{BS} Weiner Meltdown!
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Jul 2010 20:11 Weiner melts down on the floor because "Republicans" wouldn't back the "First Responders" bill. Rants and raves about "Republicans" turning their backs. WHy didn't the bill pass on Democrat votes only? They have enough people to pass anything. House Floor Speech Meltdown of the Week By Doug Powers • July 30, 2010 01:23 PM **Written by Doug Powers Yesterday, New York Rep. Anthony Weiner tried to channel Nikita Khrushchev minus the shoe and even some of the dignity, believe it or not. These outbursts aren't rarities for Weiner, but this hissy fit was especially 'roid-ragey. http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/30/house-floor-speech-meltdown-of-the-week/
From: edspyhill01 on 30 Jul 2010 23:36 On Jul 30, 8:11 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > Weiner melts down on the floor because "Republicans" wouldn't back the > "First Responders" bill. Rants and raves about "Republicans" turning their > backs. > > WHy didn't the bill pass on Democrat votes only? They have enough people > to pass anything. > > House Floor Speech Meltdown of the Week > By Doug Powers * July 30, 2010 01:23 PM > > **Written by Doug Powers > > Yesterday, New York Rep. Anthony Weiner tried to channel Nikita Khrushchev > minus the shoe and even some of the dignity, believe it or not. These > outbursts aren$B!G(Bt rarities for Weiner, but this hissy fit was especially > $B!F(Broid-ragey. > > http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/30/house-floor-speech-meltdown-of-t... That is what is needed. I applaud Anthony Weiner. More republicans need to be called out. We didn't elect these guys to act like their jobs are to enact symbolic warfare. The republican strategies are wearing thin. They were elected to govern. If the republicans need their testosterone stirred they should do paintball warfare.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 31 Jul 2010 00:45 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:36:11 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Jul 30, 8:11 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> Weiner melts down on the floor because "Republicans" wouldn't back the >> "First Responders" bill. Rants and raves about "Republicans" turning their >> backs. >> >> WHy didn't the bill pass on Democrat votes only? They have enough people >> to pass anything. >> >> House Floor Speech Meltdown of the Week >> By Doug Powers * July 30, 2010 01:23 PM >> >> **Written by Doug Powers >> >> Yesterday, New York Rep. Anthony Weiner tried to channel Nikita Khrushchev >> minus the shoe and even some of the dignity, believe it or not. These >> outbursts aren't rarities for Weiner, but this hissy fit was especially >> 'roid-ragey. >> >> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/30/house-floor-speech-meltdown-of-t... > > That is what is needed. I applaud Anthony Weiner. More republicans > need to be called out. We didn't elect these guys to act like their > jobs are to enact symbolic warfare. The republican strategies are > wearing thin. They were elected to govern. If the republicans need > their testosterone stirred they should do paintball warfare. What about the Democrats that didn't vote for it? Why didn't he say anything about his own party? If he needed more votes, why didn't he go after the Dems that didn't vote for it? Sonds to me like there's something fishy in the bill, some kind of rider, that some people don't want their name associated with...
From: edspyhill01 on 31 Jul 2010 09:15 On Jul 31, 12:45 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:36:11 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > > On Jul 30, 8:11 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> Weiner melts down on the floor because "Republicans" wouldn't back the > >> "First Responders" bill. Rants and raves about "Republicans" turning their > >> backs. > > >> WHy didn't the bill pass on Democrat votes only? They have enough people > >> to pass anything. > > >> House Floor Speech Meltdown of the Week > >> By Doug Powers * July 30, 2010 01:23 PM > > >> **Written by Doug Powers > > >> Yesterday, New York Rep. Anthony Weiner tried to channel Nikita Khrushchev > >> minus the shoe and even some of the dignity, believe it or not. These > >> outbursts aren$B!G(Bt rarities for Weiner, but this hissy fit was especially > >> $B!F(Broid-ragey. > > >>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/30/house-floor-speech-meltdown-of-t... > > > That is what is needed. I applaud Anthony Weiner. More republicans > > need to be called out. We didn't elect these guys to act like their > > jobs are to enact symbolic warfare. The republican strategies are > > wearing thin. They were elected to govern. If the republicans need > > their testosterone stirred they should do paintball warfare. > > What about the Democrats that didn't vote for it? Why didn't he say > anything about his own party? If he needed more votes, why didn't he go > after the Dems that didn't vote for it? > > Sonds to me like there's something fishy in the bill, some kind of rider, > that some people don't want their name associated with...- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Most dems voted against it because of the amendments the republicans added, one being the extention of the bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Wiener was correct, the republicans are stalling everything until the mid-terms. They are putting the farm on one bet. Meanwhile the American people suffer. A simple fix - you want a filibuster, then bring in the phone books and talk, talk, talk.
From: Ian B MacLure on 31 Jul 2010 11:29 =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in news:NSJ4o.10028$mW5.3868(a)newsfe14.iad: > Weiner melts down on the floor because "Republicans" wouldn't back the > "First Responders" bill. Rants and raves about "Republicans" turning > their backs. > > WHy didn't the bill pass on Democrat votes only? They have enough > people to pass anything. Whiner sees November approaching and is frantic to get Dhimmicrap priorities passed cause he knows opportunity is slip slidin away. IBM
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Riding a bike in London is risky business Next: {BS} Movement afoot to drop "anchor babies" |