
> displacement ,high revving engines to give them a bit of power.

the way it should be imo.


> This was
> because the French government of the day taxed cars by engine
> displacement, (cc in England, cubes in America) and not by BHP.

--
nomina rutrum rutrum
From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)


"Clive" <Clive(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:+8xkYmAMLudLFw75(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk...
> In message <o2ldn59i3j2jneobc8hd8i2fhcieg1i8uv(a)4ax.com>,
> clare(a)snyder.on.ca writes
>>UGLY, yes, but it would outhandle just about anything I could put it
>>up against, and the suspension soaked up the WORST roads.. With the
>>1300 engine it was underpowered, but the handling ballanced things
>>out.
> In those days the Renault 12 just like the Citroen GS had small
> displacement ,high revving engines to give them a bit of power. This was
> because the French government of the day taxed cars by engine
> displacement, (cc in England, cubes in America) and not by BHP.
> --
> Clive
>


From: Mike Hunter on
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)


"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
news:9budnfMqdbT6eOvWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)speakeasy.net...
> On 02/13/2010 09:35 AM, Clive wrote:
>> In message <o2ldn59i3j2jneobc8hd8i2fhcieg1i8uv(a)4ax.com>,
>> clare(a)snyder.on.ca writes
>>> UGLY, yes, but it would outhandle just about anything I could put it
>>> up against, and the suspension soaked up the WORST roads.. With the
>>> 1300 engine it was underpowered, but the handling ballanced things
>>> out.
>> In those days the Renault 12 just like the Citroen GS had small
>> displacement ,high revving engines to give them a bit of power.
>
> the way it should be imo.
>
>
>> This was
>> because the French government of the day taxed cars by engine
>> displacement, (cc in England, cubes in America) and not by BHP.
>
> --
> nomina rutrum rutrum