From: Mike Hunter on
Once again our friend Canuck57 is telling us the sky is falling LOL


"Canuck57" <Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:qJl9n.72167$uH1.1789(a)newsfe25.iad...
> On 31/01/2010 9:48 AM, Hachiroku ???? wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:30:15 +0000, Michael Golden wrote:
>>
>>> Canuck57 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe Obama should give GM to Toyota for $1 to get them out of the
>>>> taxpayers wallet.
>>>
>>> Actually, that sounds like a good idea.
>>
>>
>> But then, he'd want to get every dime that was invested i GM back, and
>> would probably place a fee on all car dealers to get it back.
>
> Nope, just GM and Chrysler ones. Squeeze the bastards so tight until it
> is paid off or they quit.


From: Mike Hunter on
Once again our friend Canuck57 is telling us the sky is falling LOL


"Canuck57" <Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:_Jl9n.72300$uH1.52844(a)newsfe25.iad...
> Double nothing is still nothing.
>
> On 31/01/2010 10:25 AM, Mike Hunter wrote:
>> Once again our friend Canuck57 is telling us the sky is falling LOL
>>
>>
>> "Canuck57"<Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:e789n.9371$4p5.7700(a)newsfe22.iad...
>>> On 30/01/2010 9:16 PM, Hachiroku wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:21:56 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30/01/2010 1:49 PM, Hachiroku ???? wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:25:18 -0500, Tom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Canuck57"<Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:eH%8n.68114$PI7.41298(a)newsfe17.iad...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Funny, Toyota is helping out GM Vibe customers. LMAO.
>>>>>>>> Why not toyota designed them and built them for GM. no wonder gm
>>>>>>>> dumped
>>>>>>>> them I am LMAOl
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who dumped WHO?!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you have that backwards.
>>>>>> Before I say what I'm going to say, bear in mind GM has had about 15
>>>>>> times
>>>>>> the number of recalls as Toyota.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toyota ended the relationship with GM.
>>>>>> I think it's because GM just didn't care.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOW LYAO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like GM walked away from pontiac owners....
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jalopnik.com/5303761/gm-says-goodbye-to-toyota-partnership-ships-nummi-to-old-gm
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1033610_gm-ends-25-year-nummi-partnership-with-toyota
>>>>>
>>>>> GM walked away.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I know that. Toyota was trying to help them build a higher
>>>> quality
>>>> car. Gm figured it didn't serve the shareholders to make cars a little
>>>> better. "We're losing money on every car we sell, but we'll make it up
>>>> on
>>>> volume."
>>>
>>> GM probably couldn't make enough for management bonuses, super fat
>>> pensions, Wagoner's take and the political contributions. Plus Toyota
>>> probably made GM pay it's bills or no cars.
>>
>>
>


From: Mike Hunter on
If GM made less on the Vibe, it was because GM sold it at an average of
$2,500 less than a Matrix with the same equipment


"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
news:NMydnQ6BT8yNjfvWnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...


From: dr_jeff on
Mike Hunter wrote:
> Get real! Toyota pulled our after GM gave up because they did not want to
> pay union wages or use 70% of parts made in the US as was a requirement in

Get Real yourself. There never was a requirement that 70% of the parts
be made in the US. (If I am wrong, prove it.) It's true that Toyota
didn't want to pay UAW wages. Another problem is that only 11% of the
parts where made within 400 mi of the plant. So the rest had to be
shipped in from far away.

Jeff

> "hls" <hls(a)nospam.nix> wrote in message
> news:ltednfuRl5yVnPvWnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2010.01.31.20.26.00.980275(a)e86.GTS...
>>
>>> Toyota pulled out of NUMMI after GM suggested something, I can't recall
>>> now, but it was something similar to Democrats trying the same thing over
>>> and over and expecting a different result, and Toyota said, "ENOUGH!!!"
>>>
>> It was discussed on the group some time ago.
>> IIRC, GM pulled out related to the cost cutting times around the
>> bankruptcy.
>> The plant had always been a disaster, too expensive.
>> Toyota had no reason to continue to use this plant with Pontiac gone and
>> no Vibe to make. The high cost of California did this one it.
>
>
From: Mike Hunter on
What part of, 70% of parts made in the US as was a requirement in the UAW
contract, did you not understand? You are partly correct, the remaining
30% were shipped in from far away, as in imported, like most of the parts in
the other Toyotas assembled in the US.

"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
news:0eednSfKfvUjg_vWnZ2dnUVZ_sNi4p2d(a)giganews.com...
> Mike Hunter wrote:
>> Get real! Toyota pulled our after GM gave up because they did not want
>> to pay union wages or use 70% of parts made in the US as was a
>> requirement in the UAW contract
>
> Get Real yourself. There never was a requirement that 70% of the parts be
> made in the US. (If I am wrong, prove it.) It's true that Toyota didn't
> want to pay UAW wages. Another problem is that only 11% of the parts where
> made within 400 mi of the plant. So the rest had to be shipped in from far
> away.
>
> Jeff
>
>> "hls" <hls(a)nospam.nix> wrote in message
>> news:ltednfuRl5yVnPvWnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2010.01.31.20.26.00.980275(a)e86.GTS...
>>>
>>>> Toyota pulled out of NUMMI after GM suggested something, I can't recall
>>>> now, but it was something similar to Democrats trying the same thing
>>>> over
>>>> and over and expecting a different result, and Toyota said, "ENOUGH!!!"
>>>>
>>> It was discussed on the group some time ago.
>>> IIRC, GM pulled out related to the cost cutting times around the
>>> bankruptcy.
>>> The plant had always been a disaster, too expensive.
>>> Toyota had no reason to continue to use this plant with Pontiac gone and
>>> no Vibe to make. The high cost of California did this one it.
>>