Prev: Generic automotive question concerning a 1992 Grand Caravan 4-speed
Next: Tail light bulbs
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 25 Nov 2009 13:37
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hejt5r$ah9$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:kKdPm.78365$Wf2.10370(a)newsfe23.iad...
>>>>
>>>> People who can't describe even one single issue should be mature enough
>>>> to not vote.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And you voted? Why?
>>
>>
>> Because I deserve to. I read. You, on the other hand, haven't set foot in
>> a library since elementary school.
>>
>
> You changed the subject again.
>

Nope.



> I thought a qualification to vote was the ability to describe an issue,
> which you never do.

I will NEVER waste time discussing issues with you because you use faith
instead of logic to understand the world.


> When asked why you voted, you say that the qualification is that one
> should read. I can run circles around you in discussing an issue, and you
> have no way to determine if I read or not.
>

Every single day, you prove that you do not read.



> You're a monkey f---ing a football.

Too much information. You and your wife's fantasies have no place in this
discussion.


From: Jeff Strickland on 25 Nov 2009 13:47

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:vPePm.78371$Wf2.77468(a)newsfe23.iad...
>

You have no place in this discussion.







From: JoeSpareBedroom on 25 Nov 2009 13:49
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:heju3m$j6l$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:vPePm.78371$Wf2.77468(a)newsfe23.iad...
>>
>
> You have no place in this discussion.


But you do. Notice the subject line. You're the organizer of the march, you
overgrown child.


From: SMS on 25 Nov 2009 15:12
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> You are correct - it's not a single point issue. I would expect any
> supporter of any candidate to be able to discuss just ONE "point"
> coherently. Their choice. Any single point. But I have higher expectations
> than you do.

The Republican party has found a version of Ronald Reagan that knows
even less, that is even more shallow, and that is even more dishonest.

Palin could very well win the 2012 Republican nomination. She simply has
to win the most votes in multi-candidate primaries. This would have been
unthinkable in the old Republican party, but so many moderates have
abandoned the Republican party and have become Democrats or Independents
(as a result of the neo-cons), that she could now easily win the nomination.

Fortunately, she could not do even as well as McCain did in the general
election. Many of McCain's voters voted for him in spite of Palin, but
there are still enough old-school Republicans that would not vote for
someone that is so unqualified and lacks the knowledge required to
perform the job.
From: ByTor on 25 Nov 2009 16:14
In article <tCdPm.78363$Wf2.41761(a)newsfe23.iad>,
newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>
> "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
> news:006ba016$0$16791$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> > In article <sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad>,
> > newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
> >>
> >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:hejl9f$qjf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >> >
> >> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
> >> >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
> >> >>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current
> >> >>>>> problem
> >> >>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The
> >> >>>>> question
> >> >>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
> >> >>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
> >> >>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
> >> >>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber
> >> >>> than
> >> >>> a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was
> >> >>> posed.
> >> >>> The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign
> >> >>> policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a
> >> >>> discussion
> >> >>> where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you
> >> >>> know.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the
> >> >>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he
> >> >>> takes a position that it'll never work.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
> >> >>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's
> >> >>> morotcycle
> >> >>> half way around a BB.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.
> >>
> >>
> >> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those
> >> people
> >> you would consider to be coherent.
> >
> > If the guy was not targeting something *particular* than he would have
> > been fair and actually showed people that had some knowledge. Not
> > everyone actually sits at home all day on the internet, watching the
> > news & reading newspapers all the time to be as well informed as *some*
> > people think they should be. It does not excuse basic knowledge but
> > again, this is typical gotcha bullshit, I wouldn't even call it
> > journalism. Why it becomes a weapon to *prove* points is beyond me.
>
>
> People who can't describe even one single issue should be mature enough to
> not vote.

I agree, but they still do, and I've met just as many uninformed voters
on the left as well so I call spades spades equally.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Generic automotive question concerning a 1992 Grand Caravan 4-speed
Next: Tail light bulbs