From: Not Me General Obama is an on
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:26:05 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:35:43 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:18:58 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>>
>>>>This incident with the skimmers just shows the lack of leadership by the
>>>>President and other government officials. Most people, certainly the
>>>>local residents, recognized that the government systems to deal with the
>>>>oil spill were inadequate. It took over 6 weeks for the government to
>>>>allow the state of Louisiana to build sand berms to protect the marshes,
>>>>after oil has already entered the marshes. Decisions need to be made,
>>>>often without full information and sometimes conflicting rules and
>>>>regulations. The oil well did not stop spilling oil as the government
>>>>tried to study the problems and make recommendations. There was no one
>>>>with the authority to make the fast decisions necessary to combat the
>>>>spill. "
>>>
>>> There's no proof they would have made much of a difference in an OCEAN.
>>
>>LOL! So, let's not take the assistance, and make SURE they have no effect.
>
>I said we should have taken the help. When are you going to get that
>through your thick head?
>
>You've yet to prove it would have made much of a difference.

We're all tired of your childish nonsense.

Type * How effective are oil skimmers* in Google and read for
yourself. Then you can scream and throw a temper tantrum at Google
for more proof.


From: Kulin Remailer on
"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:egar26187c4v15l4ihmjt3i8t55idmmgas(a)4ax.com...

> It's fun to watch to idiots who know they've lost get together to
> comfort each other : )
>

Nice gibberish, retard. You don't need any help making yourself look
like a drooling fuckwit.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:22:18 +0000, Kulin Remailer wrote:

> "Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:egar26187c4v15l4ihmjt3i8t55idmmgas(a)4ax.com...
>
>> It's fun to watch to idiots who know they've lost get together to
>> comfort each other : )
>>
>>
> Nice gibberish, retard. You don't need any help making yourself look like
> a drooling fuckwit.

Good comeback, Mr Remailer, friggin' coward.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:00:56 -0500, Lookout wrote:

>>Considering they were held off by bureaucacy, it's a little hard.
>>
>>Maybe if they had been allowed on site from the start it would have made
>>a difference.
>
> "maybe" You're whining about this with no proof what so ever? What the
> hell is wrong with you?

Because 170 offers for help were blocked by the Obungle Administration.

>>
>>We'll see. A skimmer with the ability to handle 1,000,000 gallons a day
>>just arrived in the Gulf.
>
> JUST arrived AFTER it was specifically retrofitted to do this type work.
> If WAS NOT AVAILIBLE earlier.

But others were and were denied entry to US waters.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:58:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:41:34 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
> Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:09:21 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:29:52 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:32:07 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:00:56 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Considering they were held off by bureaucacy, it's a little hard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Maybe if they had been allowed on site from the start it would have
>>>>>>>made a difference.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "maybe" You're whining about this with no proof what so ever? What
>>>>>> the hell is wrong with you?
>>>>>
>>>>>Plenty of proof. Can you use Google? Or is talking through your hat
>>>>>more your style?
>>>>
>>>> SHOW me. Until you do I think you're lying.
>>>>
>>>>>>>We'll see. A skimmer with the ability to handle 1,000,000 gallons a
>>>>>>>day just arrived in the Gulf.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JUST arrived AFTER it was specifically retrofitted to do this type
>>>>>> work. If WAS NOT AVAILIBLE earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>>Others were, and were turned away. Again, Google it before talking
>>>>>through your hat.
>>>>
>>>> Prove how much of a difference they would have made. Why is that so
>>>> hard to do if you're so sure of it?
>>>
>>><YAWN> Bite me.
>>>
>>HAHAH See? When asked for proof you run like a little girl. Why do FACTS
>>bother you so much? I know why..because they don't gel with the lies
>>you've been told.
>
> Get used to it, he has a bumper sticker mind. He can't prove what he knows
> because he read it on a bumper sticker.
>
> That or he will claim to have heard something on some show at some time in
> the past so you are just wrong.

You are always wrong.