From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:34:09 -0500, Fred Hall wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:54:09 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>
>> Good catch.
>
> Liar.
>
>
>>
>> BTW, are you the nanny Ratzoo hired to keep track of things for him?
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

Oh. YOU'RE the nanny.

>
>> :)
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:01:27 -0500, Fred Hall wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>
>> Oh.
>
> Classic pontification.
>
>> YOU'RE the nanny.
>
> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

Classic bullshit.


From: pandora on
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:01:27 -0500, Fred Hall wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
> wrote:
>
>> Oh.
>
> Classic pontification.
>
>> YOU'RE the nanny.
>
> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

Always.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:42:49 -0500, pandora wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:01:27 -0500, Fred Hall wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:39:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh.
>>
>> Classic pontification.
>>
>>> YOU'RE the nanny.
>>
>> Classic failure to comprehend the point.
>
> Always.

"MEEEE TOOO!"

Nothing new here.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:46:18 -0500, pandora wrote:

>> Actually at first he said what Olbermann SAID. When I challenged him to
>> prove it he backtracked and changed to imply. He was lying from the very
>> beginning.
>
> Indeed he did. Of course, maybe to him, the voices in his head told him
> what others mean when they talk.

That's called "thinking", something I'm sure you're quite unfamiliar with.
You seem to indicate it with every post.