From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:55:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>So just where the hell have you been? Found a new chew toy?
>
> You and the ToyotaTards are morons. You know, boring mouth breathers
> with out the ability to think beyond what the Limbaughs & Becks of the
> world tell you to think.

Glad to see you're well...



From: larry moe 'n curly on

Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
> >
> > SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds.
>
> Bullshit. Derailed by Vox Populus. Nothing to do with "constitutional grounds".

You'd have a point if most Arizonans were against SB1070, but in
reality about 60% of the people here are in favor of it, according to
this July 25 poll:

www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/07/25/20100725immigration-poll-demographic.html


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:14:47 -0500, pandora wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds.
>
> Yippee!


Figures an airhead like you would cheer this...


>HEAD: What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America?
>I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, "Mexican Visitor's Lament"- 10/25/07.
>
>I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, "illegal aliens pay
>rent, buy groceries, buy clothes. What Happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?"
>
> Hummm, I thought, what would happen, so I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below.
>It's a good question it deserves an honest answer. Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration
>stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America? The answers I found may surprise you!
>
>In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on
>overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested.
>Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.
>
>In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchilds would move back 'home', mostly to Mexico.
>
> That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling,
>medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.
>
>Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local
>citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other
>crimes by illegals.
>
>Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41
>different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our grid locked cities in Colorado. Denver's 4%
>unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.
>
>In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law, and English.
>In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and
>more crime-free experience.
>
>If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home', the U.S. Economy would return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal
>American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the
>books. That would result in an additional $401 Billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local,
>state and city coffers.
>
>No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English. No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100
>languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million
>illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.
>
>We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13
>gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.
>
>In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the '18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for
>ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!
>
>Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and
>driving American deaths by illegal aliens!
>
>America's economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the
>aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America 's
>economy which currently suffers an $8.7 trillion debt.
>
>$8.7 trillion debt.
>
>At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86
>hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because
>illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.
>
>Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country-brought in by illegals unscreened at our
>borders.
>
>Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the
>'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.
>Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas to San Diego,
>California in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay
>and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage,
>clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.
>
>The New York Times reported them to be America's new 'Third World' inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current
>growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's
>sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)
>
>By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico. We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own
>countries and/or make a better life in Mexico We already invite a million people into our country legally more than all other
>countries combined annually. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing
>lawlessness at every level in our nation. It's time to stand up for our
>country, our culture, our civilization and our way of

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:14:47 -0500, pandora wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds.
>
> Yippee!

Seriously, are you an idiot? I mean, really, legally, an idiot?

Why are you cheering this? Are you an illegal alien?
Did you come here legally? If so, why are you cheering a decision that
allows millions of people who didn't endure what you did to remain in the
US? No Green Card, no Immigration, nothing. They just crossed the border,
which by *Federal* law, is illegal.

Seriously, you really must have been legally declared an idiot at some
point in time. It appears only an idiot would cheer illegal activity.

Can you go back to Canada as soon as possible?




From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:54:19 -0700, larry moe 'n curly wrote:

>
> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>> >
>> > SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds.
>>
>> Bullshit. Derailed by Vox Populus. Nothing to do with "constitutional grounds".
>
> You'd have a point if most Arizonans were against SB1070, but in
> reality about 60% of the people here are in favor of it, according to
> this July 25 poll:
>
> www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/07/25/20100725immigration-poll-demographic.html


Then they are just ignoring the voice of the people.

"But it's not Constitutional".

Then this ruling merely opens the door to the declaration that all Federal
laws pertaining to immigration aren't Constitutional...