The Drive-a-Toyota Act
in [Toyota]
|
From: Mike Hunter on 6 Jul 2007 17:54 So do I when I'm wrong. First one must show me where I'm wrong. During my sixty some odd years working in the auto business as a design engineer, a Group Sales Manager and the owner of a large multi-state service business I have accrued a vast knowledge in all facets of the business Simply because you do not know something that someone else does, or can not find the information someone has, does not make the other person wrong and you right so you can call them names as you so often tend do in the NGs. Yet if someone tried to point out your misunderstanding of the subject you chose to comment on, or calls you a name in return, because you do not know as much as you think you do, you get all bent our of shape. If someone tells me something about something of which I am not aware or have limited knowledge, I try to learn from that information. I do not start and argument with them just to be heard on the subject. mike "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Dfyji.597$MV6.530(a)trnddc01... > Mike Hunter wrote: >> IF a computer dummy like me can, surly an expert searcher like you should >> be able to find it. ;) >> >> mike > > Why do you have to behave like this? > > Why not act like an intelligent human being, and just tell us the URL? > > You acted like this when you claimed that the first digit of the VIN meant > something about the content, too. > > You don't need to act like a spoiled brat or a know-it-all or whatever. > > When I learn I am wrong, I admit it, as I did when I learned that Ford did > indeed start with Volvo's technology. > > Jeff > >> >> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:b4xji.33$z64.28(a)trnddc07... >>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>> Based on that you assume it does not exits, naturally LOL >>> No, I did not assume it does not exist. I looked for it on the IRS site >>> and I looked for it on Google. >>> >>> I didn't find it. I have no evidence that such a list exists. >>> >>> Now, if you wish to back your claim, please do so. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>>> mike >>>> >>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:0iwji.30$Y_3.21(a)trnddc04... >>>>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>>>> That may be your opinion, but if you think you are correct you had >>>>>> better notify the IRS. There is no listing of any Toyota holding >>>>>> company paying any corporate taxes, on the IRS wed site. LOL >>>>> Can you please tell us the location of the IRS website that lists >>>>> which companies pay taxes? >>>>> >>>>> I haven't found one that lists the taxes that corporations pay or even >>>>> one the lists all the corporate tax payers. >>>>> >>>>> JEff >>>>> >>>>>> mike >>>>>> >>>>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:afeji.8274$7k7.1410(a)trnddc01... >>>>>>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>>>>>> Those if favor of "tax" assistance do not think of the fact they >>>>>>>> are the ones paying the tax money that is used to "assist," and >>>>>>>> that is going to a foreign corporation that pays NO US federal >>>>>>>> corporate income taxes ;) >>>>>>> But it's US subsidies do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeff >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mike >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <dold(a)12.usenet.us.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:f6gclb$dij$3(a)blue.rahul.net... >>>>>>>>> In alt.autos.ford Bill Putney <bptn(a)kinez.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> You can subtract the $787.50 from the savings because *somenone* >>>>>>>>>> (the >>>>>>>>>> taxapyer) pays for that. Only if you are a liberal do you ignore >>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>> costs. >>>>>>>>> Only if there were no hybrids. I would like to thank you for >>>>>>>>> paying your >>>>>>>>> portion of my rebate, but the source of it doesn't affect the fit >>>>>>>>> in my >>>>>>>>> pocket. I think of it along the same lines as the development >>>>>>>>> cost for >>>>>>>>> Velcro, also funded by the taxpayer. >>
From: DH on 6 Jul 2007 17:58 "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)mailcity.com> wrote in message news:MsmdnQDDbdC2JxPbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d(a)ptd.net... [snip] > If someone tells me something about something of which I am not aware or > have limited knowledge, I try to learn from that information. I do not > start and argument with them just to be heard on the subject. > > mike Who are you and what have you done with the real "mike hunter?" -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Mike Hunter on 6 Jul 2007 18:01 Your assumption one does not get as much money for their vehicle on a trade through is not correct. One get whatever they can for their car but if one simply sell it and one does not take advantage of a trade through they will pay more in fees and taxes. On a $15,000 trade difference that can be a hefty extra cost for the seller to bear. mike "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%byji.37$Y_3.31(a)trnddc04... > Mike Hunter wrote: >> Then please show us you know what a trade through means. you response >> indicated you do not understand, if you can explain I will take it back >> ;) >> >> mike > > Mike, this isn't a competition. > > If you want to explain that you only pay the taxes on the difference > between the cost of the new vehicle and what you get on the old vehicle, > go ahead. > > If not, don't. > > I don't care. > > Jeff > >> >> >> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:B%wji.31$z64.12(a)trnddc07... >>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>> You think that because you do not know what at 'trade through' >>>> involves, dummy. LOL >>>> >>>> mike >>> Isn't that special, Mike? >>> >>> What is sad is that you have to call people names. >>> >>> Jeff >>
From: Mike Hunter on 6 Jul 2007 18:06 What could go wrong? It was simply a three speed manual tranny with a fluid clutch. Later models added a two speed electric gear shifter. ;) mike "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote in message news:elmop-195D2C.18025406072007(a)nntp1.usenetserver.com... > In article <Pp7TT5WKBvRn-pn2-pJ6YG8Ypxzdj(a)localhost>, > <CountFloyd(a)MonsterChillerHorrorTheater.com> wrote: > >> > I put the traditional CVT on par with the traditional fluid drive >> > automatic transmission with respect to complexity and number of failure >> > points, as well as its proclivity to fail. >> Don't mention "Fluid Drive" as prone to failure. My 1940 Chrysler has >> it and it is bulletproof! That was perhaps the best transmission >> produced. > > One single datum point does not prove anything. > > Modern fluid drive automatic transmissions, especially from the likes of > Chrysler, are junk waiting to burst into pieces at any moment. > > Even Honda can't get them right. >
From: Bill Putney on 6 Jul 2007 18:09
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: > In article <5f6jr5F3b8edjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > Bill Putney <bptn(a)kinez.net> wrote: > > >>www.thomasdistriuting has some good technical info. on batteries > > > http://www.thomas-distributing.com/index.htm Oops - yes - thanks. Got in a hurry just before going to work. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with the letter 'x') |