From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 5 Jul 2010 16:39 On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:34:09 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:54:09 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> Good catch. > > Liar. > > >> >> BTW, are you the nanny Ratzoo hired to keep track of things for him? > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as > expected from someone who lacks a logical argument. Oh. YOU'RE the nanny. > >> :) > > Classic erroneous presupposition.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 5 Jul 2010 22:55 On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:01:27 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> Oh. > > Classic pontification. > >> YOU'RE the nanny. > > Classic failure to comprehend the point. Classic bullshit.
From: pandora on 6 Jul 2010 13:42 On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:01:27 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> > wrote: > >> Oh. > > Classic pontification. > >> YOU'RE the nanny. > > Classic failure to comprehend the point. Always.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 6 Jul 2010 14:46 On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:42:49 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:01:27 -0500, Fred Hall wrote: > >> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >> wrote: >> >>> Oh. >> >> Classic pontification. >> >>> YOU'RE the nanny. >> >> Classic failure to comprehend the point. > > Always. "MEEEE TOOO!" Nothing new here.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 6 Jul 2010 14:49
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:46:18 -0500, pandora wrote: >> Actually at first he said what Olbermann SAID. When I challenged him to >> prove it he backtracked and changed to imply. He was lying from the very >> beginning. > > Indeed he did. Of course, maybe to him, the voices in his head told him > what others mean when they talk. That's called "thinking", something I'm sure you're quite unfamiliar with. You seem to indicate it with every post. |