Teabaggers reject racism claims
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Obama Saves Gulf of Mexico
Next: Rip Van Tea Partyer
From: RD Sandman on 21 Jul 2010 11:13 =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in news:B7q1o.17172$Hw.14592(a)newsfe10.iad: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:06:56 -0500, RD Sandman wrote: > >>>> And he did. Ever wonder why Michael and Janet were never in the same >>>> picture together? Hmmmm, put a wig and falsies on Michael....... >>>> >>> >>> >>> So Michael Jackson isn't dead, he just made the final change to become >>> Janet on a 24/7 basis. >>> >>> >>> Why is Janet less "talented"? >> >> >> Depends on your definition of talent. She is by far better looking. > > I still have an impression of the nipple ring burned into my retinas... It tasted pretty good, too. -- Sleep well tonight, RD (The Sandman) The three stages of our economy....... Recession - You neighbor loses his job... Depression - You lose your job... Recovery - Obama loses his....
From: RD Sandman on 21 Jul 2010 11:16 Michael Ejercito <mejercit(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:f9397b30-34f0-4b9c-b92a-fc4c2da48972(a)k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > On Jul 20, 9:25�am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito >> >> >> >> <mejer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >On Jul 20, 4:24�am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:09:19 -0500, Liberal Hypocrite Detector >> >> >Um, no. >> >> >> >http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0185.shtml >> >> >George W. Bush's military service began in 1968 when he enlisted >> >> >in t > he >> >> >Texas Air National Guard after graduating with a bachelor's >> >> >degree in history from Yale University. The aircraft he was >> >> >ultimately trained > to fly >> >> >was the F-102 Delta Dagger, popularly known as "the Deuce." The >> >> >F-102 > may >> >> >have been old but was far from useless, and it continued to serve >> >> >in > large >> >> >numbers with both Air Force and Air National Guard units well >> >> >into th > e >> >> >1970s. Furthermore, the F-102 was deployed to Vietnam throughout >> >> >most > of >> >> >the conflict, and the aircraft proved its value early by >> >> >deterring No > rth >> >> >Vietnamese pilots from crossing the border to attack the South. >> >> >Perha > ps >> >> >more importantly, the F-102 and its Air National Guard pilots >> >> >perform > ed a >> >> >vital role in defending the continental United States from >> >> >nuclear at > tack. >> >> >> >http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-102a-ops >> >> >.ht > m >> >> >Four F-102s were sent from Clark AB, P. I., to South Vietnam in >> >> >March > 1962, >> >> >after radars had detected low flying, unidentified aircraft along >> >> >the Cambodian border. This started a series of rotations every 6 >> >> >weeks by > Navy � >> >> >EA-1F all weather fighters and USAF F-102s to Tan Son Nhut. The >> >> >rotat > ion >> >> >ended in May 1963 due to base overcrowding. Nonetheless, from the >> >> >sum > mer of >> >> >1963 to mid 1964, Thirteenth Air Force conducted no-notice >> >> >deployment > s of >> >> >F-102s to South Vietnam and brief training flights to Tan Son >> >> >Nhut an > d Da >> >> >Nang. The small number of aircraft �committed to SEA air defense >> >> >be > fore >> >> >1965 tripled by the end of 1966. At that time 12 F-102s stood >> >> >alert i > n >> >> >South Vietnam (6 at Bien Hoa and 6 at Da Nang) and another 10 in >> >> >Thai > land >> >> >(6 at Udorn and 4 at Don Muang). Little change occurred in 1967 >> >> >and 1 > 968, >> >> >the Air Force keeping a minimum of 14 F-102s on 5 minute alert >> >> >with t > he >> >> >remainder of the force on 1 hour call. F-102 operations �in SEA >> >> >end > ed in >> >> >December 1969 (The last F-102 squadron at Clark was inactivated. >> >> >Howe > ver, a >> >> >few F-102s remained at the Royal Thai Air Base of Don Muang until >> >> >the summer of 1970.) with a remarkable safety record. In almost >> >> >10 years > of >> >> >flying air defense and a few combat air patrols for SAC B-52s, >> >> >just 1 > 5 F- >> >> >102s were lost. >> >> >> His unit was at 100% when he was allowed to join. That's been >> >> documented repeatedly. >> > � Documented repeatedly by WHOM? >> >> During the election. > The 1968 election? > >> >> >> >> >> There were NO NEW F-102 units be sent to Viet Nam WHEN HE JOINED. >> >> Therefore HE COULD NOT GO and his daddy knew that. The only one >> >> flying them were AD Air Force. >> >> > � And there was some sort of guarantee that it would not change in >> >the future? >> >> Yes. It was OBSOLETE for combat in View Nam. > And when was it declared obsolete? Sometime in the late 60s and early 70s. It was very viable for what it got used for and that was never a design criteria. It was designed and built to be an interceptor, not a rocket platform. -- Sleep well tonight, RD (The Sandman) The three stages of our economy....... Recession - You neighbor loses his job... Depression - You lose your job... Recovery - Obama loses his....
From: RD Sandman on 21 Jul 2010 11:17 Tankfixer <paul.carrier(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.26aff2a77d415f89896f7(a)news.eternal-september.org: > In article <c6b90a2f-b795-4d0f-9bd3- > c7ed56cad83c(a)c36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mejercit(a)hotmail.com > says... >> >> On Jul 19, 7:22�pm, Tankfixer <paul.carr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > In article <6s6946dv0hdovta6h17fsvppqbddlfd...(a)4ax.com>, >> > mrLook...(a)yahoo.com says... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:14:12 -0500, Liberal Hypocrite Detector >> > > <grey_ghost471-newsgro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > >> > > >Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >> > > >news:4ev8465mv0ufra0jg9t6ic27hnrle8j7cb(a)4ax.com: >> > >> > > >> He avoided serving and then claimed he could have gone. That >> > > >> was a lie. >> > >> > > >Only if avoidance means joining the Texas Air National guard, >> > > >learning to fly a Mach plus interceptor and then standing >> > > >alerts. >> > >> > > No. Only if it means getting in a unit that was already at 100% >> > > capacity...which was ILLEGAL. And getting into a unit that flew >> > > jets that were no longer used in Viet Nam SO HE COULDN'T GO. He >> > > claimed he wanted to..then why join a unit that can't be >> > > deployed? >> > >> > Feel free to cite the law or regulation that makes it illegal to >> > enlist over 100% in a unit. >> And who defines the capacity of a unit? > > The unit MTOE guides the authorized strength. > > I've enlisted and transfered soldiers into units that were already at > their authorized strengths. Yep. The units I was in were flexible in their strength. It varied by the number of ACs that needed pilots, maintenance crews and support staff. -- Sleep well tonight, RD (The Sandman) The three stages of our economy....... Recession - You neighbor loses his job... Depression - You lose your job... Recovery - Obama loses his....
From: Michael Ejercito on 21 Jul 2010 12:37 On Jul 20, 6:21 pm, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:11:45 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito > > > > <mejer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On Jul 20, 9:25 am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito > > >> <mejer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Jul 20, 4:24 am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > And there was some sort of guarantee that it would not change in > >> >the future? > > >> Yes. It was OBSOLETE for combat in View Nam. > > And when was it declared obsolete? > > The jet wasn't. They stopped sending NG units that flew it BEFORE > little georgie joined. His daddy knew that and that's why he ARRANGED > for him to join. > And what was to stop them from sending MORE NG units that flew it AFTER "littel georgie" joined? Michael
From: CharlesGrozny on 21 Jul 2010 13:36
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman(a)comcast[remove].net> wrote in message news:Xns9DBC5469A744Chopewell(a)216.196.97.130... > Tankfixer <paul.carrier(a)gmail.com> wrote in > news:MPG.26aff2a77d415f89896f7(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> In article <c6b90a2f-b795-4d0f-9bd3- >> c7ed56cad83c(a)c36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mejercit(a)hotmail.com >> says... >>> >>> On Jul 19, 7:22 pm, Tankfixer <paul.carr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> > In article <6s6946dv0hdovta6h17fsvppqbddlfd...(a)4ax.com>, >>> > mrLook...(a)yahoo.com says... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:14:12 -0500, Liberal Hypocrite Detector >>> > > <grey_ghost471-newsgro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > >Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in >>> > > >news:4ev8465mv0ufra0jg9t6ic27hnrle8j7cb(a)4ax.com: >>> > >>> > > >> He avoided serving and then claimed he could have gone. That >>> > > >> was a lie. >>> > >>> > > >Only if avoidance means joining the Texas Air National guard, >>> > > >learning to fly a Mach plus interceptor and then standing >>> > > >alerts. >>> > >>> > > No. Only if it means getting in a unit that was already at 100% >>> > > capacity...which was ILLEGAL. And getting into a unit that flew >>> > > jets that were no longer used in Viet Nam SO HE COULDN'T GO. He >>> > > claimed he wanted to..then why join a unit that can't be >>> > > deployed? >>> > >>> > Feel free to cite the law or regulation that makes it illegal to >>> > enlist over 100% in a unit. >>> And who defines the capacity of a unit? >> >> The unit MTOE guides the authorized strength. >> >> I've enlisted and transfered soldiers into units that were already at >> their authorized strengths. > > Yep. The units I was in were flexible in their strength. It varied by > the number of ACs that needed pilots, maintenance crews and support > staff. > > -- > Sleep well tonight, > > RD (The Sandman) > > The three stages of our economy....... > > Recession - You neighbor loses his job... > > Depression - You lose your job... > > Recovery - Obama loses his.... Sigh, Liberalism IS a mental disease. They're still bitching about W when the problem is Nobama now. Of course, they were bitching about "Ronny Raygun" for the longest time, too. Focus on the current problem not one that basically doesn't exist anymore. Charles Grozny Obama defined by 3 bible verses. Jesus nails his character John 8:44 Elijah nails what he's doing 1 Kings 21:20 God defines his final destiny Rev 19:20 |