BP burning sea turtles alive?
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Jul 2010 22:32 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:00:56 -0500, Lookout wrote: >>Considering they were held off by bureaucacy, it's a little hard. >> >>Maybe if they had been allowed on site from the start it would have made >>a difference. > > "maybe" You're whining about this with no proof what so ever? What the > hell is wrong with you? Plenty of proof. Can you use Google? Or is talking through your hat more your style? >> >>We'll see. A skimmer with the ability to handle 1,000,000 gallons a day >>just arrived in the Gulf. > > JUST arrived AFTER it was specifically retrofitted to do this type work. > If WAS NOT AVAILIBLE earlier. Others were, and were turned away. Again, Google it before talking through your hat.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Jul 2010 22:35 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:18:58 -0500, Lookout wrote: >>This incident with the skimmers just shows the lack of leadership by the >>President and other government officials. Most people, certainly the >>local residents, recognized that the government systems to deal with the >>oil spill were inadequate. It took over 6 weeks for the government to >>allow the state of Louisiana to build sand berms to protect the marshes, >>after oil has already entered the marshes. Decisions need to be made, >>often without full information and sometimes conflicting rules and >>regulations. The oil well did not stop spilling oil as the government >>tried to study the problems and make recommendations. There was no one >>with the authority to make the fast decisions necessary to combat the >>spill. " > > There's no proof they would have made much of a difference in an OCEAN. LOL! So, let's not take the assistance, and make SURE they have no effect. What a loser.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Jul 2010 22:38 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:01:37 -0400, Not Me General wrote: > More reading material. > An entire Google list of articles about the Dutch skimmers. > http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=dutch+offered+skimmers+to+gulf&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CpgTaEDQtTL6JIJOapgTypKCGCwAAAKoEBU_Qws_w&fp=4b53d993194b88d > > >>Go ahead. We'll wait. >> >>And wait... >> >>And wait..... > > Say the folks in Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida begging for > help and instead having to deal with an incompetent Obama. Is this meathead for real, or just another dumb-as troll? I'm betting he's a for-real k00k.
From: Lookout on 1 Jul 2010 23:26 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:35:43 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:18:58 -0500, Lookout wrote: > >>>This incident with the skimmers just shows the lack of leadership by the >>>President and other government officials. Most people, certainly the >>>local residents, recognized that the government systems to deal with the >>>oil spill were inadequate. It took over 6 weeks for the government to >>>allow the state of Louisiana to build sand berms to protect the marshes, >>>after oil has already entered the marshes. Decisions need to be made, >>>often without full information and sometimes conflicting rules and >>>regulations. The oil well did not stop spilling oil as the government >>>tried to study the problems and make recommendations. There was no one >>>with the authority to make the fast decisions necessary to combat the >>>spill. " >> >> There's no proof they would have made much of a difference in an OCEAN. > >LOL! So, let's not take the assistance, and make SURE they have no effect. I said we should have taken the help. When are you going to get that through your thick head? You've yet to prove it would have made much of a difference. > >What a loser. Yes, you are. And a dumb one at that.
From: Lookout on 1 Jul 2010 23:26
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:38:05 -0500, Alchemist <someplace(a)terra.net> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:18:58 -0500, Lookout wrote: > >> There's no proof they would have made much of a difference in an OCEAN. > >Were you born that stupid or did you work on that? Yet you provided no proof. Until you do then the question is still up in the air. |