BP burning sea turtles alive?
in [Toyota]
|
From: Lookout on 1 Jul 2010 23:29 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:32:07 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:00:56 -0500, Lookout wrote: > >>>Considering they were held off by bureaucacy, it's a little hard. >>> >>>Maybe if they had been allowed on site from the start it would have made >>>a difference. >> >> "maybe" You're whining about this with no proof what so ever? What the >> hell is wrong with you? > >Plenty of proof. Can you use Google? Or is talking through your hat more >your style? SHOW me. Until you do I think you're lying. >>>We'll see. A skimmer with the ability to handle 1,000,000 gallons a day >>>just arrived in the Gulf. >> >> JUST arrived AFTER it was specifically retrofitted to do this type work. >> If WAS NOT AVAILIBLE earlier. > >Others were, and were turned away. Again, Google it before talking through >your hat. Prove how much of a difference they would have made. Why is that so hard to do if you're so sure of it?
From: Not Me General Obama is an on 2 Jul 2010 00:04 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:38:22 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:01:37 -0400, Not Me General wrote: > >> More reading material. >> An entire Google list of articles about the Dutch skimmers. >> http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=dutch+offered+skimmers+to+gulf&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CpgTaEDQtTL6JIJOapgTypKCGCwAAAKoEBU_Qws_w&fp=4b53d993194b88d >> >> >>>Go ahead. We'll wait. >>> >>>And wait... >>> >>>And wait..... >> >> Say the folks in Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida begging for >> help and instead having to deal with an incompetent Obama. > >Is this meathead for real, or just another dumb-as troll? > >I'm betting he's a for-real k00k. I won't take that bet my friend.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Jul 2010 00:08 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:27:19 -0500, Lookout wrote: >>> Indeed. Hachoo is being blockheaded here. That and he backpedals >>> furiously when it's pointed out that he is wrong. >> >>So, all that is set in stone? >> >>OK. So, looks like I'm right: Obama is an Empty Suit. > > Nope. Then why didn't his administration do something before now? The MMS gave the rig a clean bill of health.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Jul 2010 00:09 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:29:52 -0500, Lookout wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:32:07 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:00:56 -0500, Lookout wrote: >> >>>>Considering they were held off by bureaucacy, it's a little hard. >>>> >>>>Maybe if they had been allowed on site from the start it would have >>>>made a difference. >>> >>> "maybe" You're whining about this with no proof what so ever? What the >>> hell is wrong with you? >> >>Plenty of proof. Can you use Google? Or is talking through your hat more >>your style? > > SHOW me. Until you do I think you're lying. > >>>>We'll see. A skimmer with the ability to handle 1,000,000 gallons a day >>>>just arrived in the Gulf. >>> >>> JUST arrived AFTER it was specifically retrofitted to do this type >>> work. If WAS NOT AVAILIBLE earlier. >> >>Others were, and were turned away. Again, Google it before talking >>through your hat. > > Prove how much of a difference they would have made. Why is that so hard > to do if you're so sure of it? <YAWN> Bite me.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Jul 2010 00:10
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:31:40 -0500, Lookout wrote: >> >>Yeah, I know. But Bush was out of office for 12 months before this >>happened. > > And the well was dug WHILE bush was in office. It's HIS fault the proper > safeguards weren't in place. Hard to argue with logic like that. And yet, he does anyway. |