From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:40:15 -0500, pandora wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:32:05 -0400, Kali wrote:
>
>> In article <paqdnYd9pJmeXvzRnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com>, pandora
>> pandora(a)peak.org says...
>>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:30:27 -0400, Kali wrote:
>>>
>>> > In article <Xns9DCEEE6AE475FJaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142>, Jane Galt
>>> > Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz says...
>>> >>
>>> >> pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> wrote :
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:08:58 -0500, Jane Galt wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?=
>>> >> >> <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote :
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Yes, we do. You can't seem to understand that you need to
>>> >> >>> provide whatever ID you are requested to.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Sounds like nazi Germany.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> YOUR PAPERS?!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > That has been pointed out to him before. He seems to enjoy the
>>> >> > idea of living in a fascist country. Talk about being UNamerican.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> http://books.google.com/books?
>>> id=wHihWKJE3asC&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=
>>> >> 1&l=220
>>> >
>>> > Jonah Goldberg. He used the title to sell his books, and get idiots
>>> > like you to call attention to it, as if he were making any case at
>>> > all about liberals being fascists in his book. He's almost as smart
>>> > and every bit as honest and reliable as the now-humiliated Breidbart.
>>> >
>>> > There's such a disconnect in the minds of those on the far right who
>>> > are one minute whining about how their "freedoms" are being taken
>>> > away, and the next minute laying down or bending over for things like
>>> > the patriot act and the unconstitutional Arizona law. The right seems
>>> > oblivious to the fact that the religious among them would prefer a
>>> > theocracy over a democracy. Talk about losing freedom! Legislate
>>> > according to the Christian bible? What about the Constitution, eh?
>>> >
>>> > Look up fascism in a good history book, for crying out loud. Look up
>>> > Weimer moment. Fascism springs from authoritarianism and thus is not
>>> > likely to come from your left. As Sinclair Lewis once famously said,
>>> > "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and
>>> > carrying a cross." You betcha.
>>>
>>> IAWTP!
>>
>> http://snipurl.com/sarahflagcross
>
> Scarey.
>
>> winkies! lol
>
> Back atcha!

k0000000000000k.


From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:32:52 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>Who said fascism? I never said that.

How many times had Hachoo used "I didn't say that" as his first
backpedal.

From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:33:41 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>k0000000000000k.
>

Yes, he really did screed that.
From: Kali on
In article <e00466tahmjeb0j8onjc8fk6t2l97q725r(a)4ax.com>, Aratzio
a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:32:52 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
> >Who said fascism? I never said that.
>
> How many times had Hachoo used "I didn't say that" as his first
> backpedal.

He was posting about nationalized socialism! HAHAHAHA!

Still waiting on the definition.

--
Kali
From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:30:31 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Kali
<yourgoddesskali(a)gmail.inv> got double secret probation for writing:

>In article <e00466tahmjeb0j8onjc8fk6t2l97q725r(a)4ax.com>, Aratzio
>a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:32:52 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>> >Who said fascism? I never said that.
>>
>> How many times had Hachoo used "I didn't say that" as his first
>> backpedal.
>
>He was posting about nationalized socialism! HAHAHAHA!
>
>Still waiting on the definition.

You will be waiting, he never stands up for his own writings. It is
always the fault of the reader for not grasping his elegant
incoherence.