{BS} Nancy Pelosi: Unemployment insurance creates jobs.
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: * ŞEBNEM FERAH-BEN ŞARKIMI SÖYLERKEN
Next: This is a f**king sperm whale in the Gulf of Mexico!!!!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Jul 2010 15:00 On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:58:41 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 20:30:42 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:19:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>> Obvious lie. You are not overqualified for any job and most likely >>>>> underqualified and underintelligent for rag picking. >>>> >>>>I've worked for 4 Fortune 100 companies, two of them in the Fortune 10. >>> >>> Wow, that means you keep losing your job. You are younger than me and I >>> have changed jobs exactly 2 times in the last 36 years.But then I am >>> exceptional at what I do. >> >>Yeah. I bet you are. > > I am sure you imagine that being able to keep a job has nothing to do with > exceptional talent but rather office politics. "exceptional talent". Like I said, you've probably proved the Peter Principle and are now just a drain on the company. > Which explains why you have > changed jobs so many times and think working for the impersonal fortune > 500 companies is a good thing. Mediocity thy name is Hachiroku. Yup. I like having jobs with Fortune 500 (and Fortune 10) companies. They have deep pockets and a lot of the best equipment available. Too bad you don't have what it takes to be hired by one. > > >>But, thanks to the Clintons, the places I worked for outsourced the jobs. >>And, rather than sit and fester in one place and probably realize "The >>Peter Principle", I reach for the Brass Ring. > > So, your latest job losses, those are all Clinton's fault too. I'll bet > you really thought working for those big impersonal monoliths was your way > to that brass ring. Yup! And you kinda sound a bit bitter because you didn't have what it takes to work for a real company. > You and the 10,000 other droids wearing the exact same > clothes, working the exact same hours, doing the exact same thing each and > every day of your life. Nope. Not at all. Being an engineering technician, and being one of the best, meant I got to work on new, exciting projects you can only dream of, and travelling to customer's sites to help them adapt the technology, or to pinpoint issues and report back to my company. > Every getaway weekend spent with the same people > you see every day at the cubicle hell you called an office because you had > to be there or someone might talk about you. A little bit of projection there? I never had to do such. Sounds like you're speaking from personal experience there, Ratzoo. I was always liked wherever I worked. > > Yeah, them fortune 500 companies are the best way to the top for the bland > vanilla worker bees of the world reaching for their brass ring. <YAWN> Poor, poor Ratzoo! > > I am sure your brass ring is still there just, outside your limited grasp. Nope. Still have it in my fingers, working for another Fortune 500 company. > > >>I'm betting people where you work refer to you as "that nasty old fossil >>soaking up a fat salary and building up a pension while we do all the >>work". > > Ah, poor Hachoo, you got cut out of a job by someone younger didn't you. Nope. Wrong again. > Someone willing to work harder and for less pay than you. Pay has nothing to do with it, and if the work is good, I work as hard as anyone. I have taken cuts in pay to get more challenging jobs that led to higher pay an even more fascinating work. Being stuck in the rut you're in, you wouldn't know anything about that, would you? > > It is amazing what their rants tell you about them. LOL! It sure is! Poor Old Ratzoo, so 'comfortable' in his work he's afraid if he leaves someone else will see him for the fraud he is! Too bad no one likes you where you work. > > >>As snuh says: >> >>Word.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Jul 2010 16:24 On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 12:53:54 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>As usual, you have pot your keen mind to the task and come, yet again, to >>the wrong conclusion. This has NOTHING to do with how I feel about >>unemployment benefits, who should be receiving them, or how long they >>should receive them. This has to do with Nancy Pelosi saying that >>Unemployment Benefits create jobs. They don't. Period. > > No, they save jobs which at the local level is virtually the same thing. Bullshit. It is nothing of the sort. How can a "saved" job be a "created" job? It can't idiot. It can only be one more job not lost. Period. If this is an example of how Democrats "think", we can see why they keep electing Pelosi. Once you're used to being fed bullshit, you'll believe anything
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Jul 2010 16:25 On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:55:36 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:49:44 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:38:35 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >> >>>>>> I recall being told many times that I couldn't be hired because I >>>>>> was overqualified for the job. They worried that, when things got >>>>>> better, I'd leave. I would of course, but it meant no job. Glad >>>>>> for unemployment insurance. Of course, hach and others don't get >>>>>> the concept of unemployment INSURANCE. >>>>> >>>>>It's an insurance policy? What insurance co underwrites it? >>>> >>>>https://ui.labor.state.ny.us/UBC/home.do >>>> >>>>Every state has a similar site. >>> >>> As many times as he has been on unemployment and he does not even >>> know... >> >>Who's underwriting the Unemployment Insurance? > > How can you not know this? What have you done with the real Hachiroku? > You're dumb as a stump compared to him and that's pretty bad. I want meathead to explain it.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Jul 2010 17:02 On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:45:40 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:24:10 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 12:53:54 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>As usual, you have pot your keen mind to the task and come, yet again, >>>>to the wrong conclusion. This has NOTHING to do with how I feel about >>>>unemployment benefits, who should be receiving them, or how long they >>>>should receive them. This has to do with Nancy Pelosi saying that >>>>Unemployment Benefits create jobs. They don't. Period. >>> >>> No, they save jobs which at the local level is virtually the same >>> thing. >> >>Bullshit. It is nothing of the sort. How can a "saved" job be a "created" >>job? >>It can't idiot. It can only be one more job not lost. > > > Which means a job created somewhere else is not replacing a lost job. > Making that a new job. We all know you know better. Perhaps your attempt > to argue over syntax is making you feel all warm and fuzzy, but it's also > making you look EXTREMELY stupid. I can never look as stupid as Aratzio. If it is a new job, it is a new job. If one job is created while another is lost, the net gain is still zero. > > Or is that what you intended all along? May never know...
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Jul 2010 17:03
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:53:21 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:25:13 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:55:36 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:49:44 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:38:35 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> I recall being told many times that I couldn't be hired because I >>>>>>>> was overqualified for the job. They worried that, when things got >>>>>>>> better, I'd leave. I would of course, but it meant no job. Glad >>>>>>>> for unemployment insurance. Of course, hach and others don't get >>>>>>>> the concept of unemployment INSURANCE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It's an insurance policy? What insurance co underwrites it? >>>>>> >>>>>>https://ui.labor.state.ny.us/UBC/home.do >>>>>> >>>>>>Every state has a similar site. >>>>> >>>>> As many times as he has been on unemployment and he does not even >>>>> know... >>>> >>>>Who's underwriting the Unemployment Insurance? >>> >>> How can you not know this? What have you done with the real Hachiroku? >>> You're dumb as a stump compared to him and that's pretty bad. >> >>I want meathead to explain it. > > Bullshit. no, really. I want to see what he can make up now to make himself look like he knows what he's talking about. |