The March of Idiots
in [Toyota]
|
From: Jeff Strickland on 24 Nov 2009 20:42 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:MI%Om.39826$X01.2846(a)newsfe07.iad... > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7wQk > > Amazing. None of these people have any idea what they're talking about. > Amazingly, they ALL know that what Obama is doing is not working. "What would you do about foreign policy?" is a loaded question because foreign policy is not a single-point issue. Asking what anybody else might do is an even worse question because it requires the respondant to get into the head of somebody else and answer a question about an issue that is not a single-point issue. Maybe you should read the book.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 24 Nov 2009 20:47 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hei235$bkn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:MI%Om.39826$X01.2846(a)newsfe07.iad... >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7wQk >> >> Amazing. None of these people have any idea what they're talking about. >> > > Amazingly, they ALL know that what Obama is doing is not working. > > "What would you do about foreign policy?" is a loaded question because > foreign policy is not a single-point issue. Asking what anybody else might > do is an even worse question because it requires the respondant to get > into the head of somebody else and answer a question about an issue that > is not a single-point issue. You are correct - it's not a single point issue. I would expect any supporter of any candidate to be able to discuss just ONE "point" coherently. Their choice. Any single point. But I have higher expectations than you do.
From: Jeff Strickland on 24 Nov 2009 21:32 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:Q00Pm.39829$X01.13224(a)newsfe07.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hei235$bkn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:MI%Om.39826$X01.2846(a)newsfe07.iad... >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7wQk >>> >>> Amazing. None of these people have any idea what they're talking about. >>> >> >> Amazingly, they ALL know that what Obama is doing is not working. >> >> "What would you do about foreign policy?" is a loaded question because >> foreign policy is not a single-point issue. Asking what anybody else >> might do is an even worse question because it requires the respondant to >> get into the head of somebody else and answer a question about an issue >> that is not a single-point issue. > > > You are correct - it's not a single point issue. I would expect any > supporter of any candidate to be able to discuss just ONE "point" > coherently. Their choice. Any single point. But I have higher expectations > than you do. > But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the common man-on-the-street is asked. How can you possibly have higher expectations than I have, I live up to my expectations while you do not.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 25 Nov 2009 01:52 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hei50a$u2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:Q00Pm.39829$X01.13224(a)newsfe07.iad... >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:hei235$bkn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>> news:MI%Om.39826$X01.2846(a)newsfe07.iad... >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7wQk >>>> >>>> Amazing. None of these people have any idea what they're talking about. >>>> >>> >>> Amazingly, they ALL know that what Obama is doing is not working. >>> >>> "What would you do about foreign policy?" is a loaded question because >>> foreign policy is not a single-point issue. Asking what anybody else >>> might do is an even worse question because it requires the respondant to >>> get into the head of somebody else and answer a question about an issue >>> that is not a single-point issue. >> >> >> You are correct - it's not a single point issue. I would expect any >> supporter of any candidate to be able to discuss just ONE "point" >> coherently. Their choice. Any single point. But I have higher >> expectations than you do. >> > > But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in Iran?" > or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem is troop > levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question that was > asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no answer, or has a > million answers which is the same thing when the common man-on-the-street > is asked. You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
From: Jeff Strickland on 25 Nov 2009 11:04 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad... >> >> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in Iran?" >> or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem is troop >> levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question that was >> asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no answer, or has >> a million answers which is the same thing when the common >> man-on-the-street is asked. > > > You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's > pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept. > I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber than a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was posed. The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a discussion where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you know. Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he takes a position that it'll never work. If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's morotcycle half way around a BB.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Generic automotive question concerning a 1992 Grand Caravan 4-speed Next: Tail light bulbs |