From: Lookout on
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General <Obama is an
@ss.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act
>>
>>Off topic.
>
>That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot
>address. Fair enough.

Nope. Look at the subject line.
Dumbass.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:34:11 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:45:08 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:44:09 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>> news:aSOWn.8833$YX3.4705(a)newsfe18.iad...
>>>
>>>
>>>> The k00ks will come out of the woodwork now, for sure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You already have.
>>
>>See what I mean?
>>
>>
> You predicted you'd come out of the woodwork, then you did. Yeah, we see
> what you mean.

Nice to see you, too!


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act
>>
>>Off topic.
>
> That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot
> address. Fair enough.

Troll, perhaps?


From: Not Me General Obama is an on
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:22:33 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act
>>>
>>>Off topic.
>>
>> That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot
>> address. Fair enough.
>
>Troll, perhaps?

Could be. He's dumb enough.
From: Not Me General Obama is an on
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:37:22 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General <Obama is an
>@ss.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act
>>>
>>>Off topic.
>>
>>That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot
>>address. Fair enough.
>
>Nope. Look at the subject line.

I'd rather reread your first comment in the thread.

* No. That's all conservative lemmings need to develop and opinion.
That's why they listen to Lush Dumbo and Beck..so they DON'T have to
think. *

Off topic, dunderhead?

>Dumbass.

Yes, you're certain that as well.