BP burning sea turtles alive?
in [Toyota]
|
From: Not Me General Obama is an on 1 Jul 2010 15:56 On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:45:08 -0600, ���hw��f <snuhwolf(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > BP is a criminal organisation that should be seized >by the government and have all its officers imprisoned. > >I'd suggest GITMO... > >^_^ Seizing foreign assets seems to come as easily to you as it did to Fidel in 1959. What other silly suggestions do you have should the British choose to retaliate and say for example seize FOMOCO's assets in the UK? Should the next move by Obama be to order carpet bombing of Buck House? How about sailing the Sixth Fleet up the Thames River to Parliament?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Jul 2010 17:49 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:22:43 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>It's not *ALL* Obungler's fault. But he was offered halp on the third >>>day and refused it. The oil might have never reached the shore if the >>>Ducth and Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in. >> >> That's complete bullshit. > > > Yeah, but it's the short story he heard on the radio or TV, and he's > sticking to it. Bullshit. Google it.
From: Lookout on 1 Jul 2010 19:54 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:49:19 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:22:43 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >>>>It's not *ALL* Obungler's fault. But he was offered halp on the third >>>>day and refused it. The oil might have never reached the shore if the >>>>Ducth and Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in. >>> >>> That's complete bullshit. >> >> >> Yeah, but it's the short story he heard on the radio or TV, and he's >> sticking to it. > >Bullshit. Google it. Prove "The oil might have never reached the shore if the Ducth and Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in." Go ahead. We'll wait. And wait... And wait.....
From: Not Me General Obama is an on 1 Jul 2010 21:01 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:54:28 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:49:19 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:22:43 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>>>>It's not *ALL* Obungler's fault. But he was offered halp on the third >>>>>day and refused it. The oil might have never reached the shore if the >>>>>Ducth and Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in. >>>> >>>> That's complete bullshit. >>> >>> >>> Yeah, but it's the short story he heard on the radio or TV, and he's >>> sticking to it. >> >>Bullshit. Google it. > >Prove "The oil might have never reached the shore if the Ducth and >Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in." Here you go. http://www.examiner.com/x-325-Global-Warming-Examiner~y2010m6d12-US-reconsiders-Dutch-offer-to-supply-oil-skimmers U.S. reconsiders Dutch offer to supply oil skimmers [ Please read the full article. Edited to strike down your challenge.] Excerpt: "The Dutch offered to fly their skimmer arm systems to the Gulf 3 days after the oil spill started. "As of June 8th, BP reported that they have collected 64,650 barrels of oil in the Gulf. That is only a fraction of the amount of oil spilled from the well. That is less than one day�s rated capacity of the Dutch oil skimmers. " "Using the Dutch skimmers should have prevented most of the oil from ever getting even close to shore. " ---- More reading material. An entire Google list of articles about the Dutch skimmers. http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=dutch+offered+skimmers+to+gulf&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CpgTaEDQtTL6JIJOapgTypKCGCwAAAKoEBU_Qws_w&fp=4b53d993194b88d >Go ahead. We'll wait. > >And wait... > >And wait..... Say the folks in Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida begging for help and instead having to deal with an incompetent Obama.
From: Lookout on 1 Jul 2010 22:17
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:01:37 -0400, Not Me General <Obama is an @ss.com> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:54:28 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:49:19 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:22:43 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>>>>It's not *ALL* Obungler's fault. But he was offered halp on the third >>>>>>day and refused it. The oil might have never reached the shore if the >>>>>>Ducth and Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in. >>>>> >>>>> That's complete bullshit. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, but it's the short story he heard on the radio or TV, and he's >>>> sticking to it. >>> >>>Bullshit. Google it. >> >>Prove "The oil might have never reached the shore if the Ducth and >>Norwegian skimmers had been allowed in." > >Here you go. >http://www.examiner.com/x-325-Global-Warming-Examiner~y2010m6d12-US-reconsiders-Dutch-offer-to-supply-oil-skimmers > >U.S. reconsiders Dutch offer to supply oil skimmers > >[ Please read the full article. Edited to strike down your challenge.] > >Excerpt: > >"The Dutch offered to fly their skimmer arm systems to the Gulf 3 days >after the oil spill started. > >"As of June 8th, BP reported that they have collected 64,650 barrels >of oil in the Gulf. That is only a fraction of the amount of oil >spilled from the well. That is less than one day�s rated capacity of >the Dutch oil skimmers. " > >"Using the Dutch skimmers should have prevented most of the oil from >ever getting even close to shore. " ---- That's an OPINION. Where's the proof? |