From: Bob Cooper on
In article <mJqdncSZnqMmhy3WnZ2dnUVZ_tgAAAAA(a)speakeasy.net>,
me(a)privacy.net says...
>
> On 03/28/2010 07:20 PM, Bob Cooper wrote:
> > In article<jOWdnfKCEJsuYTLWnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>,
> > n5hsr(a)sprynet.com says...
> >>
> >> "hls"<hls(a)nospam.nix> wrote in message
> >> news:0uudncQpRJf3bzLWnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> >>>
> >>> "C. E. White"<cewhite3remove(a)mindspring.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:G96dnVfJfLXoWTLWnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com...
> >>>> http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/403/nummi
> >>>>
> >>>> I listened to this yesterday. Very pro-Toyota and anti-GM. Completely one
> >>>> sided since the only GM people they interviewed were connected to NUMI.
> >>>> Most seemed bitter. I think they greatly over simplified the story in
> >>>> order to praise Toyota. It really made the UAW look bad. Typical NPR
> >>>> stuff., but still it was interesting.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> When I first read about NUMMI, it seemed that Toyota got into this
> >>> thing as an accomodation to GM. When GM folded, there was no
> >>> reason to continue, this most expensive manufacturing site in America.
> >>>
> >>> I could be wrong. If GM had no alternative, then neither did Toyota.
> >>
> >> I had hoped that GM would learn why Toyota was able to sell its Corolla from
> >> NUMMI (I'm driving one) for $1000 or so more than the Geo Prism that came
> >> down the same line and was worked on by the same workers. They didn't.
> >>
> >> Charles Grozny
> >
> > A relative has had a Prism for many years. Good car.
> > I had hoped that consumers would learn not to pay $1000 more for the
> > Corolla. They didn't.
> > Resale is better for the Toyota if sold still young.
> > But when you get north of 100k miles it starts turning into a net loser
> > on that score.
>
> eh? how do you figure that? year for year, any year, what is the
> resale value of the prism vs the corolla?

You can run numbers on kbb.com.
Believe the numbers or not. But many private buyers/sellers use kbb to
set the starting bargaining price for a used car.
Bottom line is once a car is +10 years old and +100k miles the kbb
resale value difference for Corollas and Prizms begins to merge,
going below the $1000 initial Corolla premium mentioned.
So if you intend to drive your car beyond those years/miles The Corolla
offers no advantage. Unless you just need the Corolla label for
personal reasons.
Buying a 5 year old Corolla instead of a Prizm was always a sucker play.
And according to my relative she saved close to $2000 buying the Prizm
over the Corolla when she bought it new. But I don't know the truth,
what rebates, etc were offered.
People often lie about cars, even relatives.
I do know it's a '95 Geo Prizm and last time I drove it it had about
150k miles and ran and drove well. She takes it to a Toyota dealer for
maintenance.

From: dr_jeff on
primemover wrote:
> On Mar 28, 1:04 pm, "C. E. White" <cewhite3rem...(a)mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>> http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/403/nummi
>>
>> I listened to this yesterday. Very pro-Toyota and anti-GM. Completely one
>> sided since the only GM people they interviewed were connected to NUMI. Most
>> seemed bitter. I think they greatly over simplified the story in order to
>> praise Toyota. It really made the UAW look bad. Typical NPR stuff., but
>> still it was interesting.
>
> Those of you who buy into this coverage being "pro-Toyota" and "anti-
> GM" are delusional and have you head in the sand. Listen to it again
> without you instinctual bias flaming and you will realize the story
> stands on its own and is a fine and objective piece of journalism.

It's a very good piece of journalism. I find it different in that the
style of the show is different than other "This American Life" Episodes.

I think its objectivity is limited. The story that it tells is the story
of the people who worked for NUMMI, GM and Toyota (at NUMMI and other
facilities in the US and Japan). To me, I don't think that the show was
about being anti-GM or pro-Toyota, but rather, just to tell the stories
of the people.

Jeff

> Your attitude undermines the US economy as we lose the new jobs battle
> to China and the other economies for true green technology developing
> now.
From: edspyhill01 on
On Mar 28, 9:51 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
> > On 03/28/2010 02:04 PM, C. E. White wrote:
> >>http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/403/nummi
>
<SNIP>
> The alternative is to let poor people in China stay poor.
>
> JEff
<SNIP>

I'm ok with that. As the Americans are layed off at my company more
H1B's from India take their place. I guess to Britain India is the
good colony, America is the bad colony.
From: C. E. White on

"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
news:gNGdnWaoWr-LvC3WnZ2dnUVZ_ruvnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net...

> gm's manufacturing facilities in germany are considerably more
> expensive than any they operate here. more expensive labor [MUCH
> more powerful unions], components, logistics, etc. yet gm are able
> to make a profit on those operations. odd how they say they're
> unable to do so here.

Are you sure about that? I keep reading how much money Opel has been
losing...

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/gm-opel%5Cs-threatened-lossjobs-strains-eu-principles/377554/

From
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100325/ANE/100329938 :

"GM is seeking 1.8 billion euros ($2.4 billion) in loans or loan
guarantees from countries with Opel/Vauxhall plants towards the cost
of a 3.7 billion euro restructuring to return the money-losing unit to
profit in 2012.

"So far the UK has pledged 300 million euros. Spain and Poland are
still considering GM's request.

"GM is seeking about 1 billion euros from Germany where Opel and half
of GM's European workforce are based.

"The U.S. automaker said earlier this month it would provide 1.9
billion euros in equity and loans to Opel, tripling its funding and
cutting its request for state aid in a bid to win over European
governments.

"Opel plans to cut 8,300 jobs in factories across Europe, shutter a
factory in Antwerp, Belgium and reduce production capacity by 20
percent."


Ed


From: C. E. White on

"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Fo-dnVpSIp1PdjLWnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net...
> On 03/28/2010 02:04 PM, C. E. White wrote:
>> http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/403/nummi
>>
>> I listened to this yesterday. Very pro-Toyota and anti-GM.
>> Completely
>> one sided since the only GM people they interviewed were connected
>> to
>> NUMI. Most seemed bitter. I think they greatly over simplified the
>> story
>> in order to praise Toyota. It really made the UAW look bad. Typical
>> NPR
>> stuff., but still it was interesting.
>>
>>
>
> did they mention the fact that g.m. exports its jobs to, and imports
> componentry from china? or did they simply point out that toyota
> creates american jobs and buys their componentry from american
> manufacturers?

As I have pointed out to you several times, if your goal is to buy the
products with the most domestic content, then GM is who you would buy
from.



Toyota also build vehicles and components in China, just like GM, only
more so.



You are an uber-hypocrite - protecting a foreign manufacturer while
trashing GM by complaining that they are buying some components from
China. If you want to be a free-trade advocate and say we should turn
the US car industry over to the Japanese because they are better at
it, then I can understand that point. What I can't understand is this
idea that you think it is OK to turn the US car industry over to
Toyota while blasting GM for doing exactly the same sorts of things
that Toyota does.


> i doubt they said that japan is an ally and that china is not. or
> that american taxpayer support of companies that export their
> business and jobs to a country that completely disrespects human
> rights, democracy or intellectual property is nothing short of
> fraud.

You should read about how Toyota treats "guest workers" or how they
exploit labor in places like Thailand. Toyota has a long history of
oppressing workers outside of the "home" factories. Toyota loves to
show you pictures of the shiny main assembly palnts in US and Japan.
They never show you pictures of the sweat shops they operate through
subsiduaries. GM just wants to get on the Toyota bandwagon.

> nomina rutrum rutrum
Name little shovel litte shovel...ha ha.....it makes no sense.

Ed


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: {BS} Liberals are stupid.
Next: Scott = Who do you like