{BS} I am fearful...
in [Toyota]
|
From: tak on 14 Dec 2009 10:34 "Hachiroku" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:hg5jiv$pkb$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:49:35 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote: > >> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:49:44 -0500, dr_jeff <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote: >> >>>Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: >>>> >>>>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>>>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>>> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news? > pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=home> >>>>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >>>> >>>> Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any >>>> form of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons. >>> >>>You have shown no ability to think for yourself, gather information or >>>make conclusions based on evidence. >>> >>>You're not worth my time. >>> >>>BYE BYE >> >> ROFLMAO >> >> Liberals can't stand up and fight. > > This is ridiculous. He keeps trying to indoctrinate me that it's all Our > fault, and ignores the evidence presented to him that it all happened > many times before now. > > Unbelievable. > Incredible!
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 14 Dec 2009 14:01 "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message news:1p6dnamjXp6GF7vWnZ2dnUVZ_o1i4p2d(a)giganews.com... > In article <p2qVm.91059$Wf2.85394(a)newsfe23.iad>, > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: > >> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >> news:1vOdnbTX6tr7kLvWnZ2dnUVZ_tVi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> > In article <LzgVm.50668$cX4.26994(a)newsfe10.iad>, >> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: >> > >> >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> >> news:pan.2009.12.13.21.39.02.198635(a)e86.GTS... >> >> > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:22:44 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Dec 13, 4:03 pm, "Sharx35" <shar...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> "dr_jeff" <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >> >> >>> >> >> >>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&ref >> >> >>> > e.. >> >> >>> > .> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >> >> >> >> >> >> We just need to put solar panels on every roof that can support >> >> >> them, >> >> >> install reversible electric meters and see what happens. I know >> >> >> Germany >> >> >> is doing this. Let's take some military-industrial complex money >> >> >> and >> >> >> redirect it to this project. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > You were doing fine until "military-industrial". Really need to get >> >> > off >> >> > moveon.org talking points... >> >> >> >> >> >> We were first warned about the influence of the military-industrial >> >> complex >> >> by a Republican president. Sadly, you cannot learn more about this on >> >> television unless you get very lucky and stumble across a documentary >> >> about >> >> this particular president. >> >> >> >> He was right, by the way, and it has absolutely nothing to do with >> >> moveon.org or any other liberal organization whose influence you've >> >> been >> >> ordered to worry about. >> > >> > You lefties keep pissing into the wind. LOL!! >> >> >> The Republican president I mentioned was a "lefty"? > > Did I mention anybody besides you?? No. Since everything I said was correct, your responses make absolutely no sense. Business as usual, in other words.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Dec 2009 15:35 On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:34:43 -0500, tak wrote: > > "Hachiroku" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:hg5jiv$pkb$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:49:35 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:49:44 -0500, dr_jeff <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote: >>> >>>>Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>>>>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>>>> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news? >> pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=home> >>>>>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >>>>> >>>>> Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any >>>>> form of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons. >>>> >>>>You have shown no ability to think for yourself, gather information or >>>>make conclusions based on evidence. >>>> >>>>You're not worth my time. >>>> >>>>BYE BYE >>> >>> ROFLMAO >>> >>> Liberals can't stand up and fight. >> >> This is ridiculous. He keeps trying to indoctrinate me that it's all Our >> fault, and ignores the evidence presented to him that it all happened >> many times before now. >> >> Unbelievable. >> > Incredible! Absolutely. I'm still waiting for someone to tell what caused the last five climate change cycles, before Man had an impact, if any.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Dec 2009 17:04 On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:57:48 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:01:39 -0600, dbu'' <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> > wrote: > >>In article <lekbi5tt7uup9pv8ubdvgnbmob1a4hkri8(a)4ax.com>, >> Scott in Florida <MoveOn(a)outa.here> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:49:44 -0500, dr_jeff <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>> >>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>> >>>> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=h >>> >>>> ome> >>> >>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >>> >> >>> >> Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any >>> >> form of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons. >>> > >>> >You have shown no ability to think for yourself, gather information or >>> >make conclusions based on evidence. >>> > >>> >You're not worth my time. >>> > >>> >BYE BYE >>> >>> ROFLMAO >>> >>> Liberals can't stand up and fight. >> >>Don't worry, jeffy will be back as soon as he finds another wi-fi hot >>spot, maybe at a Starbucks coffee shop or something. > > Starbucks coffee sucks.... It doesn't suck... But it sure ain't worth $4 a cup!
From: tak on 14 Dec 2009 18:36
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.12.14.20.35.21.361641(a)e86.GTS... > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:34:43 -0500, tak wrote: > >> >> "Hachiroku" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:hg5jiv$pkb$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:49:35 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:49:44 -0500, dr_jeff <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>>>>> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news? >>> pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=home> >>>>>>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any >>>>>> form of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons. >>>>> >>>>>You have shown no ability to think for yourself, gather information or >>>>>make conclusions based on evidence. >>>>> >>>>>You're not worth my time. >>>>> >>>>>BYE BYE >>>> >>>> ROFLMAO >>>> >>>> Liberals can't stand up and fight. >>> >>> This is ridiculous. He keeps trying to indoctrinate me that it's all Our >>> fault, and ignores the evidence presented to him that it all happened >>> many times before now. >>> >>> Unbelievable. >>> >> Incredible! > > Absolutely. I'm still waiting for someone to tell what caused the last > five climate change cycles, before Man had an impact, if any. > no, not that |