From: dsi1 on
On 3/5/2010 2:17 PM, Mark wrote:
>
> I said it a few weeks ago , I say it again.. Toyota should publish
> the source code for the throttle control on the Internet for public
> review. This is the only way to clear the software if there is no
> problem, and if there is a problem, some hot shot SW guy will find it.
>
> Mark

Personally, I think it's a problem with software and faulty inputs but I
guess you have to start somewhere. I don't think Toyota is going to make
public their software. Maybe all cars should be using all the same
operating software. How about Windows 3.0? :-)
From: dsi1 on
On 3/5/2010 2:28 PM, Al Falfa wrote:
>
>
> "dsi1" <dsi1(a)humuhumunukunukuapuapa.org> wrote in message
> news:hSfkn.3639$jt1.2086(a)newsfe01.iad...
>> On 3/5/2010 12:35 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote:
>>> "dsi1"<dsi1(a)humuhumunukunukuapuapa.org> wrote in message
>>> news:mufkn.69282$Ye4.2974(a)newsfe11.iad...
>>>> On 3/5/2010 11:57 AM, Jeff Strickland wrote:
>>>>> "dsi1"<dsi1(a)humuhumunukunukuapuapa.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:dpekn.4274$3D3.1562(a)newsfe19.iad...
>>>>>> On 3/5/2010 10:21 AM, Jeff Strickland wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When MSoft or Apple develope products that can kill me while you are
>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>> them, then we can discuss whether the codesets they use should be
>>>>>>> proprietary or not. Right now, automakers are producing products
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>> kill you if used the way they are intended, and they are hiding
>>>>>>> behind
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> idea that the data stored is their data or your data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Soon or later is the problem. It should be sooner rather than later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It will happen sooner than later so consider your wish granted.
>>>>>> There's
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> doubt in my mind that the government will mandate that all cars shall
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> this electronic monitoring using the rational that this product
>>>>>> can kill
>>>>>> you as justification. Just remember that you asked for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The truth is that soon, many consumer products will be recording our
>>>>>> behaviors and I don't much care for that. Even hearing aid are
>>>>>> recording
>>>>>> data these days. That's modern life for you. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not arguing that there should or should not be data. I'm
>>>>> arguing that
>>>>> if
>>>>> there IS data, it's mine not the automakers'.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not here to call for Big Brother to hide under the back seat of my
>>>>> car.
>>>>> I'm here to say that if there is a window to what my car is doing AND
>>>>> that
>>>>> window is already in my car, then I should be allowed to pry the
>>>>> window
>>>>> open
>>>>> to see through it. The window ought not be locked shut in the name of
>>>>> protecting the automaker. Indeed, if there is anybody in the equation
>>>>> that
>>>>> needs to be protected, it's you and I not the automaker.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My guess is that in most cases, this data will be used against the
>>>> driver
>>>> because, in most cases, it's driver error that causes most accidents
>>>> not a
>>>> malfunctioning of the car therefore, making this information available
>>>> will not be in the best interest of the consumer. Not to worry though -
>>>> you're get what you wish for soon enough.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Be that as it is, Toyota is buying off claimants because the data
>>> apparently
>>> shows that the car was at fault, not the claimant.
>>>
>>> TODAY, the data is proprietary, and Toyota is keeping the secret and
>>> settling out of court because if it faces the plaintiff, the data
>>> will show
>>> Toyota is culpable.
>>>
>>
>> I think it's likely that there is some electronic glitch causing
>> problems with their cars and that Toyota is completely in the dark
>> about how to solve this problem. When this all blows over, we'll be
>> able to give a proper analysis of the situation and in hindsight, what
>> Toyota should have done. Today I'm not going to worry about it. :-)
>
> I heard they plan to upgrade to Windows 7.

Not a minute too soon. My understanding is that MS Vista for Toyota has
a few problems. One of them being that you need at least a V6 to run it.
:-)
From: jim beam on
On 03/05/2010 07:18 AM, Tom Adams wrote:
> On Mar 4, 9:42�pm, john<johngd...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> That must be Toyota's way of taking the 5th!
>>
>> Before she died, the 5-foot-2, 125-pound woman told relatives she was
>> practically standing with both feet on the brake pedal but could not
>> stop the car from slamming into a building. Records confirm that
>> emergency personnel found Grossman with both feet on the brake pedal.
>>
>> Toyota has for years blocked access to data stored in devices similar
>> to airline "black boxes" that could explain crashes blamed on sudden
>> unintended acceleration, according to an Associated Press review of
>> lawsuits nationwide and interviews with auto crash experts.
>>
>> Full article at:http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AP-IMPACT-Toyota-secretive-on-apf-12944...
>
> Toyota's EDRs probably are lousy. The main reason for car makers
> putting in an EDR in the first place was for accident analysis to
> avoid liability and sort our fact from fiction. The fact that Toyota
> has had trouble doing this for the accelerator problem is evidence of
> lack of useful data in the EDR. Its not like Toyota can't read the
> black box in their own cars.

exactly.

--
nomina rutrum rutrum
From: jim beam on
On 03/05/2010 05:03 AM, C. E. White wrote:
> "john"<johngdole(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0dbebe1e-d08d-4e40-94b0-f3708655765e(a)c37g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>> That must be Toyota's way of taking the 5th!
>>
>> Before she died, the 5-foot-2, 125-pound woman told relatives she
>> was
>> practically standing with both feet on the brake pedal but could not
>> stop the car from slamming into a building. Records confirm that
>> emergency personnel found Grossman with both feet on the brake
>> pedal.
>>
>> Toyota has for years blocked access to data stored in devices
>> similar
>> to airline "black boxes" that could explain crashes blamed on sudden
>> unintended acceleration, according to an Associated Press review of
>> lawsuits nationwide and interviews with auto crash experts.
>>
>> Full article at:
>> http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AP-IMPACT-Toyota-secretive-on-apf-1294427692.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=1&asset=&ccode=
>
> Toyota has agreed to make the equipment needed to read the black box
> data available. From
> http://www.autoweek.com/article/20100225/CARNEWS/100229931 :
>
> "Reacting to criticism that data from black-box crash recorders in its
> vehicles can be accessed only by the company, Toyota Motor Corp. is
> moving to ship hundreds of data-decoding machines to the United States
> and make them commercially available to help diagnose vehicle
> problems."
>
> Ed
>
>

astroturfer ed trying to look like he's a concerned citizen.

--
nomina rutrum rutrum
From: jim beam on
On 03/05/2010 06:51 AM, C. E. White wrote:
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty"<elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-84E137.08334305032010(a)nothing.attdns.com...
>> In article
>> <4e08f574-e7ae-4f01-a649-30a0a6cf40ec(a)t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>,
>> ransley<Mark_Ransley(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Buy a Ford feed 10 US families, Buy a Toyota feed 10 Jap
>>> families.
>>
>> Buy a Ford feed 100 Mexican families, buy a Toyota and feed 10
>> American
>> families.
>
> Neither is true. And the fact is, despite assembling some cars in
> Mexico, Ford averages the highest domestic content of any company
> selling cars in the US.
>
> Let do a quick fact check...The Ford Hermosillo Mexico plant employs
> around 2,700 people (probably not all Mexican, but we will ignore
> that). The plant produces around 210,000 Fusion, Milans, and MKZ's a
> year. Do the math, it takes almost 80 cars to pay the salary of one
> worker for the year. So I guess you could say, buy a Ford Fusion, feed
> 0.0125 Mexican families for a year. Or buy a Ford Fusion and fedd a
> Mexican family for 4.6 days. Of course, at the same time you will also
> be feeding familes in the US, China, Japan, etc., etc.
>
> BTW, last time I checked, Mexico was consideredd part of North
> America. I think Mexicans and Canadians can be considered "Americans."
> Of course this brings up the question of what is really the correct
> term for residents of the United States of America so as to avoid
> being confused with residents o North, Central, and South America.
>
> The US Government has actively encouraged US companies to set up shop
> in Mexico. If you don't like the practice, you should write your
> Congress person.
>
> Ed
>
>

straight from detroit, right ed? you're not an astroturfer!

--
nomina rutrum rutrum