From: Lookout on 30 Jun 2010 20:37 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General <Obama is an @ss.com> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> >wrote: > >>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act >> >>Off topic. > >That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot >address. Fair enough. Nope. Look at the subject line. Dumbass.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Jun 2010 21:03 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:34:11 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:45:08 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:44:09 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:aSOWn.8833$YX3.4705(a)newsfe18.iad... >>> >>> >>>> The k00ks will come out of the woodwork now, for sure. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> You already have. >> >>See what I mean? >> >> > You predicted you'd come out of the woodwork, then you did. Yeah, we see > what you mean. Nice to see you, too!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Jun 2010 21:22 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act >> >>Off topic. > > That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot > address. Fair enough. Troll, perhaps?
From: Not Me General Obama is an on 1 Jul 2010 00:56 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:22:33 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act >>> >>>Off topic. >> >> That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot >> address. Fair enough. > >Troll, perhaps? Could be. He's dumb enough.
From: Not Me General Obama is an on 1 Jul 2010 01:01
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:37:22 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:07:31 -0400, Not Me General <Obama is an >@ss.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:55:57 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> >>wrote: >> >>>> But also, why did Obama not waive the Jones Act >>> >>>Off topic. >> >>That seems to be your canned response for every comment you cannot >>address. Fair enough. > >Nope. Look at the subject line. I'd rather reread your first comment in the thread. * No. That's all conservative lemmings need to develop and opinion. That's why they listen to Lush Dumbo and Beck..so they DON'T have to think. * Off topic, dunderhead? >Dumbass. Yes, you're certain that as well. |