From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Dec 2009 16:38 On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: > > "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message > news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >> >> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=home> > > Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any form of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Dec 2009 16:39 On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:22:44 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Dec 13, 4:03 pm, "Sharx35" <shar...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> "dr_jeff" <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >> >> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> >> > Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >> >> > <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refe...> >> >> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. > > We just need to put solar panels on every roof that can support them, > install reversible electric meters and see what happens. I know Germany > is doing this. Let's take some military-industrial complex money and > redirect it to this project. You were doing fine until "military-industrial". Really need to get off moveon.org talking points...
From: dr_jeff on 13 Dec 2009 16:49 Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: > >> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>> >>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=home> >> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. > > Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any form > of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons. You have shown no ability to think for yourself, gather information or make conclusions based on evidence. You're not worth my time. BYE BYE
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Dec 2009 18:18 On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:49:44 -0500, dr_jeff wrote: > Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:35 +0000, Sharx35 wrote: >> >>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>> Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>>> >>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refer=home> >>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >> >> Plenty around here. They don't want anything that even resembles any >> form of progress. Even if it means cleaner power. Morons. > > You have shown no ability to think for yourself, gather information or > make conclusions based on evidence. > > You're not worth my time. > > BYE BYE I have shown plenty of evidence to think for myself. It just doesn't jive with what you've been told to think. Like you say, when you get a clue, let us know. BTW, nobody told me where to find the Vlostok ice core sample chart. I found that all by myself. I can make my own arguements without having to have Al Gore or anybody else stand behind me. And the first time I linked to that chart ~2 years ago was on the IPCC's web site. It is no longer to be found there. Why do you suppose that is, Jeffy?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 13 Dec 2009 20:31
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.12.13.21.39.02.198635(a)e86.GTS... > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:22:44 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 4:03 pm, "Sharx35" <shar...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> "dr_jeff" <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>> >>> news:H4-dnZtQ8bdN0rjWnZ2dnUVZ_rxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>> >>> > Here's an example of a Democrat who does encourage wind power: >>> >>> > <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3IssawSnqcQ&refe...> >>> >>> Lots of wind and hot air in DEMONrat districts. >> >> We just need to put solar panels on every roof that can support them, >> install reversible electric meters and see what happens. I know Germany >> is doing this. Let's take some military-industrial complex money and >> redirect it to this project. > > > You were doing fine until "military-industrial". Really need to get off > moveon.org talking points... We were first warned about the influence of the military-industrial complex by a Republican president. Sadly, you cannot learn more about this on television unless you get very lucky and stumble across a documentary about this particular president. He was right, by the way, and it has absolutely nothing to do with moveon.org or any other liberal organization whose influence you've been ordered to worry about. |