From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
>>>
>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem
>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question
>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the common
>>> man-on-the-street is asked.
>>
>>
>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
>>
>
> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber than a
> rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was posed. The
> right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign policy
> issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a discussion where he
> would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you know.
>
> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the
> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he
> takes a position that it'll never work.
>
> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's morotcycle
> half way around a BB.


You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.


From: Jeff Strickland on

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
>>>>
>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem
>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question
>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
>>>
>>>
>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber than a
>> rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was posed. The
>> right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign policy
>> issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a discussion where
>> he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you know.
>>
>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the
>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he
>> takes a position that it'll never work.
>>
>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's morotcycle
>> half way around a BB.
>
>
> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.
>

I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.







From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hejl9f$qjf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
>>>>>
>>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
>>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem
>>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question
>>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
>>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
>>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
>>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber than
>>> a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was posed.
>>> The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign
>>> policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a discussion
>>> where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you
>>> know.
>>>
>>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the
>>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he
>>> takes a position that it'll never work.
>>>
>>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
>>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's morotcycle
>>> half way around a BB.
>>
>>
>> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.
>>
>
> I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.


Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those people
you would consider to be coherent.


From: Jeff Strickland on

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad...
>
>
> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those
> people you would consider to be coherent.
>

Compared to you, ALL OF THEM.









From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hejmrh$a3g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad...
>>
>>
>> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those
>> people you would consider to be coherent.
>>
>
> Compared to you, ALL OF THEM.


You're very lazy.