Prev: Generic automotive question concerning a 1992 Grand Caravan 4-speed
Next: Tail light bulbs
From: ByTor on 25 Nov 2009 11:53
In article <sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad>,
newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:hejl9f$qjf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >
> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> > news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
> >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >>>
> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
> >>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current problem
> >>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The question
> >>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
> >>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
> >>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
> >>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber than
> >>> a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was posed.
> >>> The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign
> >>> policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a discussion
> >>> where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you
> >>> know.
> >>>
> >>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the
> >>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he
> >>> takes a position that it'll never work.
> >>>
> >>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
> >>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's morotcycle
> >>> half way around a BB.
> >>
> >>
> >> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.
> >>
> >
> > I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.
>
>
> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those people
> you would consider to be coherent.

If the guy was not targeting something *particular* than he would have
been fair and actually showed people that had some knowledge. Not
everyone actually sits at home all day on the internet, watching the
news & reading newspapers all the time to be as well informed as *some*
people think they should be. It does not excuse basic knowledge but
again, this is typical gotcha bullshit, I wouldn't even call it
journalism. Why it becomes a weapon to *prove* points is beyond me.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 25 Nov 2009 12:15
"ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
news:006ba016$0$16791$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> In article <sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad>,
> newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>>
>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:hejl9f$qjf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> >
>> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> > news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
>> >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> >>>
>> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> >>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
>> >>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current
>> >>>>> problem
>> >>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The
>> >>>>> question
>> >>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
>> >>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
>> >>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
>> >>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber
>> >>> than
>> >>> a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was
>> >>> posed.
>> >>> The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign
>> >>> policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a
>> >>> discussion
>> >>> where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you
>> >>> know.
>> >>>
>> >>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from the
>> >>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where he
>> >>> takes a position that it'll never work.
>> >>>
>> >>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
>> >>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's
>> >>> morotcycle
>> >>> half way around a BB.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.
>>
>>
>> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those
>> people
>> you would consider to be coherent.
>
> If the guy was not targeting something *particular* than he would have
> been fair and actually showed people that had some knowledge. Not
> everyone actually sits at home all day on the internet, watching the
> news & reading newspapers all the time to be as well informed as *some*
> people think they should be. It does not excuse basic knowledge but
> again, this is typical gotcha bullshit, I wouldn't even call it
> journalism. Why it becomes a weapon to *prove* points is beyond me.


People who can't describe even one single issue should be mature enough to
not vote.


From: Jeff Strickland on 25 Nov 2009 12:17

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:tCdPm.78363$Wf2.41761(a)newsfe23.iad...
> "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
> news:006ba016$0$16791$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>> In article <sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad>,
>> newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>>>
>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hejl9f$qjf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> >
>>> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>> > news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
>>> >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> >> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>> >>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes in
>>> >>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current
>>> >>>>> problem
>>> >>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The
>>> >>>>> question
>>> >>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has no
>>> >>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
>>> >>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching. That's
>>> >>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber
>>> >>> than
>>> >>> a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was
>>> >>> posed.
>>> >>> The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which foreign
>>> >>> policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a
>>> >>> discussion
>>> >>> where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what you
>>> >>> know.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where
>>> >>> he
>>> >>> takes a position that it'll never work.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to nuclear
>>> >>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's
>>> >>> morotcycle
>>> >>> half way around a BB.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us, Jeff.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.
>>>
>>>
>>> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those
>>> people
>>> you would consider to be coherent.
>>
>> If the guy was not targeting something *particular* than he would have
>> been fair and actually showed people that had some knowledge. Not
>> everyone actually sits at home all day on the internet, watching the
>> news & reading newspapers all the time to be as well informed as *some*
>> people think they should be. It does not excuse basic knowledge but
>> again, this is typical gotcha bullshit, I wouldn't even call it
>> journalism. Why it becomes a weapon to *prove* points is beyond me.
>
>
> People who can't describe even one single issue should be mature enough to
> not vote.
>

And you voted? Why?






From: JoeSpareBedroom on 25 Nov 2009 12:23
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hejori$vpr$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:tCdPm.78363$Wf2.41761(a)newsfe23.iad...
>> "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
>> news:006ba016$0$16791$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>>> In article <sScPm.78356$Wf2.11477(a)newsfe23.iad>,
>>> newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>>>>
>>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:hejl9f$qjf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> >
>>>> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>>> > news:HCcPm.78352$Wf2.62222(a)newsfe23.iad...
>>>> >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> >> news:hejkji$k8n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>>> >>> news:4v4Pm.39843$X01.29402(a)newsfe07.iad...
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> But the question wasn't, "What would Sarah Palin do about nukes
>>>> >>>>> in
>>>> >>>>> Iran?" or any other specific foreign policy problem. A current
>>>> >>>>> problem
>>>> >>>>> is troop levels in Afghanistan, but that was not asked. The
>>>> >>>>> question
>>>> >>>>> that was asked, "what would Palin do about foreign policy?" has
>>>> >>>>> no
>>>> >>>>> answer, or has a million answers which is the same thing when the
>>>> >>>>> common man-on-the-street is asked.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> You are saying that Palin supporters need a bit of coaching.
>>>> >>>> That's
>>>> >>>> pathetic. But your parents were OK with the concept.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying is that you are dumber
>>>> >>> than
>>>> >>> a rock if you think there is an answer to the question as it was
>>>> >>> posed.
>>>> >>> The right answer from the man-on-the-street would be, "which
>>>> >>> foreign
>>>> >>> policy issue?" and then engage the stupid-f--- media guy in a
>>>> >>> discussion
>>>> >>> where he would be shown to know squat -- which is alot like what
>>>> >>> you
>>>> >>> know.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Once again, JoeShitForBrains has dragged a conversation away from
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >>> color of hte sky and turned it into a debate on aerodynamics where
>>>> >>> he
>>>> >>> takes a position that it'll never work.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If JoeShitForBrains brain was a pea and peas were the key to
>>>> >>> nuclear
>>>> >>> energy, his pea wouldn't be large enough to drive a pissant's
>>>> >>> morotcycle
>>>> >>> half way around a BB.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You are very angry today. What's really wrong? You can tell us,
>>>> >> Jeff.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm not angry. I'm right, again. And you're wrong. Again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Go watch the video again. Using time markers, tell me which of those
>>>> people
>>>> you would consider to be coherent.
>>>
>>> If the guy was not targeting something *particular* than he would have
>>> been fair and actually showed people that had some knowledge. Not
>>> everyone actually sits at home all day on the internet, watching the
>>> news & reading newspapers all the time to be as well informed as *some*
>>> people think they should be. It does not excuse basic knowledge but
>>> again, this is typical gotcha bullshit, I wouldn't even call it
>>> journalism. Why it becomes a weapon to *prove* points is beyond me.
>>
>>
>> People who can't describe even one single issue should be mature enough
>> to not vote.
>>
>
> And you voted? Why?


Because I deserve to. I read. You, on the other hand, haven't set foot in a
library since elementary school.


From: Jeff Strickland on 25 Nov 2009 13:31

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:kKdPm.78365$Wf2.10370(a)newsfe23.iad...
>>>
>>> People who can't describe even one single issue should be mature enough
>>> to not vote.
>>>
>>
>> And you voted? Why?
>
>
> Because I deserve to. I read. You, on the other hand, haven't set foot in
> a library since elementary school.
>

You changed the subject again.

I thought a qualification to vote was the ability to describe an issue,
which you never do. When asked why you voted, you say that the qualification
is that one should read. I can run circles around you in discussing an
issue, and you have no way to determine if I read or not.

The fact that you assert that you read, and that I can run circles around
you can only mean two things, I read or that it doesn't matter if I read
because whatever you read doesn't stick. Either way, by your definition you
ought not be voting.

You're a monkey f---ing a football.



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Generic automotive question concerning a 1992 Grand Caravan 4-speed
Next: Tail light bulbs