From: pandora on
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:35:08 -0400, ah wrote:

> [follow-upset]
>
> On 8/4/2010 8:28 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:45:39 -0400, ah wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/2/2010 9:01 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:31:05 -0400, ah wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> If you get stopped for ANY reason on the UMASS campus they search
>>>>>> your car. Try to stop them and they impound it and bring you in for
>>>>>> questioning. So search the car! Who cares?
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh, I do. It's mine, and there is absolutely no reason for them to
>>>>> put their fingerprints on it.
>>>>
>>>> They wear latex gloves.
>>>
>>> The only person I've ever seen wear latex gloves outside of a hospital
>>> was a WASP Princess on her wedding night.
>>
>>
>> You went to Chelsea's wedding?
>
> You want pics?

Heh. I've got some terrific pictures of the wedding *I* went to. It was
lovely.
From: Aratzio on
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:28:29 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Conscience <nobama(a)wurk.again> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On 2010-08-07 22:24:31 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said:
>> *Same old lame bullshit. Not worth a reply.
>
>They why keep replying? I've been gone for how long, and you're still
>entertaining this idiot?

Really, why are you entertaining *that* idiot.

(Mi Engrish iz gud, eye noes wot "this" meens)

Would you like a bandage for that foot?

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:28:29 -0700, Conscience wrote:

> On 2010-08-07 22:24:31 -0700, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said:
>> *Same old lame bullshit. Not worth a reply.
>
> They why keep replying? I've been gone for how long, and you're still
> entertaining this idiot?


Wrong. The idiot is entertaining *me*



From: Aratzio on
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 11:45:37 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:28:29 -0700, Conscience wrote:
>
>> On 2010-08-07 22:24:31 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said:
>>> *Same old lame bullshit. Not worth a reply.
>>
>> They why keep replying? I've been gone for how long, and you're still
>> entertaining this idiot?
>
>
>Wrong. The idiot is entertaining *me*
>
>
<STOMP>
From: Aratzio on
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 08:58:02 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Conscience <nobama(a)wurk.again> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On 2010-08-08 08:45:37 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said:
>
>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:28:29 -0700, Conscience wrote:
>>
>>> On 2010-08-07 22:24:31 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said:
>>>> *Same old lame bullshit. Not worth a reply.
>>>
>>> They why keep replying? I've been gone for how long, and you're still
>>> entertaining this idiot?
>>
>>
>> Wrong. The idiot is entertaining *me*
>
>That may be a matter of perspective, my friend. Why waste your time
>with the vacuous, whose threshhold of "entertainment" is far lower?
>
>I'm sure you've noticed who I don't read or consequently reply to any longer.

Poor Bill, another in the cavalcade of gormless cowards bullied into
apologies for something he never did.

I also highly approved of his drama queen exit and return.

Yeah, him and Meat, can't call them a *pair*...