{BS} Movement afoot to drop "anchor babies"
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 10 Aug 2010 21:39 On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:14:22 -0700, PrecisionmachinisT wrote: > > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:ycl8o.56973$dx7.35124(a)newsfe21.iad... >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:36:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:51:15 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >> > >> >> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >> >> news:b0qv56lhutmr67j54tdij90pl28kad4g30(a)4ax.com... >> >> >> >> >> >>> Where are they going to deport the Indians to? >> >>> >> >>> >> >> Skin color isn't a factor--either produce the papers, or off to Mexico >> >> you go ..... >> >> >> >> -- >> > >> > How do you know who is from Mexico? >> >> OK, then, Canada. >> > > Unikely you'll ever catch on.... More likely than you think... > >> >> Honestly, pandora, sometimes I get the impression you just don't love me >> any more... >>
From: pandora on 10 Aug 2010 22:03 On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:56:22 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:36:59 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:24:14 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:36:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:51:15 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>>>> news:b0qv56lhutmr67j54tdij90pl28kad4g30(a)4ax.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Where are they going to deport the Indians to? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Skin color isn't a factor--either produce the papers, or off to >>>>> Mexico you go ..... >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> How do you know who is from Mexico? >>> >>> OK, then, Canada. >>> >> You're now changing the original statement to something else. And yet, >> how would anyone know who was from Canada? > > Um, 'cause you said so? I'm a stranger on the street. How do you know where I'm from? >>> Honestly, pandora, sometimes I get the impression you just don't love >>> me any more... >> >> Never did. > > See what I mean?
From: pandora on 10 Aug 2010 22:04 On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:10:49 -0700, PrecisionmachinisT wrote: > "pandora" <pandora(a)peak.org> wrote in message > news:daCdnVzOjfvsSfzRnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com... >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:51:15 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >> >> > "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >> > news:b0qv56lhutmr67j54tdij90pl28kad4g30(a)4ax.com... >> > >> > >> >> Where are they going to deport the Indians to? >> >> >> >> >> > Skin color isn't a factor--either produce the papers, or off to >> > Mexico you go ..... >> > >> > -- >> >> How do you know who is from Mexico? > > You catch on quickly. Go tell that to Hachoo.
From: pandora on 10 Aug 2010 22:16 On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:14:22 -0700, PrecisionmachinisT wrote: > > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:ycl8o.56973$dx7.35124(a)newsfe21.iad... >>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:36:33 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:51:15 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >>> > >>> >> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>> >> news:b0qv56lhutmr67j54tdij90pl28kad4g30(a)4ax.com... >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Where are they going to deport the Indians to? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Skin color isn't a factor--either produce the papers, or off to >>> >> Mexico you go ..... >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> > >>> > How do you know who is from Mexico? >>> >>> OK, then, Canada. >>> >>> >> Unikely you'll ever catch on.... > > More likely than you think... > Not as evidenced by anything you've written here. >> >>> Honestly, pandora, sometimes I get the impression you just don't love >>> me any more... >>>
From: ah on 10 Aug 2010 22:43
On 8/9/2010 8:52 PM, Aratzio wrote: > On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:52:36 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, > ah <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On 8/8/2010 8:14 PM, Aratzio wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:15:00 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On 8/8/2010 1:27 AM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:18:08 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>> >>>>>>On 8/7/2010 6:30 PM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 17:04:44 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>>>>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On 8/7/2010 9:30 AM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 06:29:03 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>>>>>>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On 8/6/2010 9:55 PM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:41:05 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>>>>>>>>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On 8/5/2010 11:30 PM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:47:21 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>>>>>>>>>>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 8/4/2010 9:16 PM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:05:26 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 8/3/2010 9:57 PM, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:54:05 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:58:23 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:33:51 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, pandora >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It is certainly beginning to look that way. What is it about these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>idiots that makes them HATE the US and all that it stands for? They >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>aren't ONLY interested in getting their own but doing their best to keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>everyone else from getting anything at all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nutshell, the middle class is disappearing and tey feel threatened. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not that the poor or less fortunate are rising to their level so much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as they are dropping the the lower rungs of the economic ladder. What >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they see as their historical perogative is being stripped away. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That is a distinct possibility. So, it's really all a class struggle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with a touch of racism thrown in for good measure? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Racism in the sense that they feel those beneath them on the economic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ladder are less important. Since most of the people they see as being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below them are minorities the anger is then directed at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minorities. There is actual racism there is no doubt but if you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put most of them in front of a person of color there would not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racism. It is more a generalized feeling than an actual thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process. Classic example is the interviews of the Teabaggers holding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist signs and they don't even have a clue it is a racist sign. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The anger should be directed at those that are stripping away the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> middle class and destroying our ability to manufacture. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These angry people are the same people that scream and rant about any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cuts to military spending but do not realize that same stripping of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manufacturing capability will also destroy our long term ability to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend ourselves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The loss of the middle class with bankrupt the nation and at that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point we will no longer have the economic or military ability to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend ourselves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The sad thing is the people they support are the people who have done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the most damage to the middle class in the USA to favor their rich >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributors. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Absolutely agreed! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They firmly believe that they too will one day be part of the ruling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class, because the ruling class keeps lying to them about their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to become the ruling class. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, but we'll all be millionaires, one day! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Umm, err, what if one already is? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>braggart! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I dinna sez I werz. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I wished to know what we do with the ones already there? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Provide essential services, of course ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wine & Cheese? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>rol Something like that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Me ain't in them classerz. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I just do things for 'em; things that they don't want to do. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Beer & Pretzels. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Stout and pork-rinds. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>TYVM. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ale & Pickled Eggs <FART> >>>>>> >>>>>>Port and FETA. >>>>> >>>>> Urrr, no. >>>>> >>>>> Port & Chocolate. >>>> >>>>ew >>> >>> Better than cigars >> >>Apart from a singular cheroot-like Dutch I enjoyed post-borst (yes, /that/ >>borst) with an exile from the pogroms of the post-Nazi era, I wholeheartedly >>agree with this assessment. > > The gentlemen shall retire to the study for Port & Cigars... > > (A cousin of my mother is married to a Wrigley, that was announced > after a dinner in Arizona some years ago) Forced cigars could be construed as torture. -- a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h |