Wingnuts fail again.
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: {BS} Here's a "Personal Comment" that won't get displayed!
Next: Douchebag "john" posts recall alerts, obtains attention he missed out on as child.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Aug 2010 20:28 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:45:39 -0400, ah wrote: > On 8/2/2010 9:01 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:31:05 -0400, ah wrote: >> >>>> >>>> If you get stopped for ANY reason on the UMASS campus they search your >>>> car. Try to stop them and they impound it and bring you in for >>>> questioning. So search the car! Who cares? >>> >>> Uh, I do. It's mine, and there is absolutely no reason for them to put their >>> fingerprints on it. >> >> They wear latex gloves. > > The only person I've ever seen wear latex gloves outside of a hospital was a > WASP Princess on her wedding night. You went to Chelsea's wedding?
From: Jeff The Drunk on 4 Aug 2010 20:56 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:26:24 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:27:01 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>> "I don't care what you say, LALALALALALALALA I cant hear you" >>> >>>Nah, leave off the "LALALALALA...." part. I can 'hear' you just fine. >>> >>>Nobody really cares what you say. Haven't gotten that point yet, eh? >>> >>> >> So when you just wined about Pandora agreeing with me? > > That's nothing to be bragging about... Speaking of wine.....heh
From: Aratzio on 4 Aug 2010 21:41 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:26:24 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:27:01 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>> "I don't care what you say, LALALALALALALALA I cant hear you" >>> >>>Nah, leave off the "LALALALALA...." part. I can 'hear' you just fine. >>> >>>Nobody really cares what you say. Haven't gotten that point yet, eh? >>> >>> >> So when you just wined about Pandora agreeing with me? > >That's nothing to be bragging about... > > Not much of a surprise there that your delusions can't even stand up to a cursory examnation.
From: ah on 5 Aug 2010 21:35 [follow-upset] On 8/4/2010 8:28 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:45:39 -0400, ah wrote: > >> On 8/2/2010 9:01 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:31:05 -0400, ah wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> If you get stopped for ANY reason on the UMASS campus they search your >>>>> car. Try to stop them and they impound it and bring you in for >>>>> questioning. So search the car! Who cares? >>>> >>>> Uh, I do. It's mine, and there is absolutely no reason for them to put their >>>> fingerprints on it. >>> >>> They wear latex gloves. >> >> The only person I've ever seen wear latex gloves outside of a hospital was a >> WASP Princess on her wedding night. > > > You went to Chelsea's wedding? You want pics? -- a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
From: ah on 5 Aug 2010 21:42
On 7/29/2010 7:07 PM, Meat Plow wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:57:03 -0700, miguel wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:15:24 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:01:43 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:36:28 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> <YAWN> Here we go with the straw man of "infringing on the rights >>>>>>> of US citizens." The law wasn't written about US citizens or Legal >>>>>>> Aliens. Why did you have a Green Card? You have to produce it if >>>>>>> asked for it. There is nothing illegal or unconstitutional about >>>>>>> that. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not a citizen. And yes, the law, as written, would do exactly >>>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> How so? If you have a Green Card, you have to produce it to any LEA >>>>> asking to see it. You know that. You could just be walking down the >>>>> street, and if a cop comes up to you and asks you for ID, are you >>>>> going to refuse? >>>> >>>> Of course not. But then, I'm not a US citizen and I'm *required* to >>>> carry my Green Card on me at all times. US citizens are not required >>>> to do that. As well, it was an agreement that I made in order to be >>>> allowed to live and work here. No such agreement is given by those >>>> born here. >>>> >>>> We've been through this before and all I can conclude is that you just >>>> don't wish to admit that the Arizona law impinged on the rights of >>>> legal US citizens and residents. >>> >>>Not being too well informed on that law but trusting your knowledge on >>>it, what rights of US citizens are being impinged upon? >> >> Among other things, it required the police to arrest and detain any >> immigrant, legal or illegal, until immigration status was determined. > > Ah ok. And you can cite that precisely? Also cite the guidelines for > determining who is an immigrant and who isn't. 1. Skin colo(u)r. -- a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h |